SimpleHTTPServer VS Cherokee

Compare SimpleHTTPServer VS Cherokee and see what are their differences

LibHunt

LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

SimpleHTTPServer

Serve a single directory over HTTP

Cherokee

High-performance web server

Landing page //
2021-09-22

Landing page //
2023-01-25

SimpleHTTPServer

Website: docs.python.org
$ Details: -

Edit details

Cherokee

Website: cherokee-project.com
$ Details

Edit details

SimpleHTTPServer features and specs

Ease of Use
SimpleHTTPServer is extremely easy to use, requiring just a single command to spin up a basic web server, making it ideal for quick testing and development purposes.
No Installation Required
As a standard module in Python 2.7, SimpleHTTPServer does not require any additional installation processes, reducing setup time for developers.
Platform Independent
Being part of Python's standard library, it is platform-independent and can run on any system that supports Python.

Possible disadvantages of SimpleHTTPServer

Security
SimpleHTTPServer lacks security features like HTTPS, authentication mechanisms, and protection against vulnerabilities, which makes it unsuitable for production environments.
Limited Functionality
Designed for serving static files, SimpleHTTPServer lacks advanced functionalities like CGI scripting or integration with databases needed for dynamic content serving.
Obsolete
Being a part of Python 2.7 which is no longer maintained, SimpleHTTPServer is obsolete, and users are encouraged to use Python 3, specifically the http.server module for better functionality and support.
Single Threaded
By default, SimpleHTTPServer handles requests sequentially in a single-threaded manner, which can result in performance bottlenecks when handling multiple requests simultaneously.

Cherokee features and specs

User-Friendly Interface
Cherokee offers an intuitive web-based user interface, making it easier for system administrators to configure and manage the server without needing to rely heavily on the command line.
Lightweight and Fast
Cherokee is known for being lightweight, which can lead to improved performance and faster response times compared to heavier web servers.
Flexible Configuration
The server provides a flexible configuration system that supports a variety of scenarios, including virtual hosting, load balancing, and support for different web technologies.
Comprehensive Protocol Support
Cherokee supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP/2, FastCGI, SCGI, and uWSGI, providing broad compatibility with various web applications.

Possible disadvantages of Cherokee

Smaller Community
Compared to more popular web servers like Apache or Nginx, Cherokee has a smaller community, which can lead to fewer resources, such as tutorials, forums, and third-party modules.
Less Frequent Updates
Cherokee is not updated as frequently as some other web servers, which may impact the availability of timely security patches and new features.
Limited Enterprise Adoption
Due to its smaller market presence, Cherokee is less commonly used in enterprise environments, which can lead to compatibility or support concerns in mixed technology stacks.
Potential Stability Issues
Some users report encountering stability issues when using Cherokee in high-demand environments, which can pose a risk for mission-critical applications.