Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

PushCrew VS NATS

Compare PushCrew VS NATS and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

PushCrew logo PushCrew

Push Notifications for Websites

NATS logo NATS

NATS.io is an open source messaging system for cloud native applications, IoT messaging, Edge, and microservices architectures.
  • PushCrew Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-28
  • NATS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-05

NATS.io is a connective technology for distributed systems and is a perfect fit to connect devices, edge, cloud or hybrid deployments. True multi-tenancy makes NATS ideal for SaaS and self-healing and scaling technology allows for topology changes anytime with zero downtime.

PushCrew videos

+ Add

PushCrew - Push Notifications for your Website

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Use PushCrew To Enhance Your Marketing Strategy
  • Review - PushCrew Product Tour

NATS videos

+ Add

The coolest OSS project you've never heard of: NATS Getting started!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PushCrew and NATS)

PushCrew

NATS

Web Push Notifications
100 100%
Web Push Notifications
0% 0
Developer Tools
29 29%
Developer Tools
71% 71
Mobile Push Messaging
100 100%
Mobile Push Messaging
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
Data Integration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PushCrew and NATS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare PushCrew and NATS

PushCrew Reviews

We have no reviews of PushCrew yet.
Be the first one to post

NATS Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
NATS is designed to be simple and easy to use, with a small footprint and low latency. It is often used in cloud-native environments to connect different components of a distributed system or to enable communication between microservices. NATS also supports message persistence, security, and clustering, making it a robust messaging system for building scalable and resilient...
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
One challenge of NATS is that it does not support reliable message queuing out of the box - messages can be lost if a client disconnects before it receives them. This can be mitigated by using NATS Streaming, a data streaming system powered by NATS, but it adds complexity.
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
NATS is known for its high performance, low latency, and emphasis on simplicity after it was rewritten in Go. Its rewrite in Go makes NATS an ideal choice for demanding and real-time applications and has increased its throughput compared to its original Ruby implementation.
Source: gcore.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NATS seems to be a lot more popular than PushCrew. While we know about 65 links to NATS, we've tracked only 1 mention of PushCrew. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PushCrew mentions (1)

NATS mentions (65)

  • HN-text: an easy-to-use, text-first Hacker News terminal client
    That sounds awesome. I have actually been working on something similar myself. I have been building a distributed NATS[0] cluster to funnel data down from the internet and index it locally. I also have a local Ollama box wired up to try to do some NLP on it. I started with Benthos to pull in, but since the recent license changes[1] I am rethinking that :( If you would like to collaborate feel free to shoot me an... - Source: Hacker News / 15 days ago
  • Hello World, Simple Event Broker
    I've been happy with NATS, https://nats.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago
  • Implementing OTel Trace Context Propagation Through Message Brokers with Go
    Several message brokers, such as NATS and database queues, are not supported by OpenTelemetry (OTel) SDKs. This article will guide you on how to use context propagation explicitly with these message queues. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • NATS: First Impressions
    Https://nats.io/ (Tracker removed) > Connective Technology for Adaptive Edge & Distributed Systems > An Introduction to NATS - The first screencast I guess I don't need to know what it is. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Sequential and parallel execution of long-running shell commands
    Pueue dumps the state of the queue to the disk as JSON every time the state changes, so when you have a lot of queued jobs this results in considerable disk io. I actually changed it to compress the state file via zstd which helped quite a bit but then eventually just moved on to running NATS [1] locally. [1] https://nats.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PushCrew and NATS, you can also consider the following products

OneSignal - Customer engagement platform used by over 1 million developers and marketers; the fastest and most reliable way to send mobile and web push notifications, in-app messages, emails, and SMS.

Socket.io - Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)

iZooto - Engage your mobile and desktop web users with intelligent web push notifications.

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

Todo.txt - Track your tasks and projects in a plain text file, todo.txt. A todo.

Pusher - Pusher is a hosted API for quickly, easily and securely adding scalable realtime functionality via WebSockets to web and mobile apps.

Loading...