Software Alternatives & Reviews

Puma VS Shell In A Box

Compare Puma VS Shell In A Box and see what are their differences

Puma logo Puma

A concurrent web server for Ruby.

Shell In A Box logo Shell In A Box

Shell In A Box is a web based AJAX terminal emulator that can export arbitrary command line tools...
  • Puma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13
  • Shell In A Box Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06

Puma videos

The Ford Puma has an onboard foot SPA! REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - 2021 Ford Puma review – why it's the best new small SUV on sale | What Car?
  • Review - Ford Puma 2021 review

Shell In A Box videos

No Shell In A Box videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Puma and Shell In A Box)
Web And Application Servers
SSH
0 0%
100% 100
Application Server
100 100%
0% 0
Server Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Puma and Shell In A Box. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Puma and Shell In A Box

Puma Reviews

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is right for you?
There's a reason Puma is the default app server for newly generated Rails apps and on Heroku today: it's easy to configure and mostly "just works" out-of-the-box. It makes a lot of sense to start with Puma and evaluate Passenger as your app grows and needs more advanced features and configuration options.
Source: scoutapm.com

Shell In A Box Reviews

We have no reviews of Shell In A Box yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Puma seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Puma mentions (3)

  • Breaking the 300 barrier
    As we use Puma as our webserver for our rails application, I quickly went to Puma's config file which typically resides in config/puma.rb. The config was set as. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • What's new in Ruby 3.1?
    One more thing - any top-of-mind examples of you squeezing more performance by making similar changes in the context of Puma? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Coming back to Web/Ruby/Rails since 2012. Help?
    Welcome back. It's still the best choice in the Ruby world, well maintained, responsive and new features added. Shopify and github use it, you might want to look at the Rails 6 annoucements what these companies added for scalability features. There've been changes to the asset pipeline since version 3 but you'll still recognize it. You can run Rails as API-only and there's subprojects/tutorials for combining a... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

Shell In A Box mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Shell In A Box yet. Tracking of Shell In A Box recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Puma and Shell In A Box, you can also consider the following products

Phusion Passenger - Phusion Passenger is a multi-language (Ruby, Python, Node) web & app server which can integrate into Apache and Nginx

Wetty - Terminal over HTTP and HTTPS.

Unicorn - Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections.

Bastillion - Bastillion is an open-source web-based SSH console that centrally manages administrative access to systems.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

SSHy - SSHy is a HTML5 SSHv2 web client implementing E2E encryption that runs well on modern web browsers.