Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Security Headers VS CryptCheck

Compare Security Headers VS CryptCheck and see what are their differences

Security Headers logo Security Headers

Quickly and easily assess the security of your HTTP response headers.

CryptCheck logo CryptCheck

CryptCheck is a Ruby toolbox that help anybody to check for cryptography security level and best practices compliance.
  • Security Headers Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04
  • CryptCheck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04

Security Headers features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Security Headers significantly improve your web application's security by protecting against common vulnerabilities like XSS, Clickjacking, and MIME sniffing.
  • Quick Assessment
    The tool provides a fast evaluation of the headers implemented on your website, helping you quickly identify missing or misconfigured headers.
  • Easy to Use
    Security Headers is user-friendly and does not require advanced technical skills, making it accessible for both developers and security professionals.
  • Free Tool
    The service is free to use, allowing widespread access and enabling users to improve web security without financial barriers.

Possible disadvantages of Security Headers

  • Limited Scope
    Security Headers focuses only on HTTP headers, which means it does not provide a comprehensive security assessment of the entire application or network.
  • No Dynamic Content Testing
    The tool does not test dynamic content and runtime security issues, potentially overlooking vulnerabilities that occur only after initial page load.
  • No Detailed Remediation Guidance
    While the tool identifies missing headers, it does not provide detailed guidance on how to implement or configure them, requiring further research.
  • Potential for False Sense of Security
    Relying solely on this tool may lead to a false sense of security, as there are many other security aspects that need to be addressed to secure a web application fully.

CryptCheck features and specs

  • Free and Open Source
    CryptCheck is a free and open source tool, which allows users to freely use, modify, and distribute the software, fostering transparency and community collaboration.
  • Comprehensive TLS Analysis
    It provides a comprehensive analysis of TLS configurations by checking for known vulnerabilities and misconfigurations, ensuring that users receive a detailed report on the security posture of their cryptographic protocols.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool offers an accessible and straightforward interface, making it easy for users to run checks and understand the results without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Regular Updates
    CryptCheck is regularly updated to account for new vulnerabilities and changes in the TLS landscape, ensuring users can keep abreast of the latest security standards and recommendations.

Possible disadvantages of CryptCheck

  • Limited Scope
    The tool specifically focuses on TLS security analysis, which may limit its utility for users who need a more comprehensive security assessment beyond cryptographic protocols.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running detailed analyses on multiple sites or complex systems might require substantial resources, which can be a limitation for users with constrained computational capacities.
  • Potential False Positives
    As with many automated security tools, there's a risk of false positives, which can lead to unnecessary concerns and require manual verification.
  • Dependent on Up-to-Date Information
    While CryptCheck is regularly updated, it relies on current cryptographic research and threat intelligence; potential delays in these updates might expose users to unrecognized vulnerabilities.

Security Headers videos

HTTP Security Headers | Part 01

More videos:

  • Review - HTTP Security Headers In Action - Sven Morgenroth - PSW #652

CryptCheck videos

No CryptCheck videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Security Headers and CryptCheck)
Web Application Security
77 77%
23% 23
Security
74 74%
26% 26
Web And Mobile Application Security
Cyber Security
49 49%
51% 51

User comments

Share your experience with using Security Headers and CryptCheck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Security Headers seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 59 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Security Headers mentions (59)

  • 🛡️ Mastering Security HTTP Headers
    Regular Audits: Use tools like Mozilla Observatory or Security Headers to regularly check your headers. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Is your website Secure check out
    What's better about this vs. Mozilla Observatory. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/observatory (formerly https://observatory.mozilla.org/) Or Security Headers? https://securityheaders.com/ Or VENOM? https://github.com/oshp/oshp-validator Applaud the effort, these are things that more devs should be aware of when building websites... Hey some specific feedback... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Why is text of sumissions in low-contrast grey on HN?
    There are so many accessibility issues on Hacker News! Ways to avoid the same mistakes? Easy... 1 - Make sure everyone involved from designers to developers to content creators to testers to... Whatever your village has in it... Has knowledge of WCAG. (New standards out a few weeks ago!) WCAG is the de facto law of the land now, and businesses are liable from damages if they don't make efforts to ensure all users... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Year old launches SaaS platform today. Seeks feedback
    Few minor accessibility issues. https://wave.webaim.org/report#/https://propbox.co/ Bunch of front-end security issues. Some of these are trivial, but also... Why not just knock them out? https://securityheaders.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fpropbox.co%2F&followRedirects=on The Privacy page is a nightmare, as others have pointed out. Why do this? Won't work with screen readers, won't let users copy text... it's bad.... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Hacker News evading criticism by selectively adding noreferrer to certain links
    FWIW HN sets the Referrer-Policy header [1] to origin [2] but I have no idea how many browsers honor that. [1] - https://scotthelme.co.uk/a-new-security-header-referrer-policy/ [2] - https://securityheaders.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombinator.com%2F&hide=on&followRedirects=on. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

CryptCheck mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CryptCheck yet. Tracking of CryptCheck recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Security Headers and CryptCheck, you can also consider the following products

Mozilla Observatory - The Mozilla Observatory is a project designed to help developers, system administrators, and security professionals configure their sites safely and securely.

Qualys SSL Server Test - This free online service performs a deep analysis of the configuration of any SSL web server on the public Internet.

Scanigma - Scanigma offers a comprehensive solution that includes in-depth analysis, evaluation, and reporting of security settings, specific recommendations, sample configurations, and ongoing monitoring.

Hardenize - Hardenize provides a comprehensive and free assessment of web site network and security configuration.

CryptoLyzer - Fast and flexible server cryptographic (TLS/SSL) settings analyzer library for Python 2.7/3.4+ with CLI

Cloud Cultivator - Comprehensive SSL/TLS monitoring