Software Alternatives & Reviews

SourceHut VS Launchpad.net

Compare SourceHut VS Launchpad.net and see what are their differences

SourceHut logo SourceHut

Git and Mercurial hosting, mailing lists, bug tracking, continuous integration, and more

Launchpad.net logo Launchpad.net

Launchpad is a software collaboration platform by Canonical
  • SourceHut Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-17
  • Launchpad.net Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

SourceHut videos

System Crafters Live! - What is GNU? • Is Sourcehut the future? • Q&A

More videos:

  • Review - Building Natalie on OpenBSD with Sourcehut

Launchpad.net videos

Review: LaunchPad X vs MINI MK3 // Custom layout tutorial // Novation LaunchPad

More videos:

  • Review - Novation Launchpad MK2 Review
  • Review - LAUNCHPAD X – What is it and what can it do?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SourceHut and Launchpad.net)
Git
48 48%
52% 52
Code Collaboration
45 45%
55% 55
Project Management
38 38%
62% 62
VCS
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using SourceHut and Launchpad.net. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Launchpad.net might be a bit more popular than SourceHut. We know about 64 links to it since March 2021 and only 55 links to SourceHut. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SourceHut mentions (55)

  • Ask HN: What's Happenning with SourceHut?
    For anyone coming across this, a new page has been set up at https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Using Git Offline
    Do you know SourceHut? https://sourcehut.org/ I would be really curious to have your opinion about it as compared to how it was 14 years ago. I feel like SourceHut does a really good job helping on the tooling side (it's super easy to setup a mailing list). Also I find Aerc very cool for that. The author describes it here: https://drewdevault.com/2022/07/25/Code-review-with-aerc.html. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Email and Git = <3
    A few comments in-line, but I don't want to "sell" anything to you, so just FWIW. > The amount of "gotchas" in this process and the tooling required just to use git + email seems insane to me. The base system is really, really simple, but there are some common rules/guidelines that just help when working together, and those are required for forge based workflows too (or do you like a single commit touching a dozen... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Show HN: FlakeHub – Discover and publish Nix flakes
    > We're planning on expanding to support other forges, Just want to put in a request for SourceHut support in case it's not already on your list. Sometimes it gets overlooked in favor of the big corporate forges. https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Vim Boss – Neovim
    Https://sourcehut.org/ fits this pretty well. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
View more

Launchpad.net mentions (64)

  • Quickemu: Quickly run optimised Windows, macOS and Linux virtual machines
    I agree, but I think that model of GPG is not how it's used any more. I think nowadays people upload a one-shot CI key, which is used to sign builds. So you're basically saying "The usual machine built this". Which is good information, don't get me wrong, but it's much less secure than "John was logged into his laptop and entered the password for the key that signed this" So, you're right, that GPG verifies... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives
    You can use https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/, but that's no official Mozilla repository. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives
    As a user of the PPA packages (https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa), now I'm confused. Are these the same packages? Should I switch? I'd have appreciated at least a mention in the article. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Firefox Developer Edition and Beta: Try Out Mozilla's .deb Package
    There's also a PPA: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa Though you'll have to convince Ubuntu to prefer that instead of the snap. It's not hard, certainly easier than installing Debian which is probably still what I should have done. I think I used this guide: https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-deb-apt-ubuntu-22-04 Though what that doesn't tell you is that the snap... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Fedora Workstation 39
    Https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa A quick google will find plenty of sites telling you how to adjust the package versioning priorities to keep the MozillaTeam version of FF preferred over the crappy snap one. I still use Ubuntu desktop as my daily driver and server OS, and we have zero snaps installed on any of our systems. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SourceHut and Launchpad.net, you can also consider the following products

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

GitBucket - GitBucket is the easily installable open-source GitHub clone written with Scala.

SourceForge - The Complete Open-Source and Business Software Platform.