Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

rkt VS IPFS

Compare rkt VS IPFS and see what are their differences

rkt logo rkt

App Container runtime

IPFS logo IPFS

IPFS is the permanent web. A new peer-to-peer hypermedia protocol.
  • rkt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08
  • IPFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-06-25

rkt features and specs

  • Compatibility
    rkt supports the App Container (appc) spec and can also run Docker container images, providing flexibility and compatibility with various container formats.
  • Security
    rkt is designed with security in mind, offering features like process isolation through Linux namespaces, user namespaces, and SELinux/AppArmor integration.
  • Isolation
    rkt runs applications in their own stage1 environments, ensuring strong isolation between containers and better resource management.
  • Modularity
    rkt is built with a modular architecture, allowing users to swap out the stage1 implementation to better fit their needs.
  • Lightweight
    rkt avoids running a central daemon, thus using fewer system resources and simplifying debugging and monitoring.

Possible disadvantages of rkt

  • Maturity
    rkt is not as mature as Docker, meaning it may lack some features and integrations that have been developed for Docker.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    rkt has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Docker, which may limit the availability of third-party tools and support.
  • Adoption
    rkt has lower adoption rates, leading to fewer tutorials, guides, and community-driven content, which can make the learning curve steeper.
  • Development Activity
    rkt's development and maintenance activity is not as high as Docker's, which could impact long-term viability and feature development.
  • Enterprise Support
    Enterprise-grade support and services for rkt may not be as widely available or comprehensive as those for Docker.

IPFS features and specs

  • Decentralization
    IPFS operates on a peer-to-peer network, reducing dependency on central servers and improving resilience and fault tolerance.
  • Content Addressing
    Resources in IPFS are accessed through content hashes, ensuring data integrity and authenticity by directly referencing content, not its location.
  • Improved Load Distribution
    By distributing data across multiple nodes, IPFS can balance load, which can improve availability and access speed.
  • Offline Access
    Data stored in IPFS can be accessed offline if the content is already cached locally, enabling persistent availability.
  • Resistance to Censorship
    Decentralization makes it harder to censor content since there is no single point of failure that can be targeted.
  • Reduced Bandwidth Usage
    IPFS can save bandwidth by referencing previously downloaded content from local networks or peers rather than fetching it from remote servers.
  • Historical Versioning
    IPFS can keep track of historical versions of content, allowing for content versioning and retrieval of past data states.

Possible disadvantages of IPFS

  • Complexity
    Implementing and managing an IPFS network can be complex, requiring understanding of peer-to-peer networking and content addressing.
  • Initial Content Distribution
    Uploading content to IPFS and ensuring it gets distributed across the network can require significant initial effort and time.
  • Storage Redundancy
    Data is stored redundantly across multiple nodes, which can lead to increased storage requirements compared to traditional centralized storage.
  • Persistence
    Unless explicitly pinned, content might not persist indefinitely on IPFS, potentially leading to loss of data that's not sufficiently replicated.
  • Scalability of Pinning Services
    To ensure data persistence and availability, pinning services might be required, which can incur additional costs and complexity as the network scales.
  • Legal and Compliance Issues
    Decentralized storage can complicate legal compliance and content moderation, as it's harder to control and regulate distributed data.
  • Performance Variability
    Access speeds can vary based on the availability and performance of peers in the network, leading to inconsistent user experiences.
  • Energy Consumption
    Maintaining a large, distributed network of nodes can lead to higher energy consumption compared to centralized infrastructure.

Analysis of rkt

Overall verdict

  • Overall, RKT is a strong choice for organizations using Red Hat's cloud solutions, particularly those focusing on security, compliance, and efficient container management.

Why this product is good

  • RKT (Red Hat Quay and OpenShift Container Registry) is considered good due to its robust features in container management, such as secure image distribution, vulnerability scanning, and role-based access controls. It's part of the Red Hat ecosystem, offering seamless integration with other Red Hat products and services, making it a reliable choice for enterprises seeking secure and scalable container solutions.

Recommended for

  • Companies already using Red Hat platforms
  • Organizations requiring comprehensive security and compliance features
  • Development teams looking for integrated tools for container lifecycle management
  • Enterprises focusing on scalability and robust container infrastructure

Analysis of IPFS

Overall verdict

  • IPFS is highly regarded as a promising technology for those who value decentralization and privacy. It provides a more robust alternative to traditional HTTP by enabling content addressing, incentivizing storage, and reducing reliance on singular points of failure. However, it might still have limitations in terms of user-friendliness and wide-scale adoption.

Why this product is good

  • IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) is a peer-to-peer distributed file system that aims to connect all computing devices with the same system of files. It's designed to make the web faster, safer, and more open by decentralizing the way files are stored and accessed. This eliminates the need for centralized servers, making file transfer and storage more resilient and efficient.

Recommended for

  • Developers interested in decentralized applications
  • Projects focusing on data integrity and censorship resistance
  • Users seeking alternatives to traditional web hosting solutions
  • Open-source enthusiasts and privacy advocates

rkt videos

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

More videos:

  • Review - 2018 Niner RKT 9 RDO - First Look and Build Kit Overview
  • Review - Best Stock Picks Today | RKT Stock 9-2-20

IPFS videos

Why IPFS? - Juan Benet

More videos:

  • Review - Ether-1 Project Review - Decentralized Web Hosting - IPFS Protocol - DAPPS
  • Review - Best Decentralised Storage Systems : ARWEAVE vs IPFS FILECOIN
  • Review - Why IPFS Is SO Important! (Simple Explanation)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rkt and IPFS)
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
16 16%
84% 84
File Sharing
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using rkt and IPFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare rkt and IPFS

rkt Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
In 2018, 12 percent of production containers were rkt (pronounced “Rocket”). Rkt supports two types of images: Docker and appc. A selling point of rkt is its pod-based process that works out of the box with Kubernetes (also referred to as “rktnetes”). In Kubernetes, an rkt container runtime can easily be specified:

IPFS Reviews

We have no reviews of IPFS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, IPFS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 290 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

rkt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of rkt yet. Tracking of rkt recommendations started around Mar 2021.

IPFS mentions (290)

  • zkJSON Litepaper v1.0
    WeaveChain will be a CosmosSDK based DePIN blockchain and a marketplace to match database developers / dapps with rollup operators. It's basically a Filecoin for database. zkDB/WeaveDB is to WeaveChain as IPFS is to Filecoin. We will introduce 2 unique components to connect with real-world data and web2. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
  • Showcase Your Achievements Securely with CertiFolio 🚀
    IPFS (optional: if you want to run your own IPFS node). - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Decentralized media Made easy
    When I click on https://synapsemedia.io/ I get redirected to a link like https://ipfs.io/ipns/synapsemedia.io (to use ipfs.io instead of my local node). Source: about 2 years ago
  • 4EVERLAND’s IPFS Pinning Service: 4EVER Pin
    You may already be aware that the Interplanetary File System or IPFS is a distributed storage network where computers from all over the world form nodes to share data. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How to host an encrypted page
    In case of you don't trust them, it gets harder. Especially if you need to have it hosted without any trace to yourself. I'd probably pay a service to store my data on ipfs. You can pay with crypto. But I'm this case there's the question, how will you be able to access it. My thought would be to have a [tails][tails] USB with the necessary software. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rkt and IPFS, you can also consider the following products

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

FileCoin - Filecoin is a data storage network and electronic currency based on Bitcoin.

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Dropbox - Online Sync and File Sharing

Apache ServiceMix - Apache ServiceMix is an open source ESB that combines the functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture and the modularity.

Google Drive - Access and sync your files anywhere