Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WOW.js VS Three.js

Compare WOW.js VS Three.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

WOW.js logo WOW.js

Animate elements on-scroll to catch attention. Such Magic.

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.
  • WOW.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-11
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05

WOW.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    WOW.js is simple to implement. By linking the library and adding a few data attributes, users can quickly set up animations on scroll without extensive coding.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The library is designed to work across various browsers, ensuring a consistent animation experience for most users.
  • Lightweight
    WOW.js is a small library that adds minimal weight to web pages, making it an ideal choice for developers looking to enhance user experience without slowing down page load times.
  • Extensive Animation Options
    With WOW.js, there are numerous animation effects available, allowing developers to apply dynamic and varied animations easily.

Possible disadvantages of WOW.js

  • Limited Customization
    While WOW.js offers a variety of animations, deeply customizing these effects may require additional code or integration with other libraries.
  • Dependency on Animate.css
    WOW.js relies on Animate.css for animations, which means developers must include both libraries for full functionality.
  • Lacks Updates and Support
    The library is not frequently updated, and there may be limited community support compared to more widely used libraries.
  • Performance Issues on Heavy Pages
    On pages with numerous animations or complex content, WOW.js might impact performance, leading to jittery or delayed animations.

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

WOW.js videos

Hướng dẫn sử dụng Animation.css và WOW.js cho website

Three.js videos

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WOW.js and Three.js)
Animation
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
3D
100 100%
0% 0
Flowcharts
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using WOW.js and Three.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare WOW.js and Three.js

WOW.js Reviews

We have no reviews of WOW.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 247 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WOW.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WOW.js yet. Tracking of WOW.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Three.js mentions (247)

  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Optimizing Three.js: 4 Key Techniques
    But code can also create something visually stunning, something everyone can appreciate. This is where tools like Three.js shine. However, Three.js can be heavy, especially when used in a dynamic web page accessed by devices with varying computational power. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WOW.js and Three.js, you can also consider the following products

Lax.js - Create beautiful & smooth animations when you scroll

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

ScrollMagic - The jQuery plugin for magical scroll interactions.

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

ScrollReveal - ScrollReveal is a tool to add scroll animations for web and mobile browsers.

Pixi.js - Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices