Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SourceHut VS Deployer

Compare SourceHut VS Deployer and see what are their differences

SourceHut logo SourceHut

Git and Mercurial hosting, mailing lists, bug tracking, continuous integration, and more

Deployer logo Deployer

Deployment Tool for PHP
  • SourceHut Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-17
  • Deployer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-23

SourceHut videos

System Crafters Live! - What is GNU? • Is Sourcehut the future? • Q&A

More videos:

  • Review - Building Natalie on OpenBSD with Sourcehut

Deployer videos

Modern Deployment Bag - Force Protector Gear Deployer 75 Bag - Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SourceHut and Deployer)
Git
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using SourceHut and Deployer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SourceHut should be more popular than Deployer. It has been mentiond 55 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SourceHut mentions (55)

  • Ask HN: What's Happenning with SourceHut?
    For anyone coming across this, a new page has been set up at https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Using Git Offline
    Do you know SourceHut? https://sourcehut.org/ I would be really curious to have your opinion about it as compared to how it was 14 years ago. I feel like SourceHut does a really good job helping on the tooling side (it's super easy to setup a mailing list). Also I find Aerc very cool for that. The author describes it here: https://drewdevault.com/2022/07/25/Code-review-with-aerc.html. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Email and Git = <3
    A few comments in-line, but I don't want to "sell" anything to you, so just FWIW. > The amount of "gotchas" in this process and the tooling required just to use git + email seems insane to me. The base system is really, really simple, but there are some common rules/guidelines that just help when working together, and those are required for forge based workflows too (or do you like a single commit touching a dozen... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Show HN: FlakeHub – Discover and publish Nix flakes
    > We're planning on expanding to support other forges, Just want to put in a request for SourceHut support in case it's not already on your list. Sometimes it gets overlooked in favor of the big corporate forges. https://sourcehut.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Vim Boss – Neovim
    Https://sourcehut.org/ fits this pretty well. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
View more

Deployer mentions (31)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SourceHut and Deployer, you can also consider the following products

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Buddy - The simplest CI/CD tool ever made, acclaimed by top developers worldwide. It uses delivery pipelines to build, test and deploy software. Pipelines are created with over 100 ready-to-use actions, that can be arranged in any way.

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

Capistrano - A remote server automation and deployment tool written in Ruby

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

AWS CodePipeline - Continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application updates