redirect.pizza VS The Factual

redirect.pizza Reviews

1. Chanaka De Silva    

   Software developer at preisboerse24 | over 2 years ago
   Super easy https redirection

   I was struggling with the HTTPS redirection with one of our old URLs and it was so hectic to manage. We didn't have any servers for this domain too. With redirect.pizza, it was so easy and I just needed to add few records to the domain and within 10 hours, it worked perfectly. I highly recommend redirect.pizza. And also their customer service is excellent too.

   👍 Pros:    Easy to setup|Simple interface|Simple but powerful

The Factual Reviews

redirect.pizza mentions (9)

• A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev

  Redirect.pizza - Easily manage redirects with HTTPS support. The free plan includes 10 sources and 100,000 hits per month. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• HTTPS to HTTPS domain forwarding

  Https://redirect.pizza dumb name but does the trick for free. Source: 11 months ago

• [BEGINNER] How do I re-route users to another link while they visit my domain page?

  Use Redirect Pizza (probably the easiest option). Source: 11 months ago

• Wildcards are not allowed problem in Freenom

  Hello. I try to use redirect.pizza but it does not work because when I try to set the name it says Wildcards are not allowed. Can somebody help? Source: about 1 year ago

• Redirect Woes

  Looks like redirect.pizza supports https redirects and is affordable, I'll use this. Source: about 1 year ago

The Factual mentions (5)

• Sam on Tucker Carlson and why left-wing media is the only legitimate news source: "The only legitimate media, for the most part, is left-wing media ... Breitbart and Fox are not journalism ... I care about them as destructive forces in our society; they're pseudo media."

  From the site, thefactual.com, MSNBC's credibility, or factual rating, ranks them in the 17th percentile. That means that MSNBC is less factual than 83% of the other news sources presented in the dataset. CNN is in the 15th percentile. Fox News sits right in the middle of these two in the 16th percentile. Source: about 1 year ago

• A rebel disrupted The View today, interrupting climate-denying guest Ted Cruz.

  According to thefactual.com, CNN received a Factual Grade of 53.3%, placing it in the 15th percentile. Fox News received a Factual Grade of 53.6%, placing it in the 16th percentile. Both are shitty, but according to this analysis, Fox News is marginally higher. MSNBC received a Factual Grade of 54.9%, placing it in the 17th percentile. You are a Dunning-Kruger ignoramus. Source: over 1 year ago

• How do I grow my blog newsletter subscriptions?

  We also have a newsletter focused on credible news at thefactual.com, and we'd be happy to swab feedback! Source: over 2 years ago

• Show HN: The Sample – newsletters curated for you with machine learning

  > Moreover investment of time on user side for newsletter delivering news increases with each newsletter vs One newsletter delivering what I want. You might be interested in this article[1] and the discussion of subscribed vs. Filtered sources. It'd be nice to have a convenient way to assign different priorities to newsletters/content sources. So for a few, you'd get every issue, and for the rest, they'd be... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

• What's behind the rise in anti-Asian hate crime? Join us on Clubhouse today!

  Hi there, yes, we're planning a follow-up discussion for this week! Follow us via email at thefactual.com, or social media @thefactualnews and we'll keep you updated on the upcoming discussion. Our previous one did well, and we tackled multiple perspectives with data. We hope you can join the next one! Source: about 3 years ago