Table of contents
Scalability
AWS CodeCommit scales automatically, so it can handle projects of all sizes without any need for manual intervention.
High Availability
The service is hosted on AWS, which offers high availability and durability thanks to its reliable infrastructure.
Security
AWS CodeCommit integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), providing fine-grained access control and encryption capabilities.
Cost Efficiency
For small teams, CodeCommit is cost-effective as it doesn't charge for the first 5 active users per month.
Integration
Seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like CodePipeline, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy, promoting a streamlined CI/CD pipeline.
Fully Managed
Because AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed service, you don't need to worry about maintaining a version control server yourself.
Promote AWS CodeCommit. You can add any of these badges on your website.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if AWS CodeCommit is good.
Check the traffic stats of AWS CodeCommit on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of AWS CodeCommit on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of AWS CodeCommit's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of AWS CodeCommit on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about AWS CodeCommit on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
AWS CodeCommit: secure, highly scalable, managed source control service that hosts private Git repositories. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
AWS CodeCommit is AWS's hosted GitHub in the cloud. It is integrated with IAM and you should understand how different levels of permissions that can be granted to users of the service. Know what the AWSCodeCommitPowerUser policy is for. You can receive notifications via SNS to invoke downstream actions in AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodePipeline or other competing services. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
CodeCommit - 5 active users,50GB storage, and 10000 requests per month. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Build – Used for all CodeCommit repositories and CodePipelines that are deployed within the landing zone. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
PR-Agent offers extensive pull request functionalities across various git providers: GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket, CodeCommit, Azure DevOps, Gerrit. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
So that brings us to the next logical step. Invalidate only the things that have been changed. I am using CodeCommit as a source repository you can ask git for what files are changed:. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
AWS CodeCommit: secure, highly scalable, managed source control service that hosts private Git repositories. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
We treat these services in one group as they belong together from a strategic point of view. They have been around for a few years and the teams that built these are now involved in CodeCatalyst. CodeCatalyst partly uses them “under the hood”. CodeCommit is a managed git hosting, CodeBuild is a managed “build” system, CodeStar is a “project management” tool. CodePipeline allows combining multiple CodeBuild steps... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
I am using AWS CodeCommit as a source repository. The reason for this choice is that it integrates with AWS CodePipeline. We also want the ability to test our infrastructure. So I usually use feature branches to do that. Here the first challange appears. We only need 1 repository and a pipeline to deploy our infrastructure. But we also need a pipeline that deploys our feature branch. In CloudFormation you can do... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
AWS' CodeCommit doesn't support server side filtering? What the heck? Anyone else run across this? Source: over 2 years ago
AWS CodeCommit is a managed service for Git (just like Bitbucket, Github, Gitlab, .... It provides a hosted "git" environment that is encrypted at rest and can be accessed using usual Git clients. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
CodeCommit - 5 active users,50GB storage and 10000 request per month. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
AWS CodeCommit: secure, highly scalable, managed source control service that hosts private Git repositories. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Next I'll check the Pull Request code review, for this I'll associate my CodeCommit repository, it can take a couple of minutes to fully associate, but you can verify the status under the Settings of the repository, Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer tab. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Design for Operations You should implement your entire workload as code. The benefit is that you can apply the same engineering discipline that you use for application code to your infrastructure. Use version control system like AWS Codecommit to enable tracking of changes and releases, and use AWS Cloudformation for your infrastructure templates. It is recommendable to test and validate changes to help limit... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
AWS CodeCommit is a secure, highly scalable, managed source control service that hosts private Git repositories. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Want container orchestration, with automatic scaling out and in, using load balanced solutions, but don’t want to maintain it? Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) on Fargate is perfect! Running on Fargate you have no servers to maintain or have to worry about provisioning capacity, AWS takes care of it all for you, including scaling, load balancing, and maintaining the control plane. It’s simple to... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
AWS CodeCommit will provide the repository for storing our Laravel code. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
At the time of writing AWS CodeBuild supports repositories hosted on GitHub, BitBucket, Amazon S3 and AWS CodeCommit. For reference, we'll use GitHub for this tutorial. Once you've prepared a project containing the above files, you'll need to commit and push the changes to your remote repository. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
Use the Code Commit. Switch over to the Native AWS CI/CD services like Code Pipeline, Code Build and Code Deploy. This should be a part of the POC and the migration checklist. Any application migration is marked complete only after the pipeline is setup in AWS. People often miss this step when the migrating to the cloud. Then they have to struggle with transporting the binaries built on the premise. Don't waste an... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
AWS CodeCommit provides a fully-managed source control service for Git repositories. With its high performance, collaborative and secure structure, you can confidently use it for any project for storing source code or even binaries. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
AWS CodeCommit has garnered a varied response from the developer community, with opinions echoing the typical balance of advantages and challenges associated with a managed source control service. As a part of Amazon Web Services (AWS), CodeCommit offers distinct integration benefits with AWS services, making it a compelling choice for DevOps teams already invested in the AWS ecosystem.
1. Fully Managed Service: One of the most frequently mentioned advantages of AWS CodeCommit is its fully managed nature. Users appreciate the elimination of hosting, maintaining, backing up, and scaling their source control servers, which simplifies infrastructure management (AWS, 2024). For businesses and teams that prioritize operations efficiency and wish to offload the complexities of server management, this is a noteworthy benefit.
2. Security and Compliance: CodeCommit places a strong emphasis on security, with automatically encrypted files in transit and integrations with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for granular control over permissions. This is particularly advantageous for projects that demand robust security postures, and for organizations that align closely with AWS's security standards.
3. Seamless Integration: Integration with other AWS services, such as CodePipeline and CodeBuild, is another key strength. CodeCommit serves as a foundational component in AWS’s broader DevOps tool suite, facilitating CI/CD processes and enabling sophisticated automation workflows (AWS, DevSecOps Part 1). Additionally, the service supports third-party integration, extending its utility across different environments.
1. Learning Curve: Despite these strengths, some users report a learning curve associated with incorporating CodeCommit into established workflows, especially for teams transitioning from more universal tools like GitHub. Gaining proficiency in AWS-specific services such as CodePipeline and CodeBuild is imperative for maximizing the potential of CodeCommit (Migrating to AWS).
2. Limitations in Functionality: Certain limitations, such as the lack of server-side filtering, have been highlighted as frustrations, suggesting that while CodeCommit excels in AWS-centric functionality, it may fall short against some open-source tools regarding specific features (AWS CodeCommit doesn't support server side filtering?).
3. Broader Ecosystem Competition: In the crowded space of source control services, CodeCommit competes against both ubiquitous tools like GitHub and Bitbucket, as well as enterprise-level solutions like Azure DevOps. The decision to use CodeCommit often hinges on AWS ecosystem alignment rather than standalone considerations, which may not appeal to teams looking for agnostic solutions (The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives).
In summary, AWS CodeCommit presents a robust, secure, and integrated solution for managing Git repositories within the AWS environment. It appeals particularly to teams seeking to leverage AWS's broader suite of DevOps tools, offering them a streamlined, security-focused source control option. However, potential users should consider the service's limitations and evaluate it against their specific needs and existing workflows. Balancing these factors is crucial to fully harnessing the power of AWS CodeCommit in a rapidly evolving software development landscape.
Do you know an article comparing AWS CodeCommit to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is AWS CodeCommit good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss AWS CodeCommit here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
