Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SideCI V.2 VS PullRequest.com

Compare SideCI V.2 VS PullRequest.com and see what are their differences

SideCI V.2 logo SideCI V.2

GitHub Integrated Automated Code Review Service

PullRequest.com logo PullRequest.com

Code review as a service
  • SideCI V.2 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-13
  • PullRequest.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-06

PullRequest combines automation with a network of on-demand reviewers from companies like Google, Dropbox, and Amazon. With thousands of expert reviewers, we can review projects of any size or technical area. Integrated directly into GitHub, Bitbucket, and Gitlab.

PullRequest.com

$ Details
paid Free Trial $99.0 / Monthly (for individual developers)
Platforms
iOS Android C C++ .Net PHP Objective-C Magento Erlang Scala Elixir TypeScript Go Swift Groovy Ruby Perl JavaScript Java Python

SideCI V.2 features and specs

  • Automated Code Review
    SideCI V.2 offers automated code review capabilities, allowing developers to maintain code quality with minimal manual effort.
  • Multi-language Support
    Supports a variety of programming languages, making it a flexible tool for diverse codebases.
  • Integration with Platforms
    Easily integrates with popular platforms like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, streamlining the code review process.
  • Customizable Configurations
    Offers extensive configuration options to tailor the code review process to specific needs and project requirements.
  • Inline Commenting
    Provides inline comments on pull requests, making it easier for developers to address issues directly in the context of the code.

Possible disadvantages of SideCI V.2

  • Pricing
    Can be expensive for small teams or individual developers, particularly if the full suite of features is not needed.
  • Complex Setup for Beginners
    Initial setup can be complex for users not already familiar with continuous integration and code review tools.
  • Limited Customer Support
    Users report that customer support can be slow to respond, which could be problematic for critical issues.
  • Performance Overhead
    The tool can introduce performance overhead in the development workflow, particularly for larger projects.
  • Learning Curve
    May have a steep learning curve for teams not previously using automated code review tools.

PullRequest.com features and specs

  • Expert Code Reviewers
    PullRequest.com provides access to a network of experienced code reviewers with expertise in various programming languages and technologies, ensuring that your code is thoroughly and insightfully reviewed.
  • Improved Code Quality
    By leveraging professional code reviewers, the platform helps enhance code quality by identifying potential bugs, suggesting improvements, and ensuring adherence to coding standards.
  • Scalability
    The service can scale with your team's needs, whether you require sporadic code reviews for small projects or consistent evaluations for large development teams.
  • Time-Saving
    Outsourcing code reviews can save developers and teams significant time, allowing them to focus on other important tasks and speeding up the development process.
  • Objective Feedback
    External reviewers can provide unbiased, objective feedback without internal team dynamics influencing the review process, leading to more open and honest evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of PullRequest.com

  • Cost
    Using PullRequest.com may introduce additional expenses, which could be a concern for startups or companies with limited budgets compared to in-house reviews.
  • Security Concerns
    Sharing code externally may raise security concerns, especially for companies handling sensitive or proprietary information, despite security measures in place.
  • Integration Overhead
    Integrating an external review process into existing workflows may require adjustments, which could initially disrupt established development processes.
  • Variable Quality
    While many reviewers are highly skilled, the quality of reviews can vary depending on the reviewer assigned, potentially leading to inconsistent review quality.
  • Limited Context
    External reviewers may lack full context of the project details and organizational goals, which might impact the relevance of their suggestions compared to an in-house team.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SideCI V.2 and PullRequest.com)
Developer Tools
33 33%
67% 67
Code Coverage
29 29%
71% 71
Code Quality
35 35%
65% 65
Code Review
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using SideCI V.2 and PullRequest.com. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PullRequest.com should be more popular than SideCI V.2. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SideCI V.2 mentions (1)

PullRequest.com mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Co-Founder? Seeking Co-Founder?
    I am a tech guy. Have 15+ years experience building backend systems. Now, I build user facing websites/services and release them. I have no knowledge of marketing/sales, so if you are a non tech guy who wants to do some fun projects, hit me up. Email in profile. Currently, I am working on a website where people can post their code and ask for feedback. (Something http://pullrequest.com/) Note that these are mostly... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Anyone has previously hired a programmer on Fiverr?
    Reviewing the code will be another hurdle for you. If you don't stay on top of this you will end up with an expensive POS. Maybe your friend can just do the code reviews for a cut? Otherwise, try something like pullrequest.com (code review as a service). Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SideCI V.2 and PullRequest.com, you can also consider the following products

GitHub + Slack Integration - Full visibility into your GitHub projects right inside Slack

codebeat - Automated code review for Swift

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Code Review by Codementor - Get an expert to review your code on-demand

Mergify - Stop merging your pull requests manually