Software Alternatives & Reviews

containerd VS Apache Portable Runtime

Compare containerd VS Apache Portable Runtime and see what are their differences

containerd logo containerd

An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability

Apache Portable Runtime logo Apache Portable Runtime

The Apache Portable Runtime (APR) is a supporting library for the Apache web server.
  • containerd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-15
  • Apache Portable Runtime Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16

containerd videos

Deep Dive: containerd - Derek McGowan, Docker & Phil Estes, IBM Cloud

Apache Portable Runtime videos

No Apache Portable Runtime videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to containerd and Apache Portable Runtime)
Cloud Computing
78 78%
22% 22
Cloud Storage
68 68%
32% 32
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Storage
53 53%
47% 47

User comments

Share your experience with using containerd and Apache Portable Runtime. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare containerd and Apache Portable Runtime

containerd Reviews

5 Container Alternatives to Docker
containerd is described as “an industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability.” An incubating project of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, containerd is available as a daemon for Linux or Windows.

Apache Portable Runtime Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Portable Runtime yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, containerd seems to be a lot more popular than Apache Portable Runtime. While we know about 45 links to containerd, we've tracked only 4 mentions of Apache Portable Runtime. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

containerd mentions (45)

View more

Apache Portable Runtime mentions (4)

  • My review of the C standard library in practice
    There are many libraries available that you can use as a libc replacement instead of CCAN, if that’s what you prefer [1-3]. Taking on a beefy dependency like that can be overkill, though, if all you need is a linked list or dynamic array implementation. [1] http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/ [2] http://apr.apache.org/ [3] https://libcork.io/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Is there a custom "C Standard Library" out there?
    There are many. APR is one of them. APR stands for Apache Portable Runtime. It includes arrays(aprarray) and hash tables(aprhash), but not trees. Source: over 1 year ago
  • A C Standard Library
    A library that already implements some of this called libapr is what I’d consider a good example of libraries of this Ilk. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Git's list of banned C functions
    It's not really complacency: it's that the standard library is intentionally minimalistic to maintain portability and backwards compatibility. If you want sensible string handling, it's usually best to use a high level utility library like GLib(https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/) or Apache Portable Runtime(http://apr.apache.org/), or roll your own safe string type (preferably non-null terminating). - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing containerd and Apache Portable Runtime, you can also consider the following products

rkt - App Container runtime

GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.

CRI-O - Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.

Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images

REX-Ray - Runtime