Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SmartGit VS AWS CodeCommit

Compare SmartGit VS AWS CodeCommit and see what are their differences

SmartGit logo SmartGit

SmartGit is a front-end for the distributed version control system Git and runs on Windows, Mac OS...

AWS CodeCommit logo AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure private Git repositories.
  • SmartGit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-24
  • AWS CodeCommit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-22

SmartGit features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    SmartGit provides an intuitive and graphical interface that is user-friendly, which makes it accessible for beginners as well as efficient for experienced users.
  • Cross-Platform
    Available on Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for different development environments.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Includes a comprehensive set of features for Git version control, such as commit history, branch management, and conflict resolution tools.
  • Integrations
    Supports integration with popular platforms like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, facilitating smooth workflow management.
  • SVN Support
    Includes support for Subversion (SVN) repositories, making it easier for teams transitioning from SVN to Git.
  • Professional Support
    Offers commercial support options, ensuring that professional teams can get timely assistance when needed.

Possible disadvantages of SmartGit

  • Cost
    While it offers a free version for non-commercial use, the commercial license can be expensive, potentially being a barrier for smaller teams or solo developers.
  • Complexity for Basic Users
    The rich feature set might be overwhelming for users who are only looking for basic Git functionalities.
  • Performance
    Can be resource-intensive and slower to load compared to some lightweight Git clients.
  • Learning Curve
    New users, particularly those unfamiliar with Git, may find there is a significant learning curve to fully leverage all features.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version is only for non-commercial use, which limits its utility for professionals and businesses who are looking for a zero-cost solution.

AWS CodeCommit features and specs

  • Scalability
    AWS CodeCommit scales automatically, so it can handle projects of all sizes without any need for manual intervention.
  • High Availability
    The service is hosted on AWS, which offers high availability and durability thanks to its reliable infrastructure.
  • Security
    AWS CodeCommit integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), providing fine-grained access control and encryption capabilities.
  • Cost Efficiency
    For small teams, CodeCommit is cost-effective as it doesn't charge for the first 5 active users per month.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like CodePipeline, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy, promoting a streamlined CI/CD pipeline.
  • Fully Managed
    Because AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed service, you don't need to worry about maintaining a version control server yourself.

Possible disadvantages of AWS CodeCommit

  • Learning Curve
    New users, especially those not familiar with AWS, might face a steep learning curve due to the complexity of AWS services.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more mature platforms like GitHub or GitLab, the ecosystem around AWS CodeCommit is relatively limited in terms of third-party integrations and extensions.
  • User Interface
    The web interface of CodeCommit is not as user-friendly or feature-rich as competitors like GitHub or Bitbucket.
  • Regional Availability
    While AWS CodeCommit is available in many AWS regions, it might not be available in all regions, limiting its use for some global teams.
  • Storage Limitations
    Though generally adequate for standard use cases, larger teams or heavily data-driven projects may find the repository storage limitations to be a constraint.

SmartGit videos

SmartGit's Distributed Reviews

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with SmartGit
  • Review - SmartGit's GitHub Integration

AWS CodeCommit videos

AWS Codecommit Hands On

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to AWS CodeCommit
  • Review - Introduction to AWS CodeCommit: Setting Up Permissions

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SmartGit and AWS CodeCommit)
Git
75 75%
25% 25
Git Tools
86 86%
14% 14
Code Collaboration
76 76%
24% 24
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using SmartGit and AWS CodeCommit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare SmartGit and AWS CodeCommit

SmartGit Reviews

Best Git GUI Clients of 2022: All Platforms Included
The tool lets you compare or merge files and edit them side-by-side. It can resolve merge conflicts by using the Conflict Solver. SmartGit also provides SSH client, an improved rebase performance and Git-Flow that allows you to configure branches without additional tools.
Boost Development Productivity With These 14 Git Clients for Windows and Mac
If you are looking for a cross-platform git GUI, you can try SmartGit. You can easily install the software on macOS, Linux, or Windows computers. Moreover, the tool runs smoothly on your device without slowing it down.
Source: geekflare.com
Best Git GUI Clients for Windows
The SmartGit free Git GUI allows users to perform all the tasks required to work with their repositories. It provides the possibility to view and edit files side-by-side and allows resolving merge conflicts automatically. With Git-Flow support, you can configure branches directly in the tool. There is no need to use any additional software.
Source: blog.devart.com

AWS CodeCommit Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
AWS CodeCommit eliminates the need for hosting, maintaining, backing up, and scaling your source control servers. It also allows you to customise access for each user to your repositories, with automatically encrypted files in transit. Additionally, it keeps your repositories highly available and accessible with a scalable, redundant, and durable architecture.
Top 7 GitHub Alternatives You Should Know (2024)
AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) to host secure, scalable, and private Git repositories.
Source: snappify.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS CodeCommit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SmartGit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of SmartGit yet. Tracking of SmartGit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

AWS CodeCommit mentions (22)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SmartGit and AWS CodeCommit, you can also consider the following products

GitKraken - The intuitive, fast, and beautiful cross-platform Git client.

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

SourceTree - Mac and Windows client for Mercurial and Git.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.