Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Standard JS VS RuboCop

Compare Standard JS VS RuboCop and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Standard JS logo Standard JS

DevOps, Build, Test, Deploy, and Code Review

RuboCop logo RuboCop

A Ruby static code analyzer, based on the community Ruby style guide.
  • Standard JS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29
  • RuboCop Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30

Standard JS features and specs

  • Zero Configuration
    Standard JS comes with a set of rules and configurations out of the box. This eliminates the need to set up a linting configuration file, saving developers time and reducing the cognitive load associated with decision-making.
  • Uniformity
    By enforcing a consistent style across projects, Standard JS helps to create a uniform codebase. This makes it easier for teams to read and understand each other's code, reducing onboarding time for new developers.
  • Community and Support
    As a popular style guide and linter, Standard JS has a robust community and extensive documentation. This support makes it easier for developers to find solutions to issues and to integrate Standard JS into their projects.
  • Less Distraction
    With pre-set rules, developers spend less time debating over coding styles and more time focusing on actual code logic and building functionality.

Possible disadvantages of Standard JS

  • Limited Customization
    Since Standard JS comes with a predefined set of rules, it offers limited flexibility for customization. Developers who prefer tailor-made configurations might find it restrictive.
  • Opinionated Rules
    Standard JS follows an opinionated approach to styling, which might not align with certain team or individual preferences. Some developers might find specific enforced styles disagreeable.
  • Compatibility Issues
    In some cases, Standard JS rules might conflict with pre-existing project configurations or other linters in the project, possibly causing friction during integration.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers new to Standard JS, there may be a learning curve as they acclimate to its specific rules and enforcement practices, particularly if they're used to other style guides.

RuboCop features and specs

  • Code Consistency
    RuboCop enforces a uniform style across a Ruby codebase, making it more consistent and readable.
  • Customizable
    RuboCop allows customization of the rules and settings, which can be adjusted according to the specific needs of a project or team.
  • Automatic Code Correction
    RuboCop can automatically correct some of the style violations, thereby saving developers time on manual style fixes.
  • Integration with CI/CD
    RuboCop can be easily integrated into Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, helping maintain code quality automatically with each build.
  • Broad Adoption and Community Support
    With broad usage and an active community, RuboCop receives regular updates and contributions, enhancing its features and capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of RuboCop

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users may find the tool initially overwhelming due to the abundance of available rules and configurations.
  • Overhead for Large Projects
    For extensive codebases, RuboCop might add overhead to the development process due to performance slowdowns during code analysis.
  • Conflicting Rules
    Sometimes, the default rules might conflict with existing project styles or team preferences, requiring manual adjustments.
  • False Positives
    RuboCop can sometimes generate false positives, flagging code that is actually correct according to specific project practices.
  • Dependency on Updates
    As a tool with regular updates, maintaining compatibility with the latest RuboCop version can occasionally be challenging.

Standard JS videos

No Standard JS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

RuboCop videos

+ Add

RubyConfBY 2018: Bozhidar Batsov "All about RuboCop"

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to setup Rubocop and best practices of its usage | Lifehacks on Ruby
  • Review - [EN] All About RuboCop / Bozhidar Batsov @bbatsov

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Standard JS and RuboCop)

Standard JS

RuboCop

Code Coverage
78 78%
Code Coverage
22% 22
Code Review
0 0%
Code Review
100% 100
Code Analysis
80 80%
Code Analysis
20% 20
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Standard JS and RuboCop. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Standard JS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Standard JS mentions (27)

  • Mastering Code Quality: Setting Up ESLint with Standard JS in TypeScript Projects
    Sorry, I've gone too far. I'm not here to persuade you to use Standard JS. My intention is to provide information and guidance on configuring JavaScript Standard Style for your team, should you agree with me or have other reasons to choose it. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Why is Prettier rock solid?
    I picked up standard[1] a while back for this reason, I don't want to have to think about it. It works fine, I have no complaints (took me a while to get used to not using semi-colons but now I prefer it) Same reason I use `cargo fmt` as well. [1] https://standardjs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • My prepared repositories for hacktoberfest 23 - any contributions are welcomed 🚀
    A Thin JavaScript Document Storage with Middleware Stack. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Dumb question
    For example, if you use https://standardjs.com/ - it will error on your second code snippet and if you ask it for an autofix - it will transfer the minus sign to the first line. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Unleash the Power of Java: A JavaScript Developer's Guide to Best Practices in Java Development
    In comparison, JavaScript doesn't have a strict coding standard, although it does have widely accepted code style guides like the Airbnb JavaScript Style Guide and the JavaScript Standard Style. These guides provide recommendations for code formatting and naming conventions, but they are not as strictly enforced as the Java coding standard. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

RuboCop mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RuboCop yet. Tracking of RuboCop recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Standard JS and RuboCop, you can also consider the following products

Prettier - An opinionated code formatter

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool

EditorConfig - EditorConfig is a file format and collection of text editor plugins for maintaining consistent coding styles between different editors and IDEs.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Loading...