Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Security Headers VS Hardenize

Compare Security Headers VS Hardenize and see what are their differences

Security Headers logo Security Headers

Quickly and easily assess the security of your HTTP response headers.

Hardenize logo Hardenize

Hardenize provides a comprehensive and free assessment of web site network and security configuration.
  • Security Headers Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04
  • Hardenize Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04

Security Headers features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Security Headers significantly improve your web application's security by protecting against common vulnerabilities like XSS, Clickjacking, and MIME sniffing.
  • Quick Assessment
    The tool provides a fast evaluation of the headers implemented on your website, helping you quickly identify missing or misconfigured headers.
  • Easy to Use
    Security Headers is user-friendly and does not require advanced technical skills, making it accessible for both developers and security professionals.
  • Free Tool
    The service is free to use, allowing widespread access and enabling users to improve web security without financial barriers.

Possible disadvantages of Security Headers

  • Limited Scope
    Security Headers focuses only on HTTP headers, which means it does not provide a comprehensive security assessment of the entire application or network.
  • No Dynamic Content Testing
    The tool does not test dynamic content and runtime security issues, potentially overlooking vulnerabilities that occur only after initial page load.
  • No Detailed Remediation Guidance
    While the tool identifies missing headers, it does not provide detailed guidance on how to implement or configure them, requiring further research.
  • Potential for False Sense of Security
    Relying solely on this tool may lead to a false sense of security, as there are many other security aspects that need to be addressed to secure a web application fully.

Hardenize features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analysis
    Hardenize provides an in-depth analysis of website security, offering insights into various aspects such as HTTPS, DNS, email, and more, making it a robust solution for understanding overall security posture.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which allows users, including those who may not be highly technical, to easily access and interpret the security information provided.
  • Regular Monitoring
    Hardenize offers continuous monitoring of your domain and provides updates about any changes or potential issues, ensuring that you are always informed about the security status.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Reports generated by Hardenize are detailed and provide actionable insights, enabling users to pinpoint and address specific security vulnerabilities effectively.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The platform supports integration with other security tools and systems, enhancing its functionality and allowing for a more streamlined security operations process.

Possible disadvantages of Hardenize

  • Service Costs
    While Hardenize provides substantial features, it may be cost-prohibitive for smaller organizations or individuals who are operating on a tight budget.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, some users might experience a learning curve in utilizing all of Hardenize’s features to their full potential, particularly if they do not have prior experience with security tools.
  • Limited Free Tier
    The free version of Hardenize comes with limitations on the number of domains that can be analyzed, which might not be sufficient for users needing to monitor multiple websites.
  • Dependence on Internet Connectivity
    Like many online services, Hardenize requires a reliable internet connection to function optimally, which could be a limitation in areas with poor internet infrastructure.

Security Headers videos

HTTP Security Headers | Part 01

More videos:

  • Review - HTTP Security Headers In Action - Sven Morgenroth - PSW #652

Hardenize videos

App Highlight: Hardenize

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Security Headers and Hardenize)
Web Application Security
65 65%
35% 35
Security
63 63%
37% 37
Web And Mobile Application Security
Cyber Security
41 41%
59% 59

User comments

Share your experience with using Security Headers and Hardenize. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Security Headers should be more popular than Hardenize. It has been mentiond 59 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Security Headers mentions (59)

  • 🛡️ Mastering Security HTTP Headers
    Regular Audits: Use tools like Mozilla Observatory or Security Headers to regularly check your headers. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Is your website Secure check out
    What's better about this vs. Mozilla Observatory. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/observatory (formerly https://observatory.mozilla.org/) Or Security Headers? https://securityheaders.com/ Or VENOM? https://github.com/oshp/oshp-validator Applaud the effort, these are things that more devs should be aware of when building websites... Hey some specific feedback... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Why is text of sumissions in low-contrast grey on HN?
    There are so many accessibility issues on Hacker News! Ways to avoid the same mistakes? Easy... 1 - Make sure everyone involved from designers to developers to content creators to testers to... Whatever your village has in it... Has knowledge of WCAG. (New standards out a few weeks ago!) WCAG is the de facto law of the land now, and businesses are liable from damages if they don't make efforts to ensure all users... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Year old launches SaaS platform today. Seeks feedback
    Few minor accessibility issues. https://wave.webaim.org/report#/https://propbox.co/ Bunch of front-end security issues. Some of these are trivial, but also... Why not just knock them out? https://securityheaders.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fpropbox.co%2F&followRedirects=on The Privacy page is a nightmare, as others have pointed out. Why do this? Won't work with screen readers, won't let users copy text... it's bad.... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Hacker News evading criticism by selectively adding noreferrer to certain links
    FWIW HN sets the Referrer-Policy header [1] to origin [2] but I have no idea how many browsers honor that. [1] - https://scotthelme.co.uk/a-new-security-header-referrer-policy/ [2] - https://securityheaders.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombinator.com%2F&hide=on&followRedirects=on. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

Hardenize mentions (6)

  • Skiff Mail
    Hey, I'm looking for an in-depth analysis of the security Skiff Mail. Pros and cons, arguments for and against, all the stuff. Couldn't find anything conclusive online (since it's relatively new) except what I could dig myself: WHOIS data, hardenize.com results, etc. Source: over 2 years ago
  • I must announce the immediate end of service of SSLPing
    Https://hardenize.com is quite pretty, but there's nowhere near $999/mo of value in it for me! - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • I must announce the immediate end of service of SSLPing
    It does a little more and little less. More: Enter a list of (sub-) domains and get informed via email when "SSL things" change (for better or for worst), or your https certificate is about to expire. Less: No fancy pansy "report" Personally I prefer https://hardenize.com nowadays, over ssllabs for these kind of queries. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • If the email I sent is in the Sent box, did it 100% get delivered?
    If you have a custom email with ProtonMail you can check your setup on hardenize.com. That's what I use to make sure everything is set up correctly. Source: about 3 years ago
  • CryptoLyzer: A comprehensive cryptographic settings analyzer
    There are many notable open-source projects (SSLyze, CipherScan, testssl.sh, tls-scan, …) and several SaaS solutions (CryptCheck, CypherCraft, Hardenize, ImmuniWeb, Mozilla Observatory, SSL Labs, …) to do a security setting analysis, especially when we are talking about TLS, which is the most common and popular cryptographic protocol. However, most of these tools heavily depend on one or more versions of one or... - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Security Headers and Hardenize, you can also consider the following products

Mozilla Observatory - The Mozilla Observatory is a project designed to help developers, system administrators, and security professionals configure their sites safely and securely.

Qualys SSL Server Test - This free online service performs a deep analysis of the configuration of any SSL web server on the public Internet.

Scanigma - Scanigma offers a comprehensive solution that includes in-depth analysis, evaluation, and reporting of security settings, specific recommendations, sample configurations, and ongoing monitoring.

CryptoLyzer - Fast and flexible server cryptographic (TLS/SSL) settings analyzer library for Python 2.7/3.4+ with CLI

CryptCheck - CryptCheck is a Ruby toolbox that help anybody to check for cryptography security level and best practices compliance.

CipherScan - Cipherscan tests the ordering of the SSL/TLS ciphers on a given target, for all major versions of SSL and TLS.