Based on our record, mozjpeg should be more popular than qooxdoo. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
An AJAX web application framework. Qooxdoo provides support for professional JavaScript development with a graphical user interface (GUI) toolkit and high-level client-server communication. It was first released in 2005. qooxdoo.org. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Qooxdoo: https://qooxdoo.org/ It's a no-html, widget only web framework that's been going for at least 10 years. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
It would be nice if the author would add mozjpeg[1] to the comparison. At certain sizes, it can produce smaller sizes than WebP, and because it is still a jpeg, it has a much better compatibility story, which the author alluded to. [1]https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Image-shrinker is a simple, easy to use open source tool for shrinking images. Under the hood it uses pngquant, mozjpg, SVGO, and gifsicle. You can also install these tools individually if you need to compress some images. I often use pngquantafter exporting PNGs for web projects from Figma or similar tools. I literally run it like this:. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
> MozJPEG is a patch for libjpeg-turbo. Please send pull requests to libjpeg-turbo if the changes aren't specific to newly-added MozJPEG-only compression code. https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg#mozilla-jpeg-encoder-proj.... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
FWIW, Mozilla has been maintaining their own fork for quite a while now[1] AFAIK most Linux Distros have been using libjpeg-turbo as a drop-in replacement for libjpeg, after some drama in ~2010 where libjpeg came under new management, decided to break ABI/API several times over and add incompatible, non-standard format extensions[2]. [1] https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
No. See https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg Also, there is a fairly big problem with JPG that the ‘quality’ setting is not calibrated. That is you might look at one image and think it looks fine (which is subjective, depends on what you want to use the image for…) with a quality of 60%, but then you compress a million images at that rate, delete the originals, then... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.
libjpeg-turbo - libjpeg-turbo is a derivative of libjpeg that uses SIMD instructions (MMX, SSE2, NEON) to...
EnactJS - An app development framework built atop React that’s easy to use, performant and customizable.
Guetzli - JPEG encoder from Google Research that aims for great compression with high visual quality.
Zepto.js - Zepto is a minimalist JavaScript library for modern browsers with a largely jQuery-compatible API.
libjpeg - libjpeg is a widely-used free software library written in C which implements JPEG decoding and...