Software Alternatives & Reviews

Security Headers VS CryptoLyzer

Compare Security Headers VS CryptoLyzer and see what are their differences

Security Headers logo Security Headers

Quickly and easily assess the security of your HTTP response headers.

CryptoLyzer logo CryptoLyzer

Fast and flexible server cryptographic (TLS/SSL) settings analyzer library for Python 2.7/3.4+ with CLI
  • Security Headers Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04
  • CryptoLyzer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-25

Security Headers videos

HTTP Security Headers | Part 01

More videos:

  • Review - HTTP Security Headers In Action - Sven Morgenroth - PSW #652

CryptoLyzer videos

CyberFM (CYFM) Review #CryptoLyzer

More videos:

  • Review - Celsius (CEL) Review #CryptoLyzer
  • Review - Harmony Network (ONE) Review #CryptoLyzer

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Security Headers and CryptoLyzer)
Web Application Security
78 78%
22% 22
Security
76 76%
24% 24
Web And Mobile Application Security
Cyber Security
60 60%
40% 40

User comments

Share your experience with using Security Headers and CryptoLyzer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Security Headers seems to be a lot more popular than CryptoLyzer. While we know about 57 links to Security Headers, we've tracked only 1 mention of CryptoLyzer. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Security Headers mentions (57)

  • Why is text of sumissions in low-contrast grey on HN?
    There are so many accessibility issues on Hacker News! Ways to avoid the same mistakes? Easy... 1 - Make sure everyone involved from designers to developers to content creators to testers to... Whatever your village has in it... Has knowledge of WCAG. (New standards out a few weeks ago!) WCAG is the de facto law of the land now, and businesses are liable from damages if they don't make efforts to ensure all users... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Show HN: Year old launches SaaS platform today. Seeks feedback
    Few minor accessibility issues. https://wave.webaim.org/report#/https://propbox.co/ Bunch of front-end security issues. Some of these are trivial, but also... Why not just knock them out? https://securityheaders.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fpropbox.co%2F&followRedirects=on The Privacy page is a nightmare, as others have pointed out. Why do this? Won't work with screen readers, won't let users copy text... it's bad.... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Hacker News evading criticism by selectively adding noreferrer to certain links
    FWIW HN sets the Referrer-Policy header [1] to origin [2] but I have no idea how many browsers honor that. [1] - https://scotthelme.co.uk/a-new-security-header-referrer-policy/ [2] - https://securityheaders.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombinator.com%2F&hide=on&followRedirects=on. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Security headers - what they are and how to use them 🔒
    I was recently tasked with improving the security rating on one of our websites. This involved a couple of things but the thing I want to focus on in this post is security headers. We scanned the site here and were initially given a rating of 'E'. Not good. So one of the recommendations was to add security headers which are headers contained in the HTTP response and can provide various different security benefits,... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Google No Longer Automatically Indexes Websites – WTF?
    Google has to know about the site before it can index it. Set up the sitemap, then link the sitemap in from Google's Search Console Tools, and install Google Analytics. This will help Google pick up that your site exists. Make sure your robots.txt file is configured to allow crawlers. Make sure your pages aren't inadvertently NOINDEX'd. SEO isn't as relevant as it used to be, but all this stuff should be part of... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
View more

CryptoLyzer mentions (1)

  • DHEat Attack
    You can also use CryptoLyzer[1] to audit your TLS (not just HTTPS, but SMTP, IMAP, ...) and SSH servers if you do not want to use SaaS solutions. There are another tools (open source and SaaS) on OWASP Transport Layer Protection Cheat Sheet page[2]. [1] https://gitlab.com/coroner/cryptolyzer. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Security Headers and CryptoLyzer, you can also consider the following products

Mozilla Observatory - The Mozilla Observatory is a project designed to help developers, system administrators, and security professionals configure their sites safely and securely.

Qualys SSL Server Test - This free online service performs a deep analysis of the configuration of any SSL web server on the public Internet.

Cloud Cultivator - Comprehensive SSL/TLS monitoring

Hardenize - Hardenize provides a comprehensive and free assessment of web site network and security configuration.

Scanigma - Scanigma offers a comprehensive solution that includes in-depth analysis, evaluation, and reporting of security settings, specific recommendations, sample configurations, and ongoing monitoring.

CryptCheck - CryptCheck is a Ruby toolbox that help anybody to check for cryptography security level and best practices compliance.