No reStructuredText videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, JSDoc should be more popular than reStructuredText. It has been mentiond 51 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Markup language: Markup language is used to write documents in a way that distinguishes them from plain text. Most SSGs utilize lightweight markup languages, such as Markdown. However, alternatives like AsciiDoc, Textile, and ReStructuredText are also used. These lightweight languages simplify content creation and are converted into HTML during the site generation process. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Uses Sphinx, reStructuredText And the sphinx-rtd-theme for writing, building And rendering the documentation. Source: 9 months ago
If we're dreaming, ReStructed Text support. Source: about 1 year ago
You can always switch to rst¹ and sphinx² to produce html/pdf came join the dark side, we have tables³ :) 1. https://docutils.sourceforge.io/rst.html. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
ReStrutucturedText is still useful to look at for inspiration here. It had the concepts of extensible metadata ("field lists"), spans ("interpreted text"), and blocks ("directives"). Including things like applying metadata to spans (using essentially Footnotes to provide field lists to interpreted text sections, like but better than Markdown's reference style for hyperlinks which almost no one uses but were much... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Thanks to JSDoc it's easy to write documentation that is coupled with your code and can be consumed by users in a variety of formats. When combined with a modern publishing flow like JSR, you can easily create comprehensive documentation for your package that not only fits within your workflow, but also integrates directly in the tools your users consume your package with. This blog post aims to cover best... - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago
Note: For simplicity, I will omit the JavaScript documentation, but for a production grade code you may want to add the documentation (see jsdoc.app website for more). - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago
You may like JSDoc[1] if you just want some type-safety from the IDE without the compilation overhead. It’s done wonders when I’ve had to wrangle poorly commented legacy JavaScript codebases where most of the overhead is tracing what type the input parameters are. Personally, I’m impartial to TypeScript or JSDoc at this point. But I’d rather have either over plain JavaScript. [1] https://jsdoc.app/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
I wholeheartedly agree. At most, I introduce JSDoc[1] to newer developers as standardising how parameters and whatnot are commented at least gets you better documentation and _some_ safety without adding any TS knowledge overhead. [1] https://jsdoc.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
The best way to do this, of course, is with JSDoc. But something I always found awkward about jsdoc is defining the object types in the same file. So, after a lot of reading, I found a way to combine JSDoc with declaration type files from Typescript. Let me give you an example:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Asciidoctor - In the spirit of free software, everyone is encouraged to help improve this project.
Doxygen - Generate documentation from source code
Markdown by DaringFireball - Text-to-HTML conversion tool/syntax for web writers, by John Gruber
Swagger UI - Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation from a Swag
pandoc - Pandoc is a Haskell library for converting from one markup format to another, and a command-line...
JSOLint - Format, verify, and lint JSON effortlessly with our powerful Validator Tool. Generate pretty JSON and validate online for free. Simplify your JSON tasks