Google App Engine might be a bit more popular than ROOK. We know about 26 links to it since March 2021 and only 23 links to ROOK. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I have some experience with Ceph, both for work, and with homelab-y stuff. First, bear in mind that Ceph is a distributed storage system - so the idea is that you will have multiple nodes. For learning, you can definitely virtualise it all on a single box - but you'll have a better time with discrete physical machines. Also, Ceph does prefer physical access to disks (similar to ZFS). And you do need decent... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Another option is to leverage a Kubernetes-native distributed storage solution such as Rook Ceph as the storage backend for stateful components running on Kubernetes. This has the benefit of simplifying application configuration while addressing business requirements for data backup and recovery such as the ability to take volume snapshots at a regular interval and perform application-level data recovery in case... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
This is beyond your question but might help someone else: I switch from docker-compose to kubernetes for my home lab a while ago. The storage solution I've settled on is Rook. It was a bit of up-front work learning how to get it up but now that it's done my storage is automatically managed by Ceph. I can swap out drives and Ceph basically takes care of everything itself. Source: 11 months ago
The stumbling point I am at is I want to use rook.io(Ceph) as my storage solution for the cluster. The Ceph prerequisites are one of the following:. Source: about 1 year ago
Storage: Favor any distributed storage you know to start with for Persistent Volumes: Ceph maybe via rook.io, Longhorn if you go rancher etc. Source: over 1 year ago
In 2008, Google launched AppEngine. This product predates the formal existence of Google Cloud and can be considered Google Cloud's first offering. - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
To deploy the app, we can use Google Cloud App Engine, which is specifically built for server-side rendered websites. After we create a new project in the Google Cloud Console, we have to configure the cql-trace-viewer application. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
I've read that article, but I'm thinking there are other better (and most importantly cheaper) ways of doing that, such as using App Engine (given that you have to mitigate the maximum request timeout and to make sure there are constantly exactly 1 instance running). Source: about 1 year ago
Shout out to GCP App Engine for deploying anode/Express severe. Source: about 1 year ago
If your project is a bit more complicated using next.js or react.js or angular.js, you may find some free Platfrom-as-a-Service%20is%20a%20complete%20cloud%20environment,middleware%2C%20tools%2C%20and%20more.). I have seen some of my peers using free PaaS like Heroku, Vercel and I have no experience in using PaaS but I will recommend you to use PaaS from either of the three 1. Google Cloud's Google App Engine 2.... Source: about 1 year ago
Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.
Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Platform is a comprehensive PaaS solution that paves the way for the developers to test, build, and mitigate the issues in the cloud application before the final deployment.
Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...
Dokku - Docker powered mini-Heroku in around 100 lines of Bash
Openstack Swift - Application and Data, Data Stores, and Cloud Storage
Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.