Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Podman VS Apache Portable Runtime

Compare Podman VS Apache Portable Runtime and see what are their differences

Podman logo Podman

Simple debugging tool for pods and images

Apache Portable Runtime logo Apache Portable Runtime

The Apache Portable Runtime (APR) is a supporting library for the Apache web server.
  • Podman Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30
  • Apache Portable Runtime Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16

Podman features and specs

  • Daemonless Architecture
    Podman does not require a daemon to run containers, which simplifies its architecture and minimizes the potential attack surface.
  • Rootless Containers
    Podman allows running containers as a non-root user, enhancing security by reducing the risk associated with running processes as the root user.
  • Kubernetes Support
    Podman has built-in support for Kubernetes, enabling easier transition and orchestration of containers at scale.
  • Compatibility with Docker CLI
    Podman provides a Docker-compatible command line interface, making it easy for users to migrate from Docker with minimal changes to their workflows.
  • Enhanced Security
    With features like user namespaces and no central daemon, Podman offers improved security compared to traditional container runtimes.
  • Open Source
    Podman is an open-source project, which provides transparency and community-driven development.

Possible disadvantages of Podman

  • Limited Ecosystem
    The ecosystem around Podman is not as extensive as that of Docker, potentially limiting the availability of third-party tools and integrations.
  • Learning Curve
    Users familiar with Docker may face a learning curve when adapting to some of Podman’s unique features and CLI differences.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running rootless containers can introduce some performance overhead due to the additional layers of user namespace translation.
  • Less Mature
    Podman is relatively newer compared to Docker, which means it might not be as battle-tested in enterprise environments.
  • Inconsistent Behavior
    Certain Podman features may behave differently than Docker, which might lead to unexpected issues during container management and automation.

Apache Portable Runtime features and specs

  • Portability
    APR provides a consistent API across various platforms, enabling developers to write applications that are portable between different operating systems.
  • Performance
    APR is designed to provide high-performance solutions for common programming tasks, such as file I/O, network communication, and memory management, optimized for each supported platform.
  • Rich API Set
    APR provides a comprehensive set of APIs for handling tasks like file operations, network sockets, shared memory, and threading, which can simplify application development.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source library, APR allows developers to inspect, modify, and distribute the source code, fostering community collaboration and trust.
  • Apache Integration
    APR is used by Apache HTTP Server and other Apache projects, offering proven stability and performance tested in enterprise environments.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Portable Runtime

  • Complexity
    The wide range of functionality and extensive API set can introduce complexity, making the learning curve steeper for new developers.
  • Limited Language Support
    APR is primarily designed for use with C and C++. Developers using other programming languages may find it less accessible or require additional bindings.
  • Platform Specific Issues
    Despite its goal of portability, certain platform-specific issues or limitations may arise, requiring additional effort to ensure consistent application behavior.
  • Dependency Overhead
    Using APR can introduce additional dependencies into a project, potentially complicating the build process and increasing the size of the deployed application.
  • Not Always Necessary
    For applications that do not require cross-platform compatibility or for environments where minimal external dependencies are preferred, the use of APR might not be justified.

Podman videos

PODMAN vs DOCKER - should you switch now?

More videos:

  • Review - Actually, podman Might Be Better Than docker
  • Review - Container (Podman) Review - Kominfo PROA Training Lab 2

Apache Portable Runtime videos

No Apache Portable Runtime videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Podman and Apache Portable Runtime)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
87 87%
13% 13
OS & Utilities
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Podman and Apache Portable Runtime. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Podman and Apache Portable Runtime

Podman Reviews

Podman vs Docker: Comparing the Two Containerization Tools
Rootless processes. Because of its daemonless architecture, Podman can perform truly rootless operations. Users do not have to be granted root privileges to run Podman commands, and Podman does not have to rely on a root-privileged process.
Source: www.linode.com

Apache Portable Runtime Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Portable Runtime yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Podman seems to be a lot more popular than Apache Portable Runtime. While we know about 123 links to Podman, we've tracked only 5 mentions of Apache Portable Runtime. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Podman mentions (123)

View more

Apache Portable Runtime mentions (5)

  • Giving C++ std:regex a C makeover
    Something like that would probably end up similar to GLib or the Apache Portable Runtime. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/ https://apr.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • My review of the C standard library in practice
    There are many libraries available that you can use as a libc replacement instead of CCAN, if that’s what you prefer [1-3]. Taking on a beefy dependency like that can be overkill, though, if all you need is a linked list or dynamic array implementation. [1] http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/ [2] http://apr.apache.org/ [3] https://libcork.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Is there a custom "C Standard Library" out there?
    There are many. APR is one of them. APR stands for Apache Portable Runtime. It includes arrays(aprarray) and hash tables(aprhash), but not trees. Source: over 2 years ago
  • A C Standard Library
    A library that already implements some of this called libapr is what I’d consider a good example of libraries of this Ilk. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Git's list of banned C functions
    It's not really complacency: it's that the standard library is intentionally minimalistic to maintain portability and backwards compatibility. If you want sensible string handling, it's usually best to use a high level utility library like GLib(https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/) or Apache Portable Runtime(http://apr.apache.org/), or roll your own safe string type (preferably non-null terminating). - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Podman and Apache Portable Runtime, you can also consider the following products

containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability

rkt - App Container runtime

Flox - Manage and share development environments with all the frameworks and libraries you need, then publish artifacts anywhere. Harness the power of Nix.

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

Buildah - Buildah is a web-based OCI container tool that allows you to manage the wide range of images in your OCI container and helps you to build the image container from the scratch.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.