Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

nanoweb VS SimpleHTTPServer

Compare nanoweb VS SimpleHTTPServer and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

nanoweb logo nanoweb

Nanoweb is an HTTP server written in PHP, designed to be small, secure, and extensible.

SimpleHTTPServer logo SimpleHTTPServer

Serve a single directory over HTTP
  • nanoweb Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-04
  • SimpleHTTPServer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22

nanoweb features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

SimpleHTTPServer features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    SimpleHTTPServer is extremely easy to use, requiring just a single command to spin up a basic web server, making it ideal for quick testing and development purposes.
  • No Installation Required
    As a standard module in Python 2.7, SimpleHTTPServer does not require any additional installation processes, reducing setup time for developers.
  • Platform Independent
    Being part of Python's standard library, it is platform-independent and can run on any system that supports Python.

Possible disadvantages of SimpleHTTPServer

  • Security
    SimpleHTTPServer lacks security features like HTTPS, authentication mechanisms, and protection against vulnerabilities, which makes it unsuitable for production environments.
  • Limited Functionality
    Designed for serving static files, SimpleHTTPServer lacks advanced functionalities like CGI scripting or integration with databases needed for dynamic content serving.
  • Obsolete
    Being a part of Python 2.7 which is no longer maintained, SimpleHTTPServer is obsolete, and users are encouraged to use Python 3, specifically the http.server module for better functionality and support.
  • Single Threaded
    By default, SimpleHTTPServer handles requests sequentially in a single-threaded manner, which can result in performance bottlenecks when handling multiple requests simultaneously.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to nanoweb and SimpleHTTPServer)

nanoweb

SimpleHTTPServer

Web And Application Servers
52 52%
Web And Application Servers
48% 48
Web Servers
50 50%
Web Servers
50% 50
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
Application Server
0 0%
Application Server
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using nanoweb and SimpleHTTPServer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing nanoweb and SimpleHTTPServer, you can also consider the following products

lighttpd - A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Web Tool Kit Online - Web Tool Kit Online is a website that provides an online tool for developers helping them to develop an application in C++ without any hurdle.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Wt - Wt (pronounced as witty) is a C++ library for developing web applications.

Loading...