Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SSL Alerts VS HTTP

Compare SSL Alerts VS HTTP and see what are their differences

SSL Alerts logo SSL Alerts

Free service to send SSL certificate expiration alerts

HTTP logo HTTP

is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.
  • SSL Alerts Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-15
  • HTTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-21

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SSL Alerts and HTTP)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
SSL Certificates
100 100%
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using SSL Alerts and HTTP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HTTP seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SSL Alerts mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of SSL Alerts yet. Tracking of SSL Alerts recommendations started around Mar 2021.

HTTP mentions (7)

  • Evolving the Web: Discovering the History of HTTP Versions
    HTTP/1.1 was such a game changer for the Internet that it works so well that even through two revisions, RFC 2616 published in June 1999 and RFC 7230– RFC 7235 published in June 2014, HTTP/1.1 was extremely stable until the release of HTTP/2.0 in 2014 — Nearly 18 years later. Before continuing to the next section about HTTP/2.0, let us revisit what journey HTTP/1.1 has been through. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Poll: Are client web requests sent to upstream servers or downstream servers?
    On the one hand, it just seems natural that "upstream" refers to the inbound request being sent from one system to another. It takes effort (connection pooling, throttling, retries, etc.) to make a request to an (upstream) dependency, just as it takes effort to swim upstream. The response is (usually) easy... Just return it... hence, "downstream". Recall the usual meaning of "upload" and "download". Upstream seems... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • How to cache TCP, SSL handshake on ALB?
    To me it sounds like you’ve not solved this as the config you’ve mentioned is about preventing “illegal” (none RFC7230 ) requests, it isn’t really related to the problem you posted. Source: over 2 years ago
  • HTTP Protocol Overview
    The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Show HN: Micro HTTP server in 22 lines of C
    It's neat, but I don't believe it is a compliant implementation of HTTP/1.1 (or 1.0). For example, it does not handle percent-encoded characters in the request URI.[1][2] [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.1.1 [2]: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.0/spec.html#Request-URI. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SSL Alerts and HTTP, you can also consider the following products

NakedSSL - Hassle-free SSL clothes for your naked domains.

mini_httpd - mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.

Secure My Website - A pain-free service to add SSL to your site, for non-geeks

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

redirectssl - Setup your naked (non-WWW) domain with an SSL and redirect it anywhere.

micro_httpd - micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.