Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

QB64 VS jRuby

Compare QB64 VS jRuby and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

QB64 logo QB64

Development

jRuby logo jRuby

A high performance, stable, fully threaded Java implementation of the Ruby programming language
  • QB64 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-05
  • jRuby Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-24

QB64 features and specs

  • Compatibility
    QB64 maintains compatibility with QBasic and QuickBASIC code, allowing users to run legacy programs without modification.
  • Cross-Platform
    QB64 is available on major operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux, offering flexibility to developers.
  • Modern Enhancements
    Incorporates modern features such as improved graphics, sound support, and networking capabilities beyond what was possible in the original QBasic.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, QB64 encourages community involvement, transparency, and contributions to the codebase.
  • Ease of Use
    Retains a simple, user-friendly interface that is accessible to beginners while providing powerful features for advanced users.

Possible disadvantages of QB64

  • Performance
    While optimized for modern systems, QB64 can be slower than more contemporary programming languages, particularly for complex applications.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    QB64 lacks the extensive library support and community resources available to more popular languages like Python or Java.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Users familiar with original QBasic may find it challenging to adapt to the newer, advanced features without proper documentation.
  • Niche Use Case
    Its primary appeal is for legacy support and nostalgia, which limits its application in modern, large-scale software development.
  • Legacy Language Constraints
    QB64 inherits some limitations of BASIC, such as less structured programming paradigms, which can impact code clarity and maintainability.

jRuby features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

QB64 videos

+ Add

✅ Trying out QB64 v1.5 with my little platform game - Day 7

More videos:

  • Review - QB64 Report - S01E02 - SCREEN modes
  • Review - Old man Nick tries coding QB/QB64?

jRuby videos

No jRuby videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to QB64 and jRuby)

QB64

jRuby

Programming Language
67 67%
Programming Language
33% 33
IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
OOP
0 0%
OOP
100% 100
Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using QB64 and jRuby. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing QB64 and jRuby, you can also consider the following products

PureBasic - Fantaisie Software Official WebSite. PureBasic - Feel The Pure Power. PureBasic is a programming language based on established BASIC rules.

Scala Lang - Scala is a pure-bred object-oriented language that runs on the JVM

FreeBASIC - FreeBASIC is a completely free, open-source, 32-bit BASIC compiler, with syntax similar to...

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions

PowerBASIC - PowerBASIC, formerly Turbo Basic, is the brand of several commercial compilers by PowerBASIC Inc.

Elixir - Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications

Loading...