Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OWASP Dependency-Track VS FOSSA

Compare OWASP Dependency-Track VS FOSSA and see what are their differences

OWASP Dependency-Track logo OWASP Dependency-Track

OWASP Dependency-Track is an intelligent Software Composition Analysis (SCA) platform that allows...

FOSSA logo FOSSA

Open source license compliance and dependency analysis
  • OWASP Dependency-Track Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-03
  • FOSSA Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17

OWASP Dependency-Track features and specs

  • Proactive Vulnerability Management
    Dependency-Track allows organizations to proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities in their software dependencies. By continuously monitoring and analyzing the components in use, it helps in preventing potential security breaches before they are exploited.
  • Comprehensive Reporting and Analytics
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics on the security status of an organization's dependencies. This aids in tracking the risk profile over time, making informed decisions, and prioritizing remediation efforts effectively.
  • Integration with CI/CD Pipelines
    Dependency-Track can be seamlessly integrated into continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, ensuring that dependencies are automatically assessed for vulnerabilities as part of the software development lifecycle, enhancing security without disrupting development processes.
  • Support for Multiple Package Ecosystems
    Offering support for a wide range of package ecosystems, Dependency-Track can analyze components from various sources, making it versatile and applicable to a broad spectrum of technology stacks used by different organizations.
  • Open Source and Community-Driven
    Being an open-source project, Dependency-Track benefits from community contributions, which enhances its features, security, and reliability over time. It allows users to customize and adapt the tool according to their specific requirements.

Possible disadvantages of OWASP Dependency-Track

  • Complex Setup and Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration of Dependency-Track can be complex and time-consuming, especially for organizations that are new to vulnerability management tools. It may require a steep learning curve for effective use.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Dependency-Track, particularly in an enterprise environment with many projects and dependencies, can be resource-intensive, requiring significant computational power and storage, which may result in increased operational costs.
  • False Positives and Negatives
    Like many automated security tools, Dependency-Track may occasionally report false positives or fail to identify certain vulnerabilities (false negatives). This necessitates manual verification, which can be time-consuming and might require additional expertise.
  • Dependence on External Data Sources
    Dependency-Track relies on external vulnerability databases and data sources for its analyses (such as the National Vulnerability Database). Any inaccuracies or updates to these data sources can directly affect the accuracy of its vulnerability assessments.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    The tool's functionality is somewhat limited in offline environments because it needs access to external vulnerability databases for the most current information, which can restrict its usage in isolated networks or environments with strict internet usage policies.

FOSSA features and specs

  • Comprehensive License Management
    FOSSA provides comprehensive tools for managing open source licenses, ensuring compliance and reducing the risk of legal issues.
  • Automated Dependency Analysis
    The platform automatically analyzes project dependencies, saving time and reducing the effort required to manually track and manage them.
  • Continuous Monitoring
    FOSSA offers continuous monitoring of codebases for license issues and vulnerabilities, keeping projects up-to-date with minimal manual intervention.
  • Integration Capabilities
    FOSSA integrates seamlessly with various development tools and platforms such as GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and more, enhancing workflow efficiency.
  • Detailed Reporting
    The platform generates detailed reports on compliance and security, providing clear insights and actionable information for developers and legal teams.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    FOSSA features an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Scalability
    FOSSA can scale to manage the needs of both small and large enterprises, catering to a wide range of project sizes and complexities.

Possible disadvantages of FOSSA

  • Learning Curve
    New users may experience a steep learning curve as they familiarize themselves with the comprehensive features and functionalities of FOSSA.
  • Cost
    License and subscription fees for FOSSA can be high, particularly for smaller organizations or individual developers.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported occasional performance issues, such as slow scans, especially with projects that have a large number of dependencies.
  • False Positives
    There can be instances of false positives in license and vulnerability detections, which require manual verification and resolution.
  • Customization Limitations
    Customization options may be limited, making it challenging for some users to tailor the platform’s features to their specific workflow needs.

OWASP Dependency-Track videos

No OWASP Dependency-Track videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

FOSSA videos

Review: FOSSA 5.56 Flash Hider - White Sound Defense

More videos:

  • Review - Ubuntu 20.04 LTS Focal Fossa Review | Best Linux Distro of 2020 (And The Fastest? )
  • Review - White Sound Defense FOSSA-556 AR-15 Muzzle Device Test And Review (HD)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OWASP Dependency-Track and FOSSA)
Security
49 49%
51% 51
Code Analysis
49 49%
51% 51
Open Source
49 49%
51% 51
Web Application Security
48 48%
52% 52

User comments

Share your experience with using OWASP Dependency-Track and FOSSA. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OWASP Dependency-Track should be more popular than FOSSA. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OWASP Dependency-Track mentions (19)

  • Show HN: Pre-alpha tool for analyzing spdx SBOMs generated by GitHub
    I've become interested in SBOM recently, and found there were great tools like https://dependencytrack.org/ for CycloneDX SBOMs, but all I have is SPDX SBOMs generated by GitHub. I decided to have a go at writing my own dependency track esque tool aiming to integrate with the APIs GitHub provides. It's pretty limited in functionality so far, but can give a high level summary of the types of licenses your... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • SQL Injection Isn't Dead Yet
    To detect these types of vulnerabilities, we should first and foremost know our dependencies and versions, and which of them have vulnerabilities. The OWASP Top 10 2021 identifies this need as A06:2021-Vulnerable and Outdated Components. OWASP has several tools for this, including Dependency Check and Dependency Track. These tools will warn about the use of components with vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Krita fund has 0 corporate support
    Https://dependencytrack.org/ You just need to use one of the various tools out there to scan. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Friends - needs help choosing solution for SBOM vulnerability
    OWASP Dependency Track - https://dependencytrack.org/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • software inventory of my ECS tasks
    I actually want to build the same thing you are after, and I think I’ll go for the setup you describe in idea 2. The tool you can use for this is Trivy (https://trivy.dev), have it generate a SBOM and send it to Dependencytrack (https://dependencytrack.org). Source: over 2 years ago
View more

FOSSA mentions (8)

  • How We Started Continuous OSS License Monitoring with License Finder
    For now, we plan to continue using License Finder while keeping SaaS options like FOSSA in mind. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • A list of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS offerings that have free tiers of interest to devops and infradev
    FOSSA - Scalable, end-to-end management for third-party code, license compliance and vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • The Haskell job market has been growing steaily since 2008
    For us, there were a couple advantages. For context, I work at FOSSA (https://fossa.com/). Our core product solves software supply chain needs in enterprises (around licensing and security), and our core technology is around compiler, build, and source code analysis. Off the top of my head, 3 advantages stood out: 1. First, if you're not going that far off the beaten low-level path, Haskell has incredible... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • How to Automate the Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
    In this example, we'll explain how to create SBOM with FOSSA, an open-source dependency management tool ranked as the most significant SCA solution by the Forrester Wave. It helps you protect your software from open source risks such as supply chain threats and license violations. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • SBOM management
    I saw https://fossa.com/ and https://anchore.com/ which seem to solve what I have in mind but I wanted to know if there's maybe an open source way of getting a better overview besides running trivy sbom everytime I want to know something about a given sbom file. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OWASP Dependency-Track and FOSSA, you can also consider the following products

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

WhiteSource - Find & fix security and compliance issues in open source libraries in real-time.

Black Duck Software Composition Analysis - Black Duck Software Composition Analysis (SCA) provides a solution for managing open source security, quality, and license compliance risks that comes from the use of open source and third-party code.

Quick License Manager - Quick License Manager (QLM) is a license