Software Alternatives & Reviews

Puma VS Oracle WebLogic

Compare Puma VS Oracle WebLogic and see what are their differences

Puma logo Puma

A concurrent web server for Ruby.

Oracle WebLogic logo Oracle WebLogic

Receive a complimentary technical review and consultation on moving your Oracle WebLogic Server applications into containers.
  • Puma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13
  • Oracle WebLogic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23

Puma videos

The Ford Puma has an onboard foot SPA! REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - 2021 Ford Puma review – why it's the best new small SUV on sale | What Car?
  • Review - Ford Puma 2021 review

Oracle WebLogic videos

Oracle Weblogic Machine & Node Manage : For Beginners

More videos:

  • Review - Oracle WebLogic Suite (User: Jordan Braunstein)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Puma and Oracle WebLogic)
Application Server
17 17%
83% 83
Web And Application Servers
Web Servers
29 29%
71% 71
Java
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Puma and Oracle WebLogic. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Puma and Oracle WebLogic

Puma Reviews

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is right for you?
There's a reason Puma is the default app server for newly generated Rails apps and on Heroku today: it's easy to configure and mostly "just works" out-of-the-box. It makes a lot of sense to start with Puma and evaluate Passenger as your app grows and needs more advanced features and configuration options.
Source: scoutapm.com

Oracle WebLogic Reviews

We have no reviews of Oracle WebLogic yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Puma seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Puma mentions (3)

  • Breaking the 300 barrier
    As we use Puma as our webserver for our rails application, I quickly went to Puma's config file which typically resides in config/puma.rb. The config was set as. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • What's new in Ruby 3.1?
    One more thing - any top-of-mind examples of you squeezing more performance by making similar changes in the context of Puma? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Coming back to Web/Ruby/Rails since 2012. Help?
    Welcome back. It's still the best choice in the Ruby world, well maintained, responsive and new features added. Shopify and github use it, you might want to look at the Rails 6 annoucements what these companies added for scalability features. There've been changes to the asset pipeline since version 3 but you'll still recognize it. You can run Rails as API-only and there's subprojects/tutorials for combining a... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

Oracle WebLogic mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Oracle WebLogic yet. Tracking of Oracle WebLogic recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Puma and Oracle WebLogic, you can also consider the following products

Phusion Passenger - Phusion Passenger is a multi-language (Ruby, Python, Node) web & app server which can integrate into Apache and Nginx

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Unicorn - Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections.

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

vCenter Server - IaaS platform for managing and deploying virtual machines