Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Shell In A Box VS SSHy

Compare Shell In A Box VS SSHy and see what are their differences

Shell In A Box logo Shell In A Box

Shell In A Box is a web based AJAX terminal emulator that can export arbitrary command line tools...

SSHy logo SSHy

SSHy is a HTML5 SSHv2 web client implementing E2E encryption that runs well on modern web browsers.
  • Shell In A Box Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06
  • SSHy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

Shell In A Box features and specs

  • Web-based Access
    Shell In A Box provides access to a shell directly from a web browser, eliminating the need for additional SSH clients.
  • Portability
    Users can access the shell from any device with a web browser, providing flexibility and convenience.
  • SSL Support
    Shell In A Box supports SSL encryption, enhancing security by encrypting the data transmitted between the server and the client.
  • No Client Installation
    Since it runs in a browser, there is no need for local installation of client software, reducing setup complexity.

Possible disadvantages of Shell In A Box

  • Security Risks
    Running a web-based shell can expose the system to additional attack vectors if not properly secured.
  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to full-featured terminal emulators, Shell In A Box may lack advanced capabilities and customizations.
  • Dependency on Web Browser
    Performance and security depend on the web browser being used, which may vary across different devices and platforms.
  • Obsolete Project
    Since the project is archived on Google Code, it might not receive updates or support, leading to potential compatibility and security issues.

SSHy features and specs

  • Web-Based Interface
    SSHy provides a convenient web-based interface for SSH, allowing users to access remote systems directly from a browser without needing a dedicated SSH client.
  • Portability
    Since SSHy is web-based, it can be accessed from any device with a browser, making it highly portable and versatile for users on different platforms.
  • No Installation Required
    Users do not need to install any software on their local machines, reducing setup time and maintenance requirements.
  • Multi-Platform Support
    As a web application, SSHy supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, through any modern web browser.

Possible disadvantages of SSHy

  • Security Concerns
    Running an SSH client in a web browser can introduce security vulnerabilities, especially if the web server hosting SSHy is not properly secured.
  • Browser Dependency
    The functionality and performance of SSHy may vary depending on the web browser being used, potentially leading to inconsistencies.
  • Limited Feature Set
    Web-based SSH clients like SSHy may not provide all the advanced features available in dedicated SSH clients, which may be required for certain use cases.
  • Network Dependency
    Since SSHy requires a network connection to the host server, it may not be ideal in environments with unreliable or limited connectivity.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Shell In A Box and SSHy)
SSH
53 53%
47% 47
Server Management
53 53%
47% 47
Terminal Tools
56 56%
44% 44
Testing
52 52%
48% 48

User comments

Share your experience with using Shell In A Box and SSHy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Shell In A Box and SSHy, you can also consider the following products

Wetty - Terminal over HTTP and HTTPS.

Bastillion - Bastillion is an open-source web-based SSH console that centrally manages administrative access to systems.

TinyShell - TinyShell is an open source UNIX backdoor.

Gate One - Gate One™ is a web-based Terminal Emulator and SSH client that brings the power of the command line...

Onion Terminal - oterm is a web browser unix terminal.

ttyd - ttyd is a simple command-line tool for sharing terminal over the web.