Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Mercurial SCM VS AWS CodeCommit

Compare Mercurial SCM VS AWS CodeCommit and see what are their differences

Mercurial SCM logo Mercurial SCM

Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

AWS CodeCommit logo AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure private Git repositories.
  • Mercurial SCM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-17
  • AWS CodeCommit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-22

Mercurial SCM features and specs

  • Performance
    Mercurial is known for its speed and performance, especially with large repositories and complex histories. It is designed to be fast and efficient, which makes it suitable for large-scale projects.
  • Simplicity
    Mercurial has a simpler command set compared to other SCMs like Git. The straightforwardness of its commands can make it easier to learn and use, particularly for new users.
  • Cross-platform Support
    Mercurial is a cross-platform tool that works well on a variety of operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This makes it versatile for development teams using different environments.
  • Strong Documentation
    Mercurial offers comprehensive and well-structured documentation which can be very helpful for both beginners and advanced users. The documentation covers a wide range of topics from basics to more complex usage.
  • Branching Model
    Mercurial uses a simpler and more intuitive branching model compared to Git. This can make branch handling more straightforward, reducing the complexity for developers.

Possible disadvantages of Mercurial SCM

  • Smaller Community
    Mercurial has a smaller user base and community compared to Git. This might result in fewer third-party tools, plugins, and resources available for Mercurial.
  • Market Share
    Git has largely dominated the market share for SCM tools. This might make Mercurial less attractive for enterprises and developers who prefer widely-adopted tools with broad industry support.
  • Tool Integration
    Some software tools and services offer better integration with Git than with Mercurial. This can limit the choices for CI/CD pipelines or other development tools that are often built with Git compatibility first.
  • Complex History Management
    While Mercurial’s simpler commands are an advantage, it can make some complex history management tasks more challenging compared to Git, which has a more powerful set of tools for such purposes.
  • Feature Lag
    New features and updates in source control management tend to appear in Git before they make their way to Mercurial, if at all. This lag can be a disadvantage for teams looking to use the latest advancements in SCM.

AWS CodeCommit features and specs

  • Scalability
    AWS CodeCommit scales automatically, so it can handle projects of all sizes without any need for manual intervention.
  • High Availability
    The service is hosted on AWS, which offers high availability and durability thanks to its reliable infrastructure.
  • Security
    AWS CodeCommit integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), providing fine-grained access control and encryption capabilities.
  • Cost Efficiency
    For small teams, CodeCommit is cost-effective as it doesn't charge for the first 5 active users per month.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like CodePipeline, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy, promoting a streamlined CI/CD pipeline.
  • Fully Managed
    Because AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed service, you don't need to worry about maintaining a version control server yourself.

Possible disadvantages of AWS CodeCommit

  • Learning Curve
    New users, especially those not familiar with AWS, might face a steep learning curve due to the complexity of AWS services.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more mature platforms like GitHub or GitLab, the ecosystem around AWS CodeCommit is relatively limited in terms of third-party integrations and extensions.
  • User Interface
    The web interface of CodeCommit is not as user-friendly or feature-rich as competitors like GitHub or Bitbucket.
  • Regional Availability
    While AWS CodeCommit is available in many AWS regions, it might not be available in all regions, limiting its use for some global teams.
  • Storage Limitations
    Though generally adequate for standard use cases, larger teams or heavily data-driven projects may find the repository storage limitations to be a constraint.

Mercurial SCM videos

No Mercurial SCM videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

AWS CodeCommit videos

AWS Codecommit Hands On

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to AWS CodeCommit
  • Review - Introduction to AWS CodeCommit: Setting Up Permissions

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Mercurial SCM and AWS CodeCommit)
Git
70 70%
30% 30
Code Collaboration
76 76%
24% 24
Git Tools
74 74%
26% 26
Version Control
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Mercurial SCM and AWS CodeCommit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Mercurial SCM and AWS CodeCommit

Mercurial SCM Reviews

We have no reviews of Mercurial SCM yet.
Be the first one to post

AWS CodeCommit Reviews

The Top 10 GitHub Alternatives
AWS CodeCommit eliminates the need for hosting, maintaining, backing up, and scaling your source control servers. It also allows you to customise access for each user to your repositories, with automatically encrypted files in transit. Additionally, it keeps your repositories highly available and accessible with a scalable, redundant, and durable architecture.
Top 7 GitHub Alternatives You Should Know (2024)
AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) to host secure, scalable, and private Git repositories.
Source: snappify.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS CodeCommit seems to be a lot more popular than Mercurial SCM. While we know about 22 links to AWS CodeCommit, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Mercurial SCM. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Mercurial SCM mentions (2)

  • Why so rude?
    Many people have asked me to write a blog post on my preference of Mercurial over Git and so far I've refused and will continue doing so for the foreseeable future. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Mercurial Paris Conference will take place on April 05-07 2023 in Paris France. Call for papers are open!
    Mercurial Paris Conference 2023 is a professional and technical conference around mercurial scm, a free, distributed source control management tool. Source: over 2 years ago

AWS CodeCommit mentions (22)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Mercurial SCM and AWS CodeCommit, you can also consider the following products

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.

GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.

GitKraken - The intuitive, fast, and beautiful cross-platform Git client.

Apache Subversion - Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.

Azure DevOps - Visual Studio dev tools & services make app development easy for any platform & language. Try our Mac & Windows code editor, IDE, or Azure DevOps for free.