Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Supabase UI VS Jekyll

Compare Supabase UI VS Jekyll and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Supabase UI logo Supabase UI

React component library for enterprise dashboards

Jekyll logo Jekyll

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
  • Supabase UI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-08
  • Jekyll Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-17

Supabase UI features and specs

  • Ease of Integration
    Supabase UI components are designed to integrate seamlessly with Supabase projects, making it easier for developers to add user interface elements without extensive setup or configuration.
  • Customizability
    Supabase UI offers customizable components that can be tailored to fit the unique design requirements of various projects, allowing for greater flexibility in UI design.
  • Consistency
    Using Supabase UI ensures a consistent look and feel across applications that rely on Supabase, facilitating a unified user experience.
  • Open Source
    Supabase UI is open source, meaning developers can view, modify, and contribute to the source code, fostering community involvement and transparency.

Possible disadvantages of Supabase UI

  • Limited Component Library
    Compared to more established UI libraries, Supabase UI may have a smaller set of available components, which may not cover all use cases.
  • Early Development Stage
    As a newer solution, Supabase UI might experience rapid changes and updates, possibly leading to instability or breaking changes in some releases.
  • Dependency on Supabase
    While tailored for Supabase, this tight integration may make it less ideal for projects that do not use Supabase as their backend solution.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    Developers who are not familiar with Supabase or its ecosystem might face a learning curve when trying to understand and use the UI components effectively.

Jekyll features and specs

  • Speed and Performance
    Jekyll generates static websites, which means they load faster compared to dynamic websites. No database queries are required, reducing server overhead and improving performance.
  • Security
    Static sites have a smaller attack surface compared to dynamic sites because they don't rely on databases or server-side code. This means fewer vectors for potential compromises.
  • Simplicity
    Jekyll setups are relatively straightforward, especially if you are comfortable writing in Markdown and HTML. This can make it easier to manage and maintain your website.
  • Integration with GitHub Pages
    Jekyll is designed to work seamlessly with GitHub Pages, allowing you to host your website for free with automatic deployment directly from your GitHub repository.
  • Customizability
    Jekyll allows for extensive customization through its support for plugins, themes, and templates. This can be helpful to create a unique look and functionality for your website.

Possible disadvantages of Jekyll

  • Learning Curve
    While Jekyll is simpler than some other static site generators, it does require some familiarity with the command line, version control (Git), and YAML configuration.
  • Build Time
    For large websites, the build times can become lengthy, which can slow down the development process, especially if you are making frequent updates.
  • Lack of Real-time Content Updates
    Since Jekyll generates static sites, real-time content updates (e.g., comments, dynamic forms) aren't natively supported and require third-party services or additional tooling.
  • Dependence on Ruby
    Jekyll is built with Ruby, so you will need to have Ruby installed and occasionally deal with Ruby-specific issues. This might be a drawback for developers who are not familiar with the Ruby ecosystem.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While Jekyll is very flexible, it doesn’t have built-in support for many features out of the box, which might require you to manually implement or rely on plugins.

Analysis of Jekyll

Overall verdict

  • Jekyll is a good choice for individuals and organizations looking for a straightforward, reliable, and efficient way to build static websites. Its strengths include simplicity, flexibility, and strong community support, which contribute to a smooth development experience.

Why this product is good

  • Jekyll is a popular static site generator that is widely appreciated for its simplicity, speed, and ease of use. It is particularly suited for creating blogs and simple websites, leveraging Markdown and Liquid templates to generate static HTML content. Its integration with GitHub Pages also makes it a convenient choice for developers and non-developers alike who want to host their sites directly from their GitHub repositories without additional setup or cost.

Recommended for

  • Bloggers and content creators looking for a simple way to publish content online.
  • Developers who prefer writing in Markdown and managing content with a version control system.
  • Users who want to host their sites for free using GitHub Pages.
  • Anyone in need of a static site generator that is easy to set up, customize, and maintain with minimal resources.

