Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Pixi.js VS Phaser

Compare Pixi.js VS Phaser and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Pixi.js logo Pixi.js

Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

Phaser logo Phaser

Desktop and Mobile HTML5 game framework. A fast, free and fun open source framework for Canvas and WebGL powered browser games.
  • Pixi.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-14
  • Phaser Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-12

Pixi.js features and specs

  • High Performance
    Pixi.js utilizes WebGL to deliver high-performance rendering, which is ideal for building fast and responsive web applications and games.
  • Cross-Platform
    It supports multiple platforms, allowing developers to build applications that work seamlessly across different devices, including desktops, tablets, and smartphones.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Pixi.js has comprehensive and well-documented resources that help developers understand how to use the library effectively, including tutorials and examples.
  • Rich Feature Set
    The library comes with a wide range of features such as textures, sprites, and filters, enabling developers to create visually complex and appealing content.
  • Active Community
    Pixi.js benefits from a large and active community, which means frequent updates, a wealth of plugins, and abundant community support.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source library, Pixi.js is free to use and modify, making it accessible to developers with different levels of expertise and budgets.

Possible disadvantages of Pixi.js

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its extensive documentation, beginners may find Pixi.js challenging to learn and integrate into their projects because of its extensive feature set.
  • WebGL Dependencies
    While WebGL provides high performance, it can also cause compatibility issues on older devices or browsers that do not fully support WebGL.
  • Limited 3D Capabilities
    Pixi.js is primarily a 2D rendering engine, so it may not be suitable for projects that require advanced 3D graphics and interactions.
  • Size
    Compared to simpler libraries, Pixi.js can be relatively large in terms of file size, which could impact the loading times of web applications, especially on slower networks.
  • Complex Debugging
    Debugging issues in Pixi.js can be complex, especially in large applications, as it often involves low-level graphics operations and WebGL debugging tools.

Phaser features and specs

  • Open Source
    Phaser is an open-source game framework, which means it's free to use and has a large community contributing to its continuous improvement.
  • Cross-Platform
    Phaser allows developers to create games that run smoothly on both desktop and mobile browsers, enabling a broad reach to different audiences.
  • Rich Documentation
    Phaser offers extensive documentation and a plethora of tutorials, examples, and community support, making it easier for new developers to get started.
  • Built-in Physics
    Phaser includes several physics engines like Arcade Physics, helping developers add complex physics interactions to their games without extra dependencies.
  • Asset Management
    Phaser provides robust asset management capabilities, simplifying the process of loading and managing game assets like images, audio, and spritesheets.

Possible disadvantages of Phaser

  • Learning Curve
    While Phaser is powerful, it might have a steeper learning curve for complete beginners compared to other more beginner-focused frameworks.
  • Performance
    Games developed with Phaser may sometimes face performance bottlenecks, especially on lower-end devices, depending on the game's complexity.
  • JavaScript-Based
    As a JavaScript-based framework, Phaser might not appeal to developers who prefer strongly typed languages or are not comfortable with JavaScript.
  • Limited 3D Support
    Phaser is predominantly a 2D game framework, offering only limited support for 3D games, which might not be suitable for developers looking to create 3D content.
  • Dependence on Community Contributions
    Being open-source, the framework’s growth and support heavily depend on community contributions, which can be less predictable compared to commercial frameworks.

Pixi.js videos

PixiJS Crash Course

Phaser videos

Phaser | Tower Reviews | Tower Battles [ROBLOX]

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Phaser.io Tutorial - Pros and Cons of Phaser and How It Works
  • Review - TC Electronic Helix - Phaser Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Pixi.js and Phaser)
Javascript UI Libraries
79 79%
21% 21
Game Development
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Game Engine
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Pixi.js and Phaser. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Pixi.js and Phaser

Pixi.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Pixi.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Phaser Reviews

Best Game Engines for 2023 – Which Should You Use?
If you’re ready to expand your HTML5 game development skills with Phaser, check out these courses! Alternatively, you might also like these completely free Phaser tutorials, as well as our free Phaser ebook. There are also some courses on HTML5 and Phaser offered as part of Zenva Schools, a platform made for easy classroom learning and teaching for schools.
The Best Gaming Engines You Should Consider for 2023
Another open-source platform, Phaser is a HTML5 game dev framework designed for creating 2D games and interactive experiences.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Phaser seems to be a lot more popular than Pixi.js. While we know about 124 links to Phaser, we've tracked only 5 mentions of Pixi.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Pixi.js mentions (5)

  • Release Radar • March 2024 Edition
    If you're into video game dev, then PixiJS is something you need to know about. It's a HTML5 game engine that provides a lightweight 2D library across all devices. This latest update has a new package structure, custom builds, graphics API overhaul, and lots more. You can read about all these changes in the PixiJS Migration Guide. Also big congrats to PixiJS for being part of the open source community for ten... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Advice about useful libraries to create a 2D car game (hill climb racing style)
    I would need a renderer to display the graphics of my calculations on the "backend". After some research I think pixijs which is written in TS could be a great tool. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is programming just not for me?
    And if that seems to up your alley you could look into Javascript game/renderer frameworks. They have 2D engines like https://github.com/photonstorm/phaser or https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs . Or my personal choice A-Frame which is a 3D, AR and VR engine (XR) https://github.com/aframevr/ . Source: over 2 years ago
  • Pixie – A full-featured 2D graphics library for Nim
    This has a high risk of being confused with pixi.js: https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Custome game engine: what stack ?
    WebGL, I hear, has a similar API to OpenGL. (Also, WebGPU is coming at some point.) Or, you could use a thin library that handles the WebGL drawing of sprites for you. I prefer that option over using a full game engine: I find it's better to only include dependencies when they become necessary. I recently tried a web rendering library called PixiJS, and it seemed like a pretty clean and nice-sized API, and... Source: almost 4 years ago

Phaser mentions (124)

  • Dev Log #14 - Phaser.js and game dev
    I've started working on a simple interactive version of my portfolio using Phaser.js. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Ask HN: Platform for 11 year old to create video games?
    Https://phaser.io/. It’s more of a game framework in JavaScript with built in libraries for collision. The getting started tutorial is decent/short and gives a good idea of what is going on. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Mundane Blaster - Web Game Challange 👽
    This is first time I used Phaser for making a game but it's a very nice and easy HTML5 framework and I follow tutorial to use phaser and after few of them, I tried to add few things and make the gameplay how I would enjoy, so I learn about spritesheets and audios and then how many states we have to keep in mind while building a game, like preload(), create() and update() and how to manage these before adding... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Achieving Success in Online Learning: A Practical Guide
    Phasor which uses TypeScript or JavaScript. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • 3 years of fulltime Rust game development, and why we're leaving Rust behind
    If you're targeting the browser first why not use a browser first library like PhaserJS [0]?. I don't see a reason to work around with WASM; HTML5 canvas might be everything that you need. [0] https://phaser.io/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Pixi.js and Phaser, you can also consider the following products

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

Unity - The multiplatform game creation tools for everyone.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Godot Engine - Feature-packed 2D and 3D open source game engine.

D3.js - D3.js is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. D3 helps you bring data to life using HTML, SVG, and CSS.

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.