React Bricks VS Jekyll

React Bricks Reviews

Jekyll Reviews

React Bricks mentions (11)

• Where do React Server Components fit in the history of web development?

  If you are searching for a headless CMS solution that supports React Server Components, consider exploring React Bricks, co-founded by me, which recently released v4.2, fully supporting server components. It also provides two Next.js starter projects: one is a blank project, while the other one comes with Tailwind CSS, pre-made content blocks, and a blog. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Prismic.io is increasing our price by *1900%* over Christmas

  Have a look at React Bricks (I am the CTO and I am available for a call). Source: 5 months ago

• Does anyone else hate working with builders?

  We hated builders and the DX of Gutenberg used with a modern frontend framework like Next.js. That's why we created React Bricks. Source: 10 months ago

• Next.js Plugin for Contentful CMS Integration - is there anything like this today?

  Have a look also at React BricksReact Bricks! It has native visual editing, it's based on React components and it has 2 starters fir Next.js (empty project and Webdite + blog with Tailwind CSS). Source: 11 months ago

• Marketing team getting technical + the skepticism around that.

  Oh, almost forgot, there's another project called React Bricks (lotsa bricks to go around) which proposes a React-based tightly coupled frontend and backend. It has a higher development cost, but the CMS is embedded in the framework. Source: about 1 year ago

Jekyll mentions (181)

• On the road to ramen profitability 🍜 💸

  A basic marketing site built-on Jekyll and hosted via Cloudflare Pages. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago

• Creating excerpts in Astro

  This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview

  We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  In future, if you want to move from Jekyll to something else, you just have to worry about that `_posts` and `_assets` folder. They may have different naming convention but you can just config-managed it or change it to your choice. This is why I suggested owning that two yourself. You also may not worry about FrontMatter[3] (meta in the header) and its accompanying jazz by asking Jekyll to use the plugins... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago