Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

styled-components VS Skeleton CSS

Compare styled-components VS Skeleton CSS and see what are their differences

PulpMiner
Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

styled-components logo styled-components

styled-components is a visual primitive for the component age that also helps the user to use the ES6 and CSS to style apps.

Skeleton CSS logo Skeleton CSS

A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development
  • styled-components Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27
  • Skeleton CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

styled-components features and specs

  • Component-Scoped Styling
    Styles are encapsulated within components, ensuring that styles do not leak or conflict with other parts of the application.
  • Dynamic Styling
    Enables dynamic styling with the help of JavaScript variables and props, allowing for highly customizable components.
  • CSS Syntax
    Allows developers to write actual CSS code within JavaScript, making it easier for those familiar with CSS to adapt.
  • Automatic Vendor Prefixing
    Automatically adds vendor prefixes to CSS properties, ensuring cross-browser compatibility without additional configuration.
  • Theming Support
    Provides a built-in theming solution, making it easier to implement and switch between different themes in the application.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Supports server-side rendering, improving initial page load times and SEO.

Possible disadvantages of styled-components

  • Bundle Size
    Styled-components can add to the overall bundle size, potentially affecting performance, especially in large projects.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires developers to learn the styled-components library and its API, which can be a hurdle for new team members or those unfamiliar with CSS-in-JS.
  • Performance Overhead
    The runtime cost of parsing and injecting styles can impact performance, particularly in larger applications or with frequent style changes.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    While improving, the ecosystem around styled-components (e.g., linting, debugging) is not as mature as traditional CSS or CSS preprocessor tools.
  • CSS-in-JS Limitations
    Some CSS features, like advanced selectors or cascading, may be more cumbersome or less intuitive to implement compared to traditional CSS approaches.

Skeleton CSS features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Skeleton CSS is extremely lightweight, with a file size of just about 400 lines of code, making it quick to load and easy to manage compared to bulkier frameworks.
  • Simplicity
    Its simplicity makes it easy to learn and implement, which is ideal for beginners or for small projects that don't require complex styling.
  • Responsive Grid
    Skeleton CSS includes a responsive grid system, which helps in creating responsive layouts that easily adjust to various screen sizes.
  • Clean Design
    Skeleton offers a clean and minimal design by default, providing a good starting point for further customization without unnecessary bloat.

Possible disadvantages of Skeleton CSS

  • Limited Components
    Skeleton CSS lacks the range of components available in larger frameworks like Bootstrap or Foundation, making it less flexible for larger or more complex projects.
  • Customization
    While its simplicity is an advantage, it also means less out-of-the-box customization options compared to more comprehensive frameworks.
  • Community and Support
    Skeleton CSS has a smaller community and fewer resources or plugins available, meaning less peer and developer support is accessible compared to more popular frameworks.
  • Scalability
    It is less suited for large-scale applications where a more feature-rich and modular framework might be necessary to manage complex requirements.

Analysis of styled-components

Overall verdict

  • Styled-components is considered a good choice for many React projects, especially for large applications where modularity and maintainability of styles are important. It has a strong community, extensive documentation, and is widely adopted in the industry.

Why this product is good

  • Styled-components is a popular library for styling React applications. It allows developers to write CSS-in-JS, which means that styles are written in JavaScript and scoped to individual components. This approach offers several benefits, such as easier style management, dynamic styling capabilities, and the ability to leverage JavaScript's full power for styles. Styled-components also supports theming, making it easier to develop consistent design systems.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to implement a consistent design system with theming capabilities
  • Large-scale React applications where component-based styling is essential
  • Projects that require dynamic styling based on props or state
  • Teams familiar with or willing to adopt a CSS-in-JS approach

Analysis of Skeleton CSS

Overall verdict

  • Skeleton CSS is a good choice for developers seeking a minimalist framework that provides essential styling without unnecessary complexity. It's particularly beneficial for small projects or when you need to rapidly prototype designs. However, for larger projects with extensive UI component requirements, a more comprehensive framework might be more suitable.

Why this product is good

  • Skeleton CSS is a lightweight CSS framework designed for simplicity and ease of use. It provides a flexible grid system and basic styles for common HTML elements, making it ideal for starting projects quickly without the overhead of more complex frameworks. Its minimalistic approach ensures that developers have a clean slate to work from, without being overwhelmed by pre-designed components or themes. Additionally, its simplicity makes it easy to learn and modify, which is great for developers who prefer more control over their project's appearance.

Recommended for

    Skeleton CSS is recommended for developers who appreciate a minimalist approach, those working on small to medium-sized projects, designers who want a lightweight starting point without a steep learning curve, and anyone looking to quickly prototype ideas without being bogged down by extensive styling rules or pre-existing themes.

styled-components videos

No styled-components videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Skeleton CSS videos

+ Add

Skeleton Anatomy and Physiology Review Bones 01

More videos:

  • Review - skeleton anatomy easy review for practical exam bones and structures
  • Review - Unboxing and Review Head Unit Skeleton SKT 8197 Universal

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to styled-components and Skeleton CSS)

styled-components

Skeleton CSS

Developer Tools
72 72%
Developer Tools
28% 28
CSS Framework
32 32%
CSS Framework
68% 68
Design Tools
58 58%
Design Tools
42% 42
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using styled-components and Skeleton CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare styled-components and Skeleton CSS

styled-components Reviews

We have no reviews of styled-components yet.
Be the first one to post

Skeleton CSS Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For
Balance Functionality and Performance: High functionality might come with the cost of performance. For example, MUI is exceptional for material design, but it might be heavier compared to lighter frameworks like Skeleton. Strive for a balance between the functionality you need and the performance you can afford to sacrifice.
Source: thectoclub.com
15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
However, it's important to note that Skeleton lacks active maintenance, posing a significant drawback. Additionally, the security of the Skeleton website is currently questionable. Furthermore, its use of outdated markup for layout, such as floats and clear fixes, may present compatibility issues in modern web development environments.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Skeleton is a lightweight CSS framework, majorly popular for its 12-column fluid grid, which consists of rows and columns, similar to other CSS grids. The newer version of Skeleton adopts a mobile-first approach, which enables the layout to be the center of attraction, irrespective of the screen size. Being lightweight, Skeleton can speed up the front-end development process.
Source: hackr.io
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
As the name suggests, the Skeleton is a light framework. If your website is small and straightforward, Skeleton provides a necessary collection of CSS elements to speed up your development. It provides lightly styled forms, tabs, buttons, etc. You get a responsive grid, Vanilla CSS, and media queries for your project without the larger frameworks' complexities. It is a great...
Source: hackr.io
15 Best CSS Frameworks: Professional Bootstrap and Foundation Alternatives
As a two-in-one solution, Skeleton quickly made it on our list. This is both a boilerplate and a comprehensive CSS framework. We enjoyed customizing its 12-column grid during our testing, and we found out that it has virtually no learning curve.
Source: www.webdesignerdepot.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, styled-components should be more popular than Skeleton CSS. It has been mentiond 170 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

styled-components mentions (170)

  • The CSS Odyssey: Why I Turned back to CSS After Trying Everything Else
    Diving into CSS-in-JS wasn't really a technical choice. My wife, as a UX designer, had good words about Material Design, so I headed to MUI without thinking too much. At that time, Emotion was the first-class citizen there. Meanwhile, my company's UI component library chose styled-components for styling. Both are widely used CSS-in-JS libraries. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
  • 11 Interview Questions You Should Know as a React Native Developer in 2025 📈🚀
    Using the same CSS-in-JS approach as React, you can use libraries like Styled Components to style your components. This allows you to write CSS directly in your JavaScript files (personally not a fan of using these). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • CSS-in-JS: Pros and cons
    The 2016 release of styled-components popularized the approach, offering a clean syntax and React integration. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Woovi monorepos best practices
    This detail implies if any dependencies can be resolved correctly and if not have a version conflict. As the example we have the styled-components lib, it can have a problem with type Symbol reference where the library doesn´t find your properties of themes because, in your internal code, it uses the symbolObject which is a unique object that refers your set configs. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Top 20 Modern React Libraries To Supercharge Your Next Big Project
    Resource: Styled Components Documentation. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

Skeleton CSS mentions (17)

  • Concrete.css
    I had been using similar projects such as skeleton[0] and milligram[1] for small experiments such as repfl[2], and wanted to create something similar that I would find aesthetically pleasing and that would fit in as little space as possible. The current version of concrete.css is less than 1kb minzipped! [0] http://getskeleton.com/ [1] https://milligram.io/ [2] https://repfl.ch/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: How to build online calculator website?
    Here's my personal goto: Find some minimal CSS framework. My preference is Skeleton [0] or Bootstrap [1]. The key is just finding something minimal that works without too much fuss. Personally, I rather have a minimal framework provide 'responsiveness' so I don't have to worry about it but I also want it to get out of the way of anything I do. Use JQuery [2]. Don't rely on CSS for animations or interactivity. In... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Suggest minimal CSS framework
    I've used http://getskeleton.com/ in the past. I think it's probably just what you're looking for. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Pdf generated from form
    I use an older css library called skeleton. It’s a utility framework that came out before css grid. It has a really nice and easy to use grid system built without css-grid. I had to get rid of the media queries to get it work but it’s been great otherwise! Source: over 2 years ago
  • what do you do when coding for responsive?
    I use a minified and customised simple boilerplate / grid system based in skeleton (http://getskeleton.com/). It has no mediaqueries predefined, but the rules for each screen resolution are stated. I start making the website for computer screen formats (large resolutions) and end adapting up the design to phone screens. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing styled-components and Skeleton CSS, you can also consider the following products

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Sass - Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Ant Design - An enterprise-class UI design language and React implementation with a set of high-quality React components, one of best React UI library for enterprises

Foundation - The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world

Loading...