Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

StackEdit VS Commit Together by Github

Compare StackEdit VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

StackEdit

Full-featured, open-source Markdown editor based on PageDown, the Markdown library used by Stack Overflow and the other Stack Exchange sites.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
AeroDataBox
Aviation and flight API tailored for SMBs and individual developers, offering flight status, schedules, aircraft and airport data, statistics, historical data and more. Seamless REST/web hook integration via API marketplaces at affordable rates. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, StackEdit seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Together by Github. While we know about 52 links to StackEdit, we've tracked only 1 mention of Commit Together by Github.

social mentions
52 vs 1
Markdown Editor popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 87

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

StackEdit
Commit Together by Github
Website stackedit.io github.blog
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in
Markdown Editor Text Editors Markdown Viewer Office & Productivity +1
Developer Tools Productivity Coding Crypto +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

StackEdit 5 features
Commit Together by Github 4 features
  • Markdown Support
    StackEdit offers robust support for Markdown, allowing for efficient and straightforward text formatting and editing.
  • Offline Access
    Users can work on their documents offline, making it convenient for use in areas with limited or no internet connectivity.
  • Synchronization
    StackEdit can be synchronized with various cloud storage services like Google Drive and Dropbox, enabling easy access and backup.
  • Collaboration
    The platform supports real-time collaboration, which is useful for teams working on a document simultaneously.
  • Integrated Editor
    It includes a feature-rich Markdown editor with a live preview, which helps users see the formatted version of their text as they type.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with Markdown may find it initially challenging to use all of StackEdit's features effectively.
  • Limited Export Options
    While it does support exporting to HTML, PDF, and a few other formats, the export options may be limited compared to other markdown editors.
  • Performance
    Some users might experience performance issues with large documents or when using the application for extended periods.
  • Requires Signup for Full Features
    To access all features, such as cloud synchronization and import/export options, users need to sign up for an account.
  • Dependency on Internet for Sync
    While offline editing is a plus, syncing documents still requires an internet connection, which may be inconvenient for some users.
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

StackEdit
Commit Together by Github

Overall verdict

  • StackEdit is generally considered a good tool for those who need a reliable markdown editor with advanced features, especially for users who value cloud integration and offline functionality.

Why this product is good

  • StackEdit is a versatile, in-browser markdown editor that offers a variety of features, such as real-time collaboration, seamless synchronization with cloud services like Google Drive and Dropbox, and offline editing capabilities. It supports a wide range of markdown variations and extensions, making it suitable for different types of documentation and note-taking needs.

Recommended for

    StackEdit is highly recommended for writers, bloggers, developers, and students who frequently work with markdown files and need a powerful editor that can integrate with cloud storage services while providing collaboration features.

No analysis of Commit Together by Github yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

StackEdit 2 videos + Add
Commit Together by Github 0 videos + Add

StackEdit - Write Markdown on Google Drive

More videos

  • - StackEdit éditeur puissant de Markdown en ligne 💪

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
StackEdit
Commit Together by Github
100% 100%
Markdown Editor
0% 0%
0% 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Text Editors
0% 0%
0% 0%
Productivity
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using StackEdit and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

StackEdit 52 mentions
Commit Together by Github 1 mention
  • Show HN: MarkNote – Local-First Wysiwyg Markdown Editor (Tauri/Rust)
    - Not sure if I want auto-save (see above) This is another local-first editor I would prefer using (no install required): https://stackedit.io --- I also prefer installing via brew. Otherwise macOS doesn't allow you to run the app... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • If it is worth keeping, save it in Markdown
    Https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#philosophy "Markdown-formatted document should be publishable as-is, as plain text, without looking like it’s been marked up with tags or formatting instructions." Any text editor... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    StackEdit: An open-source, free Markdown editor based on PageDown. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

Alternatives to StackEdit and Commit Together by Github

When comparing StackEdit and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...