Table of contents
OpenEBS
Container-based distributed storage.
As OpenEBS is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
Container-Native
OpenEBS is built specifically for containerized environments, making it a great fit for Kubernetes. Its architecture allows it to integrate well, leveraging the distributed nature of Kubernetes.
Polyglot Storage
Allows users to choose different storage engines based on their needs. Users can select engines like Jiva, cStor, or Mayastor depending on performance and data protection requirements.
Data Locality
OpenEBS provides the feature of data locality, ensuring volumes are placed on the same node as the application consuming them, reducing latency, and improving performance.
Flexibility and Scalability
Designed to be easily deployed and managed in diverse cloud environments, allowing users to scale storage as their Kubernetes environment grows.
Active Community
Supported by a vibrant community and commercial backing from companies like MayaData, contributing to its continuous improvement and extensive documentation resources.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if OpenEBS is good.
Check the traffic stats of OpenEBS on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of OpenEBS on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of OpenEBS's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of OpenEBS on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about OpenEBS on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Last few months I experimented more and more with all OpenEBS solutions that fit small Kubernetes cluster, using MicroK8S and Hetzner Cloud for a real experience. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
I would investigate https://openebs.io/ https://portworx.com/ https://longhorn.io/ if you are forced to you can mount ISCSI on the kublet and feed it to one of those solutions. Keep in mind most of the big guys buy some sort of managed solution that you can point a CSI like trident https://netapp-trident.readthedocs.io. Source: almost 3 years ago
What are some cool projects to self hosted on a home Raspberry Pi (64 bit) Kubernetes cluster (Helm charts). Arm64 support is a must. A lot of projects only build amd64 Docker containers which don't run on my cluster. I currently run:- Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago- obenebs (provides abstraction for using local k8s worker disks as PVC mounts when running on-prem) -- https://openebs.io/.
What do you use to provision Kubernetes persistent volumes on bare metal? I’m looking at open-ebs (https://openebs.io/). Also, when you bump the image tag in a git commit for a given helm chart, how does that get deployed? Is it automatic, or do you manually run helm upgrade commands? - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Ideas from my kubernetes experience: * Cert-Manager is very popular and almost a must-have if you terminate SSL inside the cluster * Backups using velero * A dashboard/UI is actually very helpful to quickly browse resources, client tools like k9s are fine too * Secret: Management: Bitnami Sealed Secrets is the second big project in that space * I would add Loki to aggregate Logs * Never heard of ory. Usually I see... Source: over 3 years ago
I'm a bit biased but Rook[0] or OpenEBS[1] are the best solutions that scale from hobbyist to enterprise IMO. A few reasons: - Rook is "just" managed Ceph[2], and Ceph is good enough for CERN[3]. But it does need raw disks (nothing saying these can't be loopback drives but there is a performance cost) - OpenEBS has a lot of choices (Jiva is the simplest and is Longhorn[4] underneath, cStor is based... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
It's a little complicated at first but there's also OpenEBS and Longhorn. Longhorn is probably the most easiest to get going with, but I chose rook-ceph because it's very stable. Source: almost 4 years ago
- SMB CSI: https://github.com/kubernetes-csi/csi-driver-smb - OpenEBS if you got the hardware for it: https://openebs.io/. Source: about 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing OpenEBS to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is OpenEBS good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss OpenEBS here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
