No ReadMe videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Jekyll should be more popular than ReadMe. It has been mentiond 180 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Readme.com — Beautiful documentation made easy, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
I believe they are using https://readme.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Seems more expensive that readme.com!!! But looks really good! Source: 12 months ago
The main pros I like about readme.com - you can manage it with Code As Docs paradigm - you just sync your OpenAPI specs and markdown pages from your repository to their site. Source: 12 months ago
Readme: Readme is a popular documentation platform that can be used for API documentation. It provides a user-friendly interface for creating and publishing API documentation, and supports both OpenAPI and Swagger. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
In future, if you want to move from Jekyll to something else, you just have to worry about that `_posts` and `_assets` folder. They may have different naming convention but you can just config-managed it or change it to your choice. This is why I suggested owning that two yourself. You also may not worry about FrontMatter[3] (meta in the header) and its accompanying jazz by asking Jekyll to use the plugins... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
GitBook - Modern Publishing, Simply taking your books from ideas to finished, polished books.
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
Docusaurus - Easy to maintain open source documentation websites
WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.
Archbee.io - Archbee is a developer-focused product docs tool for your team. Build beautiful product documentation sites or internal wikis/knowledge bases to get your team and product knowledge in one place.
Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.