Antora VS Asciidoctor

Antora Reviews

Asciidoctor Reviews

1. Elisa    

   Technical Writer at Self | about 2 years ago
   Professional output from open source

   If you are looking for an open documentation solution ny which you can implement single sourcing while integrating with a complex build process then this is a great solution.

   👍 Pros:    Easy integration|Easy to use

Antora mentions (21)

• I don't always use LaTeX, but when I do, I compile to HTML (2013)

  You have also AsciiDoctor ( https://asciidoctor.org/ ) which is alive and well. I am using it for technical CS documentation internally, but only for single page documents. I did not try to deploy their whole multi-document setup called Antora ( https://antora.org/ ). - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Quarkus : Greener, Better, Faster, Stronger

  Well scaffolding an extension also generates a docs module wich leverages Antora, and with a minimal effort, we can produce a nice and clean documentation. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• Docs as Code at Linode (2020)

  AsciiDoc has a bit more features compared to Markdown which allows for a richer presentation of the docs. Biggest difference is that Linode has the docs in a separate repository. Not sure if it is a limitation of their toolchain or a deliberate decision. Antora allows you to have the project documentation in the actual project repositories. It then pulls the docs from all the different repos together to build the... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Ideas on improving internal technical documentation`

  I've been pushing for Antora everywhere I go. It allows you to keep text-based (AsciiDoc, similar to markdown but an actual standard) documentation with your repositories and from that build a central documentation portal site. Source: about 1 year ago

• I wish Asciidoc was more popular

  We use AsciiDoc for our technical documentation, and it's great. Last year we moved from AsciiDoctor to Antora [1] and I can't recommend it enough. [1] https://antora.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Asciidoctor mentions (23)

• I don't always use LaTeX, but when I do, I compile to HTML (2013)

  You have also AsciiDoctor ( https://asciidoctor.org/ ) which is alive and well. I am using it for technical CS documentation internally, but only for single page documents. I did not try to deploy their whole multi-document setup called Antora ( https://antora.org/ ). - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Documentation generators and custom syntax highlighting

  I use Asciidoctor, highlightjs, a custom highlight.js language definition and that bash script:. Source: 12 months ago

• I wish Asciidoc was more popular

  In fact, also this claim is wrong, because there are three :D 1. https://asciidoctor.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Markdown, Asciidoc, or reStructuredText - a tale of docs-as-code

  Asciidoctor is a Ruby-based text processor for parsing AsciiDoc into a document model and converting it to HTML5, PDF, EPUB3, and other formats. Built-in converters for HTML5, DocBook5, and man pages are available in Asciidoctor. Asciidoctor has an out-of-the-box default stylesheet and built-in integrations for MathJax (display beautiful math in your browser), highlight.js, Rouge, and Pygments (syntax... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Docs as code vs a tool that can work with .md and xml?

  If you're looking at AsciiDoc, you'll want to look at Asciidoctor: https://asciidoctor.org/. Source: over 1 year ago