No OWASP Dependency-Track videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Gitea should be more popular than OWASP Dependency-Track. It has been mentiond 60 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I've become interested in SBOM recently, and found there were great tools like https://dependencytrack.org/ for CycloneDX SBOMs, but all I have is SPDX SBOMs generated by GitHub. I decided to have a go at writing my own dependency track esque tool aiming to integrate with the APIs GitHub provides. It's pretty limited in functionality so far, but can give a high level summary of the types of licenses your... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
To detect these types of vulnerabilities, we should first and foremost know our dependencies and versions, and which of them have vulnerabilities. The OWASP Top 10 2021 identifies this need as A06:2021-Vulnerable and Outdated Components. OWASP has several tools for this, including Dependency Check and Dependency Track. These tools will warn about the use of components with vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Https://dependencytrack.org/ You just need to use one of the various tools out there to scan. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
OWASP Dependency Track - https://dependencytrack.org/. Source: 12 months ago
I actually want to build the same thing you are after, and I think I’ll go for the setup you describe in idea 2. The tool you can use for this is Trivy (https://trivy.dev), have it generate a SBOM and send it to Dependencytrack (https://dependencytrack.org). Source: over 1 year ago
This reminds me of Gogs [0], where the original author refused a lot of good ideas and improvements, eventually leading to a fork [1] that's now a lot more popular and active than the original. [0] https://gogs.io/ [1] https://gitea.io/en-us/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Yes, we do this using https://gitea.io/en-us/ on a private server. Firewall, backups and a replica running for most projects. Github is only used when it's required by a stakeholder. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
There's a number of places out there, some of which also support alternatives to Git itself. By no means a complete list and in no particular order: GitLab - https://about.gitlab.com/ Sourcehut - https://sourcehut.org/ Codeberg - https://codeberg.org/ Launchpad - https://launchpad.net/ Debian Salsa - https://salsa.debian.org/public Pagure - https://pagure.io/pagure For self hsoted options, there's these below... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
And if you need GitLab (for runner, etc...) then it's not too bad to run in Docker. But if anyone is looking for a somewhat simpler git solution, gitea is pretty great. Source: about 1 year ago
Check: Configuration and syntax changes and Special packages. The latter includes changes on PostgreSQL, Python and Gitea. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
FOSSA - Open source license compliance and dependency analysis
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
WhiteSource - Find & fix security and compliance issues in open source libraries in real-time.
BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.