Supabase UI videos

No Supabase UI videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Jekyll videos

Getting Started With Jekyll, The Static Site Generator

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Supabase UI and Jekyll)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
CMS
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Blogging
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Supabase UI and Jekyll. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Supabase UI and Jekyll

Supabase UI Reviews

We have no reviews of Supabase UI yet.
Be the first one to post

Jekyll Reviews

Best Gitbook Alternatives You Need to Try in 2023
Jekyll is a static site generator often used to create blogs and websites, similar to Gitbook in its ability to generate documentation from markdown files. Jekyll is built in Ruby and is known for its flexibility and ease of use. It also has a large community and a wide variety of plugins and themes available. Jekyll's main advantage is that it is highly customizable,...
Source: www.archbee.com
11 Popular Free And Open Source WordPress CMS alternatives in 2021
Unlike some listed alternatives, Jekyll is also a static site generator so it lays in the same category. It uses Ruby and we would say it's simpler, free, and open-source CMS software.
Source: medevel.com
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Jekyll isn’t strict with its content location. It expects pages in the root of your site, and will build whatever’s there. Here’s how you might organize these pages in your Jekyll site root:
9 Reasons I Think Craft is the Best CMS on the Market Today
Craft CMS is simple, minimalistic, agile and has every capability a modern CMS framework needs. Over the past ten years we have worked with every CMS you could think of (Wordpress, Drupal, Rails+ActiveAdmin, Ghost, Weebly, DjangoCMS, Jekyll, Joomla, Tumblr, Squarespace, Expression Engine, Statamic, Blogger)… here are the reasons why we’ve landed firmly with Craft as our №1...
Source: hackernoon.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jekyll seems to be a lot more popular than Supabase UI. While we know about 195 links to Jekyll, we've tracked only 4 mentions of Supabase UI. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Supabase UI mentions (4)

  • Frontend letter to frontend lovers
    Supabase have introduced new Supabase UI, just like we did iHateReading UI 😃. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Supabase adoption guide: Overview, examples, and alternatives
    Supabase UI is an open source library of UI components that was inspired by Tailwind and Ant Design and seeks to help developers quickly build applications with Supabase. This library provides a set of pre-built components that are styled and ready to use, ensuring consistency and reducing the amount of time needed to develop the UI. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • User Authentication in Next.js with Supabase
    Supabase also provides an open source component library called Supabase UI, which is a collection of common UI components and utilities that are used across the range of Supabase products. Its styling is heavily inspired by Tailwind CSS, so you know it will look good out of the box. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • The Open Source alternative to Twilio (Fonoster) is the second most popular repo in GitHub today for the Javascript category
    Nothing to do with Superbase. But because the logo is green I decided to use their site as the base for mine. No to mention that we are early adopters of https://ui.supabase.io/ (hoping they add theming soon). Source: over 3 years ago

Jekyll mentions (195)

  • Building PicoSSG: 'Just Enough Code'
    The static site generator (SSG) landscape is crowded with feature-rich but increasingly complex solutions. As I looked at and used tools like lume, 11ty, lektor, or jekyll, I found myself drowning in configuration options, plugins, and middleware. What started as a simple desire to convert Markdown content into HTML had evolved into learning complex frameworks with steep learning curves. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
  • How to create a blog with Quartz, GitHub, and Cloudflare
    If you don't want to use Jekyll as your static site generator for GitHub Pages and you want to have a custom domain for your GitHub Pages. This post is for you! - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Blogging with Obsidian and Jekyll
    Jekyll is a static site generator that transforms Markdown files into a fully functional website. Everything is generated into plain HTML, which makes it simple to deploy on platforms like GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Create a Blogging Platform With No Backend (Zero Hosting Fee)
    Obviously, there are a dozen choices for generating static websites (efficiently and quickly), from the classic Jekyll to the new Next.js. And you are good to go with any of them as long as your confident with it. I choose 11ty because:. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • It's easy to dev blog
    In your repository settings you need to turn on GitHub Pages to make it pull Jekyll content (that's the magic✨ default GitHub Pages build tool) from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Supabase UI and Jekyll, you can also consider the following products

Flawwwless ui - Simplified open source React.js components library 🚀

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

NextUI - NextUI is the next-gen UI React library that allows you to make beautiful websites regardless of your design experience, comes with awesome features like Auto Dark Mode recognition, Themes support, easy customization, Best-in-class DX and much more.

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Sencha - Sencha equips developers with frameworks, tools and services to help them build amazing web application experiences using HTML5 and JavaScript.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.