Software Alternatives & Reviews

RuboCop

A Ruby static code analyzer, based on the community Ruby style guide.

· Edit

RuboCop Alternatives

The best RuboCop alternatives based on verified products, community votes, reviews and other factors.
Latest update:

  1. 21

    SonarQube is a self-managed static analysis tool used for continuous codebase inspection.

    freemium $150.0 / Annually

  2. 18

    The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool

  3. 18

    An opinionated code formatter

  4. 18

    Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

  5. 14

    An extensible static analysis linter for the TypeScript language

  6. 13

    Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

  7. EditorConfig is a file format and collection of text editor plugins for maintaining consistent coding styles between different editors and IDEs.

  8. Codegrip is an automated code review tool that not only provides the user with detailed code review reports but also gives suggested solutions to solve the issues. It is the only automated code review platform that does not store the user's code

  9. stylelint is a modern CSS linter

  10. Brakeman is a static analysis security vulnerability scanner for Ruby on Rails applications.

  11. Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

  12. All Node Sass linter!

  13. Code smell detector for Ruby

Suggest an alternative
If you think we've missed something, suggest an alternative to RuboCop.

Generic RuboCop discussion

Log in or Post with

RuboCop Reviews

There are no reviews of RuboCop yet.
Be the first one to post

Was this RuboCop alternatives list helpful? Your feedback is important!

Yes No

9 out of 12 people consider this list as helpful.
This is equivalent to 3.8 / 5 rating.

Author: | Publisher: SaaSHub
Categories: Code Coverage, Code Analysis, Code Quality