Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RunsOn VS Actionsflow

Compare RunsOn VS Actionsflow and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

RunsOn logo RunsOn

Access the fastest and cheapest self-hosted runners on the market with a one-line change. Easily installable in your own AWS account. x64 and arm64 architectures supported.

Actionsflow logo Actionsflow

Free Zapier alternative based on Github Actions
  • RunsOn 10x cheaper GitHub Action runners
    10x cheaper GitHub Action runners //
    2024-01-23
  • RunsOn Cheaper AND faster than BuildJet / Warpbuild / GitHub
    Cheaper AND faster than BuildJet / Warpbuild / GitHub //
    2024-01-23

Cheap runners are just one part of the equation: nobody likes slow runs, even if it's cheap.

RunsOn gives you access to some of the fastest machines on the market, thanks to AWS extensive hardware selection.

Which makes RunsOn the fastest provider of self-hosted, fully ephemeral runners on the market.

We automatically build and publish copies of the official runner images at most 24h after their official release, so that you can be certain that your workflows will always work on either GitHub runners, or your own RunsOn runners.

  • Actionsflow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-10-01

RunsOn

$ Details
freemium €300.0 / Annually
Platforms
AWS GitHub
Release Date
2024 January

Actionsflow

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

RunsOn features and specs

  • Ephemeral self-hosted runners
  • Autoscaling
  • Pricing
    10x cheaper than competition

Actionsflow features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Actionsflow provides a user-friendly interface that simplifies the automation of workflows through GitHub Actions, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Allows seamless integration with various services and APIs, enabling users to automate tasks across multiple platforms efficiently.
  • Cost-effective
    As it utilizes GitHub Actions, users can leverage the free tier of GitHub services, making it a cost-effective solution for automating workflows.
  • Flexibility
    Provides flexibility in defining workflows, accommodating custom scripts and logic to suit specific needs and scenarios.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, users can contribute to and modify the codebase, fostering a collaborative community and allowing customization to fit their needs.

Possible disadvantages of Actionsflow

  • Complexity in Advanced Use
    While it's user-friendly for basic tasks, configuring more complex workflows might require a deeper understanding of GitHub Actions syntax and YAML.
  • Limited Offline Support
    As a web-based tool, it requires an internet connection to access GitHub, which might be a limitation for users needing offline capabilities.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    Users are dependent on GitHub's reliability and any limitations of its Actions service, which could affect workflow execution during an outage.
  • Steeper Learning Curve for Non-Developers
    Despite its ease of use, non-developers might face a learning curve initially, especially when dealing with YAML and version control through GitHub.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RunsOn and Actionsflow)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Service Automation
0 0%
100% 100
GitHub
100 100%
0% 0
Automation
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing RunsOn and Actionsflow.

What makes your product unique?

RunsOn's answer

10x cheaper than GitHub official runners. Runs in your own AWS account. More secure than sharing your secrets with other third-party tools like BuildJet or Warpbuild.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

RunsOn's answer

Cheap, fast, on-premise alternative to maintaining self-hosted runners.

How would you describe your primary audience?

RunsOn's answer

CTO / Senior developers

What's the story behind your product?

RunsOn's answer

Built a similar product for one of my clients, reduced CI build cost by 10 times, and improve build speed from 1h to 20min.

User comments

Share your experience with using RunsOn and Actionsflow. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RunsOn seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RunsOn mentions (6)

  • Managed, self-hosted Arm runners for GitHub Actions using AWS Graviton Processors
    RunsOn is a self-hosted runner manager for GitHub Actions that you can install in your own AWS account. It will automatically spawn EC2 VMs as self-hosted runners for your GitHub Actions workflows. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Ask HN: What are you working on (August 2024)?
    I'm working on https://runs-on.com, a self-hosted solution to get 10x cheaper GitHub Actions runners with support for Linux x64 and arm64. This month I've been refining Windows support and hopefully this gets fully shipped before Aug 31st! - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Ask HN: Any CI/CD SaaS Solutions for ARM?
    You could also be interested in https://runs-on.com. Must be installed in your AWS account (1-click cloudformation template), and then you can use any instance type offered by AWS. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • GitHub now provides Arm-based runners
    > We were using self-hosted runners which were not as efficient as we thought so we spawned EC2 instances and connected them to the github network to be runners, but we had such an amount of issues that we wanted to go back to non-self hosted For those hitting that same kind of issue (and you are many), you should check out my product https://runs-on.com. 1-click install, 1-click upgrades, and from 7x to 16x... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Making EC2 boot time 8x faster
    > while we can boot the Actions runner within 5 seconds of a job starting, it can take GitHub 10+ seconds to actually deliver that job to the runner This. I went the same route with regards to boot time optimisations for [1] (cleaning up the AMI, cloud-init, etc.), and can boot a VM from cold in 15s (I can't rely on prewarming pools of machines -- even stopped -- since RunsOn doesn't share machines with multiple... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
View more

Actionsflow mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Actionsflow yet. Tracking of Actionsflow recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RunsOn and Actionsflow, you can also consider the following products

BuildJet for GitHub Actions - We provide users with managed high-performance runners for Github Actions.

ifttt - IFTTT puts the internet to work for you. Create simple connections between the products you use every day.

Cirun.io - GitHub Actions on your Cloud!

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft

n8n.io - Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks across different services.