Software Alternatives & Reviews

rkt VS OpenEBS

Compare rkt VS OpenEBS and see what are their differences

rkt logo rkt

App Container runtime

OpenEBS logo OpenEBS

Container-based distributed storage
  • rkt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08
  • OpenEBS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-13

rkt videos

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

More videos:

  • Review - 2018 Niner RKT 9 RDO - First Look and Build Kit Overview
  • Review - Best Stock Picks Today | RKT Stock 9-2-20

OpenEBS videos

OpenEBS 101: Hyperconverged Kubernetes Native Storage - Kiran Mova & Vishnu Itta, MayaData

More videos:

  • Review - Kubernetes Storage Is More Than CSI – Do It Right The OpenEBS Way

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rkt and OpenEBS)
Cloud Computing
62 62%
38% 38
Cloud Storage
57 57%
43% 43
Storage
67 67%
33% 33
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using rkt and OpenEBS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare rkt and OpenEBS

rkt Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:

OpenEBS Reviews

We have no reviews of OpenEBS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OpenEBS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

rkt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of rkt yet. Tracking of rkt recommendations started around Mar 2021.

OpenEBS mentions (8)

  • OpenEBS on MicroK8S on Hetzner
    Last few months I experimented more and more with all OpenEBS solutions that fit small Kubernetes cluster, using MicroK8S and Hetzner Cloud for a real experience. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Network Storage on On-Prem Barebones Machine
    I would investigate https://openebs.io/ https://portworx.com/ https://longhorn.io/ if you are forced to you can mount ISCSI on the kublet and feed it to one of those solutions. Keep in mind most of the big guys buy some sort of managed solution that you can point a CSI like trident https://netapp-trident.readthedocs.io. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What are some fun projects to run on a home K8s cluster?
    What are some cool projects to self hosted on a home Raspberry Pi (64 bit) Kubernetes cluster (Helm charts). Arm64 support is a must. A lot of projects only build amd64 Docker containers which don't run on my cluster. I currently run:
       - obenebs (provides abstraction for using local k8s worker disks as PVC mounts when running on-prem) -- https://openebs.io/.
    - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • My self-hosting infrastructure, fully automated
    What do you use to provision Kubernetes persistent volumes on bare metal? I’m looking at open-ebs (https://openebs.io/). Also, when you bump the image tag in a git commit for a given helm chart, how does that get deployed? Is it automatic, or do you manually run helm upgrade commands? - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Building a "complete" cluster locally
    Ideas from my kubernetes experience: * Cert-Manager is very popular and almost a must-have if you terminate SSL inside the cluster * Backups using velero * A dashboard/UI is actually very helpful to quickly browse resources, client tools like k9s are fine too * Secret: Management: Bitnami Sealed Secrets is the second big project in that space * I would add Loki to aggregate Logs * Never heard of ory. Usually I see... Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rkt and OpenEBS, you can also consider the following products

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability

REX-Ray - Runtime

Apache ServiceMix - Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.