Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Puma VS GitHub Pages

Compare Puma VS GitHub Pages and see what are their differences

Zoho CRM
Omnichannel CRM for Businesses of all sizes featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Puma logo Puma

A concurrent web server for Ruby.

GitHub Pages logo GitHub Pages

A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub
  • Puma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13
  • GitHub Pages Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-19

Puma videos

+ Add

The Ford Puma has an onboard foot SPA! REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - 2021 Ford Puma review – why it's the best new small SUV on sale | What Car?
  • Review - Ford Puma 2021 review

GitHub Pages videos

+ Add

Intro to GitHub Pages

More videos:

  • Review - What is GitHub Pages?
  • Tutorial - How to Setup GitHub Pages (2020) | Data Science Portfolio

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Puma and GitHub Pages)

Puma

GitHub Pages

Application Server
100 100%
Application Server
0% 0
Static Site Generators
0 0%
Static Site Generators
100% 100
Web And Application Servers
100 100%
Web And Application Servers
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
Cloud Computing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Puma and GitHub Pages. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Puma and GitHub Pages

Puma Reviews

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is right for you?
There's a reason Puma is the default app server for newly generated Rails apps and on Heroku today: it's easy to configure and mostly "just works" out-of-the-box. It makes a lot of sense to start with Puma and evaluate Passenger as your app grows and needs more advanced features and configuration options.
Source: scoutapm.com

GitHub Pages Reviews

Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Static Site Generators — It is a good way for developers to build sites on GitHub pages with the help of site generators. Yes, it has the ability to publish and release any static file. But it is recommended to proceed with Jekyll.
Source: blog.back4app.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Pages seems to be a lot more popular than Puma. While we know about 466 links to GitHub Pages, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Puma. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Puma mentions (3)

  • Breaking the 300 barrier
    As we use Puma as our webserver for our rails application, I quickly went to Puma's config file which typically resides in config/puma.rb. The config was set as. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • What's new in Ruby 3.1?
    One more thing - any top-of-mind examples of you squeezing more performance by making similar changes in the context of Puma? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Coming back to Web/Ruby/Rails since 2012. Help?
    Welcome back. It's still the best choice in the Ruby world, well maintained, responsive and new features added. Shopify and github use it, you might want to look at the Rails 6 annoucements what these companies added for scalability features. There've been changes to the asset pipeline since version 3 but you'll still recognize it. You can run Rails as API-only and there's subprojects/tutorials for combining a... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

GitHub Pages mentions (466)

  • Yet Another Tour of an Open-Source Elm SPA
    For this application, Elm controlled the routing. So, I had to adapt the scripts to deploy to Netlify instead of GitHub Pages. Why? Because you need to be able to tell the web server to redirect all relevant requests to the application. GitHub Pages doesn't have support for it. - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
  • How to build your interactive resume in 4 simple and 2 easy steps
    It's super easy to publish a static site like the resume with GitHub Pages. Just check out the docs. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • 100+ FREE Resources Every Web Developer Must Try
    GitHub Pages: Host your static websites directly from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform
    As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Top 20 Free Static Web Hosting Services in 2024 ⚡️
    Ideal for open source projects, docs sites, and portfolios. GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Puma and GitHub Pages, you can also consider the following products

Phusion Passenger - Phusion Passenger is a multi-language (Ruby, Python, Node) web & app server which can integrate into Apache and Nginx

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

Unicorn - Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections.

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket

Loading...