Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

StackEdit VS Commit Together by Github

Compare StackEdit VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

StackEdit logo StackEdit

Full-featured, open-source Markdown editor based on PageDown, the Markdown library used by Stack Overflow and the other Stack Exchange sites.

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits
  • StackEdit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

StackEdit videos

StackEdit - Write Markdown on Google Drive

More videos:

  • Review - StackEdit éditeur puissant de Markdown en ligne 💪

Commit Together by Github videos

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to StackEdit and Commit Together by Github)
Markdown Editor
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
63 63%
37% 37

User comments

Share your experience with using StackEdit and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, StackEdit seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Together by Github. While we know about 49 links to StackEdit, we've tracked only 1 mention of Commit Together by Github. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

StackEdit mentions (49)

  • Markdown as Fast as Possible
    Alternatively, you can use an online markdown editor like StackEdit or HackMD. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Good Notes App?
    Use https://stackedit.io/ in the browser :). Source: 6 months ago
  • Vrite Editor: Open-Source WYSIWYG Markdown Editor
    Markdown is awesome! But, when writing 1000 words+ articles, I quickly feel the need for a better experience. For years, I’ve used StackEdit — an open-source, in-browser Markdown editor — for editing all kinds of long-format Markdown text. That said, given my recent experience with WYSIWYG editors, I thought I could do something better. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • stackedit.io settings: exporting markdown code blocks to HTML, how to get them to wrap?
    This is especially annoying as when I export from stackedit.io to HTML, then it just cuts off anything which is outside the greyed in code window! Source: 11 months ago
  • Show HN: I've built open-source, collaborative, WYSIWYG Markdown editor
    StackEdit[0] pretty much perfected what I needed out of a markdown editor - I just need somewhere to write my tickets/docs that wasn't Github so that I could format it properly while writing. I still use it from time to time [0]: https://stackedit.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
View more

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing StackEdit and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products

Typora - A minimal Markdown reading & writing app.

CommitTasks - A small CLI tool that combines git commit and todo list 🛠📝

Markdown by DaringFireball - Text-to-HTML conversion tool/syntax for web writers, by John Gruber

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

MarkdownPad - MarkdownPad is a full-featured Markdown editor for Windows. Features:

Commit Print - Posters of your git history