The Factual helps people find unbiased news on trending news topics. It applies a machine learning engine to transparently rate 10,000+ articles/day and curates the most credible stories across the political spectrum. The Factual's email newsletter and website are growing fast with strong engagement and retention. The two co-founders are from Stanford and IIT-Madras, and have raised pre-seed funding from Defy Ventures.
Based on our record, Nebula Genomics should be more popular than The Factual. It has been mentiond 43 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
From the site, thefactual.com, MSNBC's credibility, or factual rating, ranks them in the 17th percentile. That means that MSNBC is less factual than 83% of the other news sources presented in the dataset. CNN is in the 15th percentile. Fox News sits right in the middle of these two in the 16th percentile. Source: about 1 year ago
According to thefactual.com, CNN received a Factual Grade of 53.3%, placing it in the 15th percentile. Fox News received a Factual Grade of 53.6%, placing it in the 16th percentile. Both are shitty, but according to this analysis, Fox News is marginally higher. MSNBC received a Factual Grade of 54.9%, placing it in the 17th percentile. You are a Dunning-Kruger ignoramus. Source: over 1 year ago
We also have a newsletter focused on credible news at thefactual.com, and we'd be happy to swab feedback! Source: almost 3 years ago
> Moreover investment of time on user side for newsletter delivering news increases with each newsletter vs One newsletter delivering what I want. You might be interested in this article[1] and the discussion of subscribed vs. Filtered sources. It'd be nice to have a convenient way to assign different priorities to newsletters/content sources. So for a few, you'd get every issue, and for the rest, they'd be... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Hi there, yes, we're planning a follow-up discussion for this week! Follow us via email at thefactual.com, or social media @thefactualnews and we'll keep you updated on the upcoming discussion. Our previous one did well, and we tackled multiple perspectives with data. We hope you can join the next one! Source: about 3 years ago
I just finished reading the book Dirty Genes - Dr. Ben Lynch. The following genes are introduced as a dirty gene. Do you know what are the definitions of each dirty gene with the gene, rsID, alleles, and the used scientific paper if possible? As I have my whole genome sequencing data from Nebula Genomics, I plan to try Genetic Genie's Methylation Panel test by using my genome data. Source: 11 months ago
Nebula offers 30x sequencing for 250$ and 100x for $900, not a bad deal. Source: 12 months ago
I'm planning on doing a comprehensive genetic assessment so see if there is any clue in my DNA. Https://nebula.org/whole-genome-sequencing-dna-test/. Source: almost 1 year ago
I think Nebula makes the promise of anonymizing your data and permanently deleting it once the retention period has expired. https://nebula.org/whole-genome-sequencing-dna-test/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Yeah, full DNA sequencing costs more, but is also surprisingly cheap. These guys are around $500, for example: https://nebula.org/whole-genome-sequencing-dna-test/. Source: about 1 year ago
Fact Check by Google - Google fights fake news in search with 'fact check'
BlenderBIM Add-on - An add-on for beautiful, detailed, and data-rich OpenBIM with Blender
Partial Press - Breaking news according to political bias 🗞
Chronomics - See how your environment and lifestyle affects your DNA 🧬
Ground News Pro - Platform to compare news sources covering the same issue
Dante - Dante’s easy-to-use training management software allows you to grow your training business faster by cutting out the admin work and manual course tasks.