Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Portmaster VS Apache Traffic Server

Compare Portmaster VS Apache Traffic Server and see what are their differences

Portmaster logo Portmaster

Is a Privacy Modular Privacy App which includes a "DNS over TLS" feature as well as an "Application Firewall".

Apache Traffic Server logo Apache Traffic Server

Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.
  • Portmaster Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-21
  • Apache Traffic Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

Portmaster videos

The Portmaster is Out in Pre-Alpha! - Progress Update #3

Apache Traffic Server videos

Transparent HTTP proxying with Apache Traffic Server

More videos:

  • Review - Yahoo's Adventure with Apache Traffic Server - Shu Kit Chan, Vijay Prashanth Hosahithlu

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Portmaster and Apache Traffic Server)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Proxy Server
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Proxy
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Portmaster and Apache Traffic Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Portmaster seems to be a lot more popular than Apache Traffic Server. While we know about 58 links to Portmaster, we've tracked only 5 mentions of Apache Traffic Server. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Portmaster mentions (58)

  • Manjaro is a free and open source Linux operating system that emphasizes privacy
    Manjaro actually includes Portmaster [0] as a package [1], which is now being moved to "extra". [0] https://safing.io/portmaster [1] https://software.manjaro.org/package/portmaster-stub. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Google contacts sync foss alternative
    I get it, but running an outdated OS with no patching is height risk for security, consider the tradeoff. If I'm not mistaken W7 is not supported anymore, meaning you are exposed to vulnerabilities. Consider checking online guides on how to harden W10 or consider migrating to a modern Linux distribution, that can even run some Windows programs. It is true that has reliability issues. VMs are another option and... Source: over 1 year ago
  • What do you guys think of Chromium-based Browsers or whatever engine it is made out of?
    Wouldn't a software like PiHole or Safing Portmaster help in this regard than to rely on ublock origin? Source: over 1 year ago
  • Do I need a firewall?
    You could look at something like Portmaster https://safing.io/portmaster/. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Is there a free and trustworthy Firewall
    You can also check Portmaster that is still on Alpha, but looks promising. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

Apache Traffic Server mentions (5)

  • Wikipedia now has up to 1000X reduction of ATS disk read latency at the p999
    Apache Traffic Server: https://trafficserver.apache.org/ Here’s how they use it along with Varnish: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Caching_overview. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • How does Content delivery/distribution network work?
    The LARGE majority of CDNs use either Apache Traffic Server (https://trafficserver.apache.org/) or Nginx for their cache webserver, so the mechanisms used are pretty easy to find if you look through the docs. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Using Nginx as an Object Storage Gateway
    Apache Traffic Server (no relation to Apache itself) would be an excellent option: https://trafficserver.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Build a CDN in about 5 hours
    We have choices. We could use Varnish (scripting! Edge side includes! PHK blog posts!). We could use Apache Traffic Server (being the only new team this year to use ATS!). Or we could use NGINX (we're already running it!). The only certainty is that you'll come to hate whichever one you pick. Try them all and pick the one you hate the least. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Isp.netscape.com
    I was curious if I could find anything out about their stack. Turns out they are using something called Apache Traffic Server[0]. > Formerly a commercial product, Yahoo! Donated it to the Apache Foundation [0] http://trafficserver.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Portmaster and Apache Traffic Server, you can also consider the following products

TinyWall - Lightweight and non-intrusive firewall

Squid Proxy - Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.

simplewall - Simple tool to configure Windows Filtering Platform (WFP) which can configure network activity on...

3proxy - 3proxy freeware proxy server for Windows and Unix. HTTP, SOCKS, FTP, POP3

NetLimiter - NetLimiter is an ultimate Internet traffic control and monitoring tool designed for Windows.

CCProxy - Want to share Internet connection? Get every computer online through a single Internet connection?