Software Alternatives & Reviews

BuildJet for GitHub Actions VS RunsOn

Compare BuildJet for GitHub Actions VS RunsOn and see what are their differences

BuildJet for GitHub Actions logo BuildJet for GitHub Actions

We provide users with managed high-performance runners for Github Actions.

RunsOn logo RunsOn

Access the fastest and cheapest self-hosted runners on the market with a one-line change. Easily installable in your own AWS account. x64 and arm64 architectures supported.
  • BuildJet for GitHub Actions Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-04
  • RunsOn 10x cheaper GitHub Action runners
    10x cheaper GitHub Action runners //
    2024-01-23
  • RunsOn Cheaper AND faster than BuildJet / Warpbuild / GitHub
    Cheaper AND faster than BuildJet / Warpbuild / GitHub //
    2024-01-23

Cheap runners are just one part of the equation: nobody likes slow runs, even if it's cheap.

RunsOn gives you access to some of the fastest machines on the market, thanks to AWS extensive hardware selection.

Which makes RunsOn the fastest provider of self-hosted, fully ephemeral runners on the market.

We automatically build and publish copies of the official runner images at most 24h after their official release, so that you can be certain that your workflows will always work on either GitHub runners, or your own RunsOn runners.

BuildJet for GitHub Actions

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

RunsOn

$ Details
freemium €300.0 / Annually
Platforms
AWS GitHub
Release Date
2024 January

BuildJet for GitHub Actions features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

RunsOn features and specs

  • Ephemeral self-hosted runners: Yes
  • Autoscaling: Yes
  • Pricing: 10x cheaper than competition

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BuildJet for GitHub Actions and RunsOn)
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
55 55%
45% 45
CI/CD
0 0%
100% 100
Tech
100 100%
0% 0

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing BuildJet for GitHub Actions and RunsOn.

What makes your product unique?

RunsOn's answer:

10x cheaper than GitHub official runners. Runs in your own AWS account. More secure than sharing your secrets with other third-party tools like BuildJet or Warpbuild.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

RunsOn's answer:

Cheap, fast, on-premise alternative to maintaining self-hosted runners.

How would you describe your primary audience?

RunsOn's answer:

CTO / Senior developers

What's the story behind your product?

RunsOn's answer:

Built a similar product for one of my clients, reduced CI build cost by 10 times, and improve build speed from 1h to 20min.

User comments

Share your experience with using BuildJet for GitHub Actions and RunsOn. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BuildJet for GitHub Actions should be more popular than RunsOn. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BuildJet for GitHub Actions mentions (5)

  • Experiment: The costs of slow build times
    Disclaimer: Co-founder of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions While more cores can certainly help with certain types of projects, such as those that can be easily parallelized, this is not always the case. For example, web app projects won't benefit as much from additional cores. Another important factor to consider is the single-core performance of each vCPU. Many server-class CPUs, such as those used by... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Blazing fast CI with MicroVMs
    Congratulations on the launch. It looks pretty much like a self-hosted version of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • CircleCI Announces Support for Gitlab
    I'm a bit biased as one of the founders of BuildJet, but we solve this exact issue. BuildJet for GitHub Actions, plugs elegantly into GitHub Actions. With 1-line change in your config, you get 2x speed for half of GitHub's price. Check it out @ https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • We use GitHub Actions to build GitHub
    With BuildJet for GitHub Actions, you can get up to 64 vCPU as a GitHub Actions runner. We plug right into your existing setup and have a significantly higher per core performance compared to the native runner. Check us out here: https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • GitHub Actions by Example
    Incoming shameless plug; if you don’t have to handle the hosting runners, but still to reap the benefits of having proper hardware (close to the metal). Check out BuildJet for GitHub actions[1] - 2x the speed for half the price. Easy to install and easy to revert. [1] https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

RunsOn mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BuildJet for GitHub Actions and RunsOn, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Actions - Automate your workflow from idea to production

Cirun.io - GitHub Actions on your Cloud!

Actionsflow - Free Zapier alternative based on Github Actions

Social Post - A simple way to send messages from GitHub Actions

Buddy - The simplest CI/CD tool ever made, acclaimed by top developers worldwide. It uses delivery pipelines to build, test and deploy software. Pipelines are created with over 100 ready-to-use actions, that can be arranged in any way.

CloudBleedCheck - Check if a domain name is affected by CloudBleed bug