Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Sass VS Skeleton CSS

Compare Sass VS Skeleton CSS and see what are their differences

Sass logo Sass

Syntatically Awesome Style Sheets

Skeleton CSS logo Skeleton CSS

A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development
  • Sass Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-19
  • Skeleton CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

Sass features and specs

  • Nesting
    Sass allows for nested syntax, making it easier to target specific elements and providing a clear, hierarchical structure to CSS code.
  • Variables
    Sass supports variables that can store values such as colors, fonts, or any CSS value, making it simple to maintain and update styles.
  • Mixins
    Mixins in Sass enable reusable chunks of code, which can dramatically reduce redundancy and simplify complex CSS.
  • Partials and Import
    With Sass, CSS can be split into smaller, more manageable partial files which are then imported into a central stylesheet, enhancing modularity and organization.
  • Control Directives
    Sass includes control directives (such as @if, @for, @each) that allow for conditional logic and loops, providing more dynamic CSS generation.
  • Built-in Functions
    Sass offers a variety of built-in functions for manipulating colors, strings, and other values, empowering developers to create more sophisticated styles.
  • Compass and Other Frameworks
    Sass can be extended with frameworks such as Compass, which provides additional mixins and functionality, speeding up development.
  • Community and Documentation
    Sass has a strong community and comprehensive documentation, which makes it easier to find solutions to problems and learn best practices.

Possible disadvantages of Sass

  • Learning Curve
    Sass introduces various features and syntax that may require additional time and resources to learn and adopt, especially for developers new to pre-processors.
  • Dependency on Compilation
    Sass needs to be compiled into standard CSS, which requires build tools and adds an extra step in the development workflow.
  • Tooling Requirements
    Using Sass effectively often involves additional tools like Node.js, npm, and task runners (e.g., Gulp, Grunt), which can complicate setup and maintenance.
  • Performance
    In large projects, the compilation time for Sass can become noticeable, potentially slowing down the development process, especially when dealing with extensive stylesheets.
  • Compatibility
    Older projects or those not built with modern development tools might face compatibility issues when integrating Sass, requiring significant refactoring.
  • Overhead
    For smaller projects, the overhead of setting up and maintaining Sass and its related tools may not be justified compared to the benefits gained.

Skeleton CSS features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Skeleton CSS is extremely lightweight, with a file size of just about 400 lines of code, making it quick to load and easy to manage compared to bulkier frameworks.
  • Simplicity
    Its simplicity makes it easy to learn and implement, which is ideal for beginners or for small projects that don't require complex styling.
  • Responsive Grid
    Skeleton CSS includes a responsive grid system, which helps in creating responsive layouts that easily adjust to various screen sizes.
  • Clean Design
    Skeleton offers a clean and minimal design by default, providing a good starting point for further customization without unnecessary bloat.

Possible disadvantages of Skeleton CSS

  • Limited Components
    Skeleton CSS lacks the range of components available in larger frameworks like Bootstrap or Foundation, making it less flexible for larger or more complex projects.
  • Customization
    While its simplicity is an advantage, it also means less out-of-the-box customization options compared to more comprehensive frameworks.
  • Community and Support
    Skeleton CSS has a smaller community and fewer resources or plugins available, meaning less peer and developer support is accessible compared to more popular frameworks.
  • Scalability
    It is less suited for large-scale applications where a more feature-rich and modular framework might be necessary to manage complex requirements.

Sass videos

The Armalite AR10 Super SASS

More videos:

  • Review - Armalite Super SASS
  • Review - M110 SASS to 800yds: Practical Accuracy (Leupold Mk4, US Sniper Rifle)
  • Review - Anatomy of the Semi Automatic Sniper System (SASS): Featuring the Lone Star Armory TX10 DM Heavy
  • Review - ArmaLite XM110 Rifle to AR10 Super SASS

Skeleton CSS videos

Skeleton Anatomy and Physiology Review Bones 01

More videos:

  • Review - skeleton anatomy easy review for practical exam bones and structures
  • Review - Unboxing and Review Head Unit Skeleton SKT 8197 Universal

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Sass and Skeleton CSS)
Developer Tools
78 78%
22% 22
CSS Framework
55 55%
45% 45
Design Tools
63 63%
37% 37
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Sass and Skeleton CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Sass and Skeleton CSS

Sass Reviews

We have no reviews of Sass yet.
Be the first one to post

Skeleton CSS Reviews

22 Best Bootstrap Alternatives & What Each Is Best For
Balance Functionality and Performance: High functionality might come with the cost of performance. For example, MUI is exceptional for material design, but it might be heavier compared to lighter frameworks like Skeleton. Strive for a balance between the functionality you need and the performance you can afford to sacrifice.
Source: thectoclub.com
15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
However, it's important to note that Skeleton lacks active maintenance, posing a significant drawback. Additionally, the security of the Skeleton website is currently questionable. Furthermore, its use of outdated markup for layout, such as floats and clear fixes, may present compatibility issues in modern web development environments.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Skeleton is a lightweight CSS framework, majorly popular for its 12-column fluid grid, which consists of rows and columns, similar to other CSS grids. The newer version of Skeleton adopts a mobile-first approach, which enables the layout to be the center of attraction, irrespective of the screen size. Being lightweight, Skeleton can speed up the front-end development process.
Source: hackr.io
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
As the name suggests, the Skeleton is a light framework. If your website is small and straightforward, Skeleton provides a necessary collection of CSS elements to speed up your development. It provides lightly styled forms, tabs, buttons, etc. You get a responsive grid, Vanilla CSS, and media queries for your project without the larger frameworks' complexities. It is a great...
Source: hackr.io
15 Best CSS Frameworks: Professional Bootstrap and Foundation Alternatives
As a two-in-one solution, Skeleton quickly made it on our list. This is both a boilerplate and a comprehensive CSS framework. We enjoyed customizing its 12-column grid during our testing, and we found out that it has virtually no learning curve.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sass should be more popular than Skeleton CSS. It has been mentiond 144 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Sass mentions (144)

View more

Skeleton CSS mentions (17)

  • Concrete.css
    I had been using similar projects such as skeleton[0] and milligram[1] for small experiments such as repfl[2], and wanted to create something similar that I would find aesthetically pleasing and that would fit in as little space as possible. The current version of concrete.css is less than 1kb minzipped! [0] http://getskeleton.com/ [1] https://milligram.io/ [2] https://repfl.ch/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: How to build online calculator website?
    Here's my personal goto: Find some minimal CSS framework. My preference is Skeleton [0] or Bootstrap [1]. The key is just finding something minimal that works without too much fuss. Personally, I rather have a minimal framework provide 'responsiveness' so I don't have to worry about it but I also want it to get out of the way of anything I do. Use JQuery [2]. Don't rely on CSS for animations or interactivity. In... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Suggest minimal CSS framework
    I've used http://getskeleton.com/ in the past. I think it's probably just what you're looking for. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Pdf generated from form
    I use an older css library called skeleton. It’s a utility framework that came out before css grid. It has a really nice and easy to use grid system built without css-grid. I had to get rid of the media queries to get it work but it’s been great otherwise! Source: over 2 years ago
  • what do you do when coding for responsive?
    I use a minified and customised simple boilerplate / grid system based in skeleton (http://getskeleton.com/). It has no mediaqueries predefined, but the rules for each screen resolution are stated. I start making the website for computer screen formats (large resolutions) and end adapting up the design to phone screens. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Sass and Skeleton CSS, you can also consider the following products

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Materialize CSS - A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Stylus - EXPRESSIVE, DYNAMIC, ROBUST CSS

Foundation - The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world