Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

mozjpeg VS EnactJS

Compare mozjpeg VS EnactJS and see what are their differences

mozjpeg logo mozjpeg

Mozilla JPEG Encoder Project

EnactJS logo EnactJS

An app development framework built atop React that’s easy to use, performant and customizable.
  • mozjpeg Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04
  • EnactJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-25

mozjpeg videos

No mozjpeg videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

EnactJS videos

My Take on Fixed Blades: Spartan Blade Enyo Review

More videos:

  • Review - World's Lightest AR-15! | Master of Arms ENYO
  • Review - Raijintek Enyo - Brilliant idea! But not perfect

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to mozjpeg and EnactJS)
Game Development
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Game Engine
100 100%
0% 0
JS Library
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using mozjpeg and EnactJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare mozjpeg and EnactJS

mozjpeg Reviews

We have no reviews of mozjpeg yet.
Be the first one to post

EnactJS Reviews

12 Best Frameworks and Toolkits to Build Desktop Applications
Enact is a suitable application development framework for developers with expertise in React JS. Using this framework, you can easily develop simple, feature-rich, and customizable desktop applications. Enact comes with a simple command-line tool, which makes installation simpler.
Source: geekflare.com
Frameworks & Tools to Develop Cross-Platform Desktop Apps – Best of
Enyo is an open-source JavaScript framework, like Electron, that allows developers to create native-quality apps for desktop, mobile, and TV. Enyo can run across all the relatively modern and standard web-based environments. It’s battle-tested and comes with a beautiful cross-platform UI toolkit for creating rich user interfaces.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mozjpeg seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

mozjpeg mentions (13)

  • It's the future – you can stop using JPEGs
    It would be nice if the author would add mozjpeg[1] to the comparison. At certain sizes, it can produce smaller sizes than WebP, and because it is still a jpeg, it has a much better compatibility story, which the author alluded to. [1]https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Random Code Inspiration Volume 2
    Image-shrinker is a simple, easy to use open source tool for shrinking images. Under the hood it uses pngquant, mozjpg, SVGO, and gifsicle. You can also install these tools individually if you need to compress some images. I often use pngquantafter exporting PNGs for web projects from Figma or similar tools. I literally run it like this:. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • JPEG XL: How It Started, How It’s Going
    > MozJPEG is a patch for libjpeg-turbo. Please send pull requests to libjpeg-turbo if the changes aren't specific to newly-added MozJPEG-only compression code. https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg#mozilla-jpeg-encoder-proj.... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Why there may never be a libjpeg-turbo 3.1
    FWIW, Mozilla has been maintaining their own fork for quite a while now[1] AFAIK most Linux Distros have been using libjpeg-turbo as a drop-in replacement for libjpeg, after some drama in ~2010 where libjpeg came under new management, decided to break ABI/API several times over and add incompatible, non-standard format extensions[2]. [1] https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Are all JPEG compression implementations the same?
    No. See https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg Also, there is a fairly big problem with JPG that the ‘quality’ setting is not calibrated. That is you might look at one image and think it looks fine (which is subjective, depends on what you want to use the image for…) with a quality of 60%, but then you compress a million images at that rate, delete the originals, then... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

EnactJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of EnactJS yet. Tracking of EnactJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing mozjpeg and EnactJS, you can also consider the following products

libjpeg-turbo - libjpeg-turbo is a derivative of libjpeg that uses SIMD instructions (MMX, SSE2, NEON) to...

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Guetzli - JPEG encoder from Google Research that aims for great compression with high visual quality.

Zepto.js - Zepto is a minimalist JavaScript library for modern browsers with a largely jQuery-compatible API.

libjpeg - libjpeg is a widely-used free software library written in C which implements JPEG decoding and...

qooxdoo - qooxdoo is a universal JavaScript framework that enables you to create applications for a wide...