Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Ruby on Rails VS Shoelace.css

Compare Ruby on Rails VS Shoelace.css and see what are their differences

Kimp
Kimp is an unlimited design company, specializing in graphic design (including print and digital designs, custom illustrations, landing page designs and email designs) and video design. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Ruby on Rails logo Ruby on Rails

Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Shoelace.css logo Shoelace.css

A back to the basics CSS starter kit.
  • Ruby on Rails Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

We recommend LibHunt Ruby for discovery and comparisons of trending Ruby projects. Also, to find more open-source ruby alternatives, you can check out libhunt.com/r/rails

  • Shoelace.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-03

Ruby on Rails features and specs

  • Rapid Development
    Ruby on Rails uses conventions over configurations which allows developers to build applications quickly. It comes with a wealth of built-in tools and libraries that streamline the development process.
  • Community Support
    Rails has a vibrant and active community. This means a lot of third-party libraries (gems) are available, and you can easily find help and resources.
  • Convention over Configuration
    Rails emphasizes convention over configuration, which reduces the number of decisions developers need to make. This can increase productivity and consistency across projects.
  • Built-in Testing
    Rails comes with a strong built-in testing framework, making it easier to test your application and ensure that it works as expected.
  • Scalability Options
    Although it has a reputation for not being the most scalable framework, Rails can be made scalable with good architecture and the right tools.
  • RESTful Design
    Rails promotes RESTful application design, which means that it aligns well with best practices in web development and makes it easier to build APIs.

Possible disadvantages of Ruby on Rails

  • Performance
    Ruby on Rails can be slower than some other frameworks, particularly for applications that require a lot of computation or have high traffic.
  • Learning Curve
    While Rails makes many things easier with its conventions, this can create a steep learning curve for newcomers who need to understand the 'Rails way' of doing things.
  • Scalability Concerns
    Due to its monolithic nature, scaling Rails can be challenging, requiring significant architectural changes and optimizations.
  • Lesser Flexibility
    The conventions that make Rails easy to use can also be limiting. When you need to do something outside the typical Rails flow, it may be harder to implement.
  • Runtime Speed
    Ruby, the language that Rails is built on, is generally slower in terms of execution speed compared to other languages like Java or C++.
  • Memory Consumption
    Rails applications can consume a lot of memory, which can be a concern for large-scale applications or those with limited resources.

Shoelace.css features and specs

  • Customizable
    Shoelace.css is built using modern Web Components, allowing for easy customization and theming with CSS Variables, ensuring that developers can tailor components to their specific needs.
  • Compatibility
    Shoelace.css is designed to be framework-agnostic and works seamlessly with various JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, providing flexibility in integration.
  • Responsive Design
    The library provides components that are inherently responsive, which helps in building applications that look good on both desktop and mobile devices without additional effort.
  • Accessibility
    Components in Shoelace.css are designed with accessibility in mind, ensuring that applications are usable by people with disabilities and compliant with accessibility standards.
  • Modern Standards
    Being based on Web Components, Shoelace.css makes use of modern web standards, which promotes future-proofing and compatibility with upcoming web technologies.

Possible disadvantages of Shoelace.css

  • Size
    As a component library, Shoelace.css might introduce additional size to your project, which can be a concern for applications where performance and load times are critical.
  • Browser Support
    Since it uses Web Components, Shoelace.css may require polyfills for older browsers that do not fully support these technologies, potentially increasing the complexity of deployments.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with Web Components or the concept of using framework-agnostic components might need some time to understand and effectively use Shoelace.css.
  • Community and Support
    Compared to more established component libraries, Shoelace.css might have a smaller community and fewer third-party resources, which could make finding support and solutions to issues more challenging.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While highly customizable, Shoelace.css might lack some of the advanced, built-in functionalities found in larger, more comprehensive UI frameworks.

Ruby on Rails videos

+ Add

Ruby On Rails Biggest Waste Of Time In 2020 | Ruby on Rails Dead

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Ruby on Rails Tutorial | Build a Book Review App - Part 1

Shoelace.css videos

No Shoelace.css videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ruby on Rails and Shoelace.css)

Ruby on Rails

Shoelace.css

Developer Tools
94 94%
Developer Tools
6% 6
Web Frameworks
100 100%
Web Frameworks
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
Design Tools
100% 100
Python Web Framework
100 100%
Python Web Framework
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Ruby on Rails and Shoelace.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Ruby on Rails and Shoelace.css

Ruby on Rails Reviews

  1. Stan
    · Founder at SaaSHub ·
    The most productive web framework

    Yes, there are other more trending frameworks; however, nothing reaches the productivity of Rails. It's simply unbeatable if you have a small team.

    For example both SaaSHub and LibHunt were built on Rails.

    🏁 Competitors: Django, Laravel
Top 9 best Frameworks for web development
The best frameworks for web development include React, Angular, Vue.js, Django, Spring, Laravel, Ruby on Rails, Flask and Express.js. Each of these frameworks has its own advantages and distinctive features, so it is important to choose the framework that best suits the needs of your project.
Source: www.kiwop.com
Top 5 Laravel Alternatives
In terms of documentation, guidelines, and libraries, Ruby on Rails is the superior framework for smaller applications. Since it entered the online scene before Laravel, its community is larger and more well-liked among programmers. When compared to other Laravel alternatives, Ruby’s code is much simpler to understand and write.
Source: www.etatvasoft.com
Top 10 Phoenix Framework Alternatives
While modern frameworks try to minimize the tradeoffs to a limited extent, none of them has come closer to the implementation of the Phoenix Framework, which offers Ruby on Rails levels of productivity while being one of the fastest frameworks available in the market.
Source: blog.back4app.com
10 Ruby on Rails Alternatives For Web Development in 2022
Once a prolific web development technology, in 2021, both Ruby and Ruby on Rails are considered dying technologies. The data speaks for itself. In October 2021, Ruby lost 3 ranks in the Tiobe Index compared to October 2020 and became the 16th most searched programming language. The same decline in Ruby on Rails popularity is demonstrated by Google Trends. The language...
Source: www.ideamotive.co
Get Over Ruby on Rails — 3 Alternative Web Frameworks Worth Checking Out
Disclaimer: I started working on this article before the big controversy about Basecamp happened. I don’t want to make any point about this in the article. Regardless of what DHH and others are saying on different topics, Ruby on Rails is still a great piece of software and will continue to be. But there are some great alternatives as well that I would like to highlight.
Source: betterprogramming.pub

Shoelace.css Reviews

We have no reviews of Shoelace.css yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ruby on Rails should be more popular than Shoelace.css. It has been mentiond 142 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ruby on Rails mentions (142)

  • Unlocking Opportunities: How to Thrive as a Ruby Engineer in Today's Tech Landscape
    Ruby on Rails open source projects. Contribute and learn at the same time. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
  • Open Source: A Goldmine for Indie Hackers
    Speed of Development: Frameworks such as Django or Rails accelerate the development process. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
  • Indie Hacking with Open Source Tools: Innovating on a Budget
    This ecosystem is fueled by repositories hosting powerful languages, functions, and versatile tools—from backend frameworks like Django and Ruby on Rails to containerization with Docker and distributed version control via Git. Moreover, indie hackers can also utilize open source design tools (e.g. GIMP, Inkscape) and analytics platforms such as Matomo. - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago
  • Charybdis ORM: Building High-Performance Distributed Rust Backends with ScyllaDB
    Ruby on Rails (RoR) is one of the most renowned web frameworks. When combined with SQL databases, RoR transforms into a powerhouse for developing back-end (or even full-stack) applications. It resolves numerous issues out of the box, sometimes without developers even realizing it. For example, with the right callbacks, complex business logic for a single API action is automatically wrapped within a transaction,... - Source: dev.to / 24 days ago
  • Ask HN: What's the ideal stack for a solo dev in 2025
    As it's just you I'd stick with Ruby on Rails 8[1] as you already know it and I think it could realistically easily achieve what you're proposing. There's lots of libraries to for calling out external AI services. e.g. Something like FastMCP[2] From the sound of it that's all you need. I'd use Hotwire[3] for the frontend and Hotwire Native if you want to rollout an app version quickly. I'd back it with... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
View more

Shoelace.css mentions (25)

  • Show HN: Cs16.css – CSS library based on CS 1.6 UI
    Dashboards, tabs, trees, ... Usually require at least some JavaScript to work properly. For some components, you may be able to use hacks around that. But I would generally not recommend that outside of experimentation. So a pure CSS framework is not going to work. It seems that you are not using a frontend framework like Vue.js. So I would recommend a library using web components for the interactivity. One good... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • React v19 has been released
    Can webcomponents be trivially used with HTMX? Like for example: https://shoelace.style/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Do You Need to SSR Your Web Components?
    I created a simple example with a bunch of Shoelace components where they are being lazy-loaded from a CDN. I loaded the components this way to show worst-case-scenario loading performance. As you can see, it still loads quite quickly. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • You Should Be Shipping a Manifest with Your Web Components
    A recent example of this was when I was helping a team get up and running with Shoelace in a Next.js application. Shoelace provides react wrappers, but they were throwing an error when Next.js tried to server-side render them. Fortunately, Shoelace ships their CEM, so I was able to use it to generate new wrappers that were SSR-safe. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Web Components Are Okay
    I've yet to see this go wrong in practice. The kinds of components that are worth publishing as web components are often large, non-trivial components. Eg media libraries, emoji pickers (like the one made by this article's author), chatbox interfaces, and so on. They are the kinds of things you only have a limited number of on your page. If a component is small and focused in scope, it's likely either written in... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ruby on Rails and Shoelace.css, you can also consider the following products

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

DaisyUI - Free UI components plugin for Tailwind CSS

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

CSSGradient.io - As a free css gradient generator tool, this website lets you create a colorful gradient background for your website, blog, or social media profile.

Loading...