Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Redux.js VS Chicken

Compare Redux.js VS Chicken and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Redux.js logo Redux.js

Predictable state container for JavaScript apps

Chicken logo Chicken

A portable and efficient cross-platform Scheme implementation that compiles to C.
  • Redux.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-17
  • Chicken Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18

Redux.js features and specs

  • Predictable State Management
    Redux provides a single source of truth for the state of your application, which makes it easier to manage and debug. The state changes in a predictable way, which helps in maintaining consistency across the application.
  • Ecosystem and Community
    Redux has a large community and a rich ecosystem of middleware, development tools, and libraries. This support can accelerate development and troubleshooting.
  • Time-Travel Debugging
    With tools like Redux DevTools, developers can leverage features such as action logging, hot-reloading, and time-travel debugging, helping to understand and trace state changes effectively.
  • Middleware Support
    Redux supports middleware that lets you intercept actions and perform side effects like API calls, logging, or modifying actions before they reach reducers. This makes handling asynchronous operations more manageable.
  • Compatibility with React
    Although Redux can be used with any front-end library or framework, it pairs particularly well with React. Libraries like React-Redux offer seamless integration, making it easier to bind React components to the Redux store.

Possible disadvantages of Redux.js

  • Boilerplate Code
    Redux often requires a significant amount of boilerplate code, including actions, reducers, and store configuration. This may result in more verbose code, especially for simple applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Understanding the principles of Redux, such as actions, reducers, and the store, along with concepts like immutability and pure functions, can be challenging for beginners.
  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its strict immutability principles and the frequent creation of new state objects, Redux can introduce performance overhead, especially in large applications with complex state management needs.
  • Rigid Structure
    While the rigid structure of Redux can enforce good practices, it can also be restrictive and inflexible for certain types of applications. Developers might find it cumbersome to work within the boilerplate constraints.
  • Not Always Necessary
    For simple or small applications, the complexity that Redux introduces can be overkill. In such cases, alternatives like the Context API in React or simpler state management solutions might be more appropriate.

Chicken features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Chicken Scheme is designed to be simple and easy to understand, making it accessible for new users and those familiar with Scheme.
  • R5RS Compatibility
    Chicken Scheme implements the R5RS standard, which ensures compatibility with other Scheme implementations and a wide range of Scheme programs.
  • Portability
    It is highly portable and runs on various platforms, making it a flexible choice for cross-platform development.
  • Extensive Libraries
    Chicken has a rich repository of user-contributed extensions (eggs), providing a vast set of libraries that extend its functionality.
  • Performance
    Chicken Scheme is designed for high performance, using an optimizing compiler that translates Scheme code into C, which is then compiled to machine code.

Possible disadvantages of Chicken

  • Limited Community
    Compared to more popular languages, Chicken Scheme has a smaller developer community, which may limit resources and support.
  • Egg Management Complexity
    Managing extensions (eggs) can be complex and sometimes introduces dependency issues that can be challenging to resolve.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic usage is straightforward, leveraging advanced features and understanding the compiler's workings can have a steep learning curve.
  • Documentation Variability
    The quality and comprehensiveness of documentation can vary, which might complicate the learning and development process for new users.
  • Niche Use Case
    Being a Scheme implementation, its niche use case might not align well with industries primarily relying on mainstream programming languages.

Redux.js videos

No Redux.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Chicken videos

+ Add

KFC Nashville Hot Extra Crispy Chicken Review

More videos:

  • Review - KFC's® Nashville Hot Chicken REVIEW!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Redux.js and Chicken)

Redux.js

Chicken

Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0
Programming Language
0 0%
Programming Language
100% 100
JS Library
100 100%
JS Library
0% 0
OOP
0 0%
OOP
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Redux.js and Chicken. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Redux.js seems to be a lot more popular than Chicken. While we know about 189 links to Redux.js, we've tracked only 6 mentions of Chicken. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Redux.js mentions (189)

  • Very Basic - Redux
    If you need more in depth information check out the documentation. https://redux.js.org/ It's actually pretty great. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
  • Architecture and Design Patterns in Front-End
    In frontend, the most probably well-known approach is Flux and its most common implementation, Redux. This is an example of unidirectional data flow. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
  • Organisation of Data Flows
    The best known example of an architecture with unidirectional data flow is Flux and, as its implementation, Redux. - Source: dev.to / 30 days ago
  • Valentine’s Day Breakup: React Dumps Create React App
    CRA makes integrating libraries like Redux and React Router easy without requiring complex Webpack and Babel configurations. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • UmiJS: the Shaolin of web frameworks
    Dva. A plugin-based state management solution (Redux + Sagas). Also quite popular in narrow communities outside of the Umi world. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

Chicken mentions (6)

  • Scheming About Clojure
    Clojure seems good enough. It is not flawless and somewhat overloaded, but far, far ahead of Javascript, Python, Go, or Rust. Of course, I would always prefer CHICKEN Scheme for any passion project. But in an environment that already runs databases written in Java, the JVM has street cred, and a large community hints at sustainability, Clojure presents itself as well balanced in novelty and stability. All in all,... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Veryl: A Modern Hardware Description Language
    Of course it does! What else would you call something like chicken scheme [https://call-cc.org/], ats [https://ats-lang.sourceforge.net/], or ghc [https://www.haskell.org/ghc/]? They are not "scripts", they are full-blown compilers that happen to use C as their compilation target, and then leverage C compilers to generate code for a variety of architecures. it's a very sensible way to do things. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • The Rise & Fall of LISP - Too Good For The Rest Of the World
    CHICKEN Scheme \ CHICKEN is a compiler for the Scheme programming language. It produces portable and efficient C and supports the R5RS and R7RS (work in progress) standards, and many extensions. It runs on Linux, OS X, Windows, many Unix flavours... Source: about 2 years ago
  • One Minute: Chicken Scheme
    Website: http://call-cc.org Manual: http://wiki.call-cc.org/manual/index Wiki: http://wiki.call-cc.org/ Repository: https://code.call-cc.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=chicken-core.git;a=summary Standard Libraries: http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Included%20modules Extension Repository: http://eggs.call-cc.org/5/. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Ante: A low-level functional language
    If you’re fine with tracing GC (which depends on the situation, of course), Standard ML is a perfectly boring language (that IIUC predated and inspired Caml) and MLton[1] is a very nice optimizing compiler for it. The language is awkward at times (in particular, the separate sublanguage of modules can be downright unwieldy), and the library has some of the usual blind spots such as nonexistent Unicode support... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Redux.js and Chicken, you can also consider the following products

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

Racket Lang - Racket (formerly PLT Scheme) is a modern programming language in the Lisp/Scheme family, suitable...

react-context - Context provides a way to pass data through the component tree without having to pass props down manually at every level.

Guile - Guile is the GNU Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extensions, the official extension language for the GNU operating system.

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps

Clojure - Clojure is a dynamic, general-purpose programming language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming.

Loading...