Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

reStructuredText VS Asciidoctor

Compare reStructuredText VS Asciidoctor and see what are their differences

reStructuredText logo reStructuredText

Invented for Python documentation.

Asciidoctor logo Asciidoctor

In the spirit of free software, everyone is encouraged to help improve this project.
  • reStructuredText Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-26
  • Asciidoctor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20

reStructuredText features and specs

  • Readability
    reStructuredText offers a clean, readable syntax that resembles plain text, making it easy for humans to read and write without requiring special software.
  • Extensibility
    It permits extensions and custom directives, allowing users to create new functionalities and adaptations specific to their needs.
  • Integration
    It is the default markup language for Python documentation and is naturally supported by Sphinx, which makes it suitable for generating detailed and attractive documentation.
  • Semantic Richness
    reStructuredText supports comprehensive semantic markup structures, enabling detailed annotations and proper structuring of documents.

Possible disadvantages of reStructuredText

  • Complexity
    Learning all of the features of reStructuredText can be complex for beginners due to its wide range of functionalities and strict syntax rules.
  • Limited Adoption
    Compared to Markdown, reStructuredText has a smaller user base and community support, which can limit resources and examples available for new users.
  • Tool Support
    While it is well-supported in Python environments, outside this ecosystem, there are fewer tools and editors that provide full support and previews for reStructuredText.
  • Less Forgiving
    The syntax is more rigid and less forgiving of errors compared to some alternatives like Markdown, which means small mistakes can lead to rendering issues.

Asciidoctor features and specs

  • Human-Readable Syntax
    Asciidoctor uses the AsciiDoc syntax, which is designed to be easy to read and write by humans. This makes it accessible for both technical and non-technical users, easing the learning curve.
  • Output Formats
    It supports a wide range of output formats including HTML, PDF, DocBook, EPUB, and more, providing flexibility in how documents are presented and shared.
  • Customizable and Extensible
    Asciidoctor is highly customizable and can be extended with custom extensions and plugins. This allows users to tailor the tool to their specific documentation needs and workflows.
  • Open Source
    Asciidoctor is an open-source project, fostering a community-driven development environment. This ensures transparency and continuous improvements driven by a diverse set of contributors.
  • Integration with Tooling
    It integrates well with various build tools and editors such as Maven, Gradle, and AsciiDoc plugins for IDEs, aiding in seamless documentation processes and version control.

Possible disadvantages of Asciidoctor

  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic documentation is easy to produce, mastering advanced features and custom extensions may require a deeper understanding of the system, which can be challenging for new users.
  • Limited Native PDF Support
    Asciidoctor's native support for generating PDFs is less robust compared to its HTML output, often requiring additional tools like Asciidoctor PDF or DocBook for high-quality results.
  • Dependency Management
    External dependencies are sometimes needed for specific outputs or extensions (like PDF generation), which might complicate project setups and increase build times.
  • Less Widespread Adoption
    Compared to markdown, Asciidoctor has less widespread adoption, which might result in fewer community resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations available for support.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Integration with certain tools and workflows can present compatibility issues, especially when dealing with continuously updated software ecosystems.

reStructuredText videos

No reStructuredText videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Asciidoctor videos

Code your documentation with AsciiDoctor - open source is for everyone

More videos:

  • Review - [VDM19] Asciidoctor: because writing docs does not have to suck by Adres Almiray
  • Review - 10 Useful Asciidoctor Tips

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to reStructuredText and Asciidoctor)
Documentation
32 32%
68% 68
Documentation As A Service & Tools
Knowledge Base
35 35%
65% 65
Text
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using reStructuredText and Asciidoctor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare reStructuredText and Asciidoctor

reStructuredText Reviews

We have no reviews of reStructuredText yet.
Be the first one to post

Asciidoctor Reviews

  1. Elisa
    · Technical Writer at Self ·
    Professional output from open source

    If you are looking for an open documentation solution ny which you can implement single sourcing while integrating with a complex build process then this is a great solution.

    👍 Pros:    Easy integration|Easy to use

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Asciidoctor should be more popular than reStructuredText. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

reStructuredText mentions (10)

View more

Asciidoctor mentions (24)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing reStructuredText and Asciidoctor, you can also consider the following products

pandoc - Pandoc is a Haskell library for converting from one markup format to another, and a command-line...

Markdown by DaringFireball - Text-to-HTML conversion tool/syntax for web writers, by John Gruber

mdbook - Gitbook alternative in Rust

Antora - A static site generator for creating documentation sites from AsciiDoc content aggregated from...

GitBook - Modern Publishing, Simply taking your books from ideas to finished, polished books.

MkDocs - Project documentation with Markdown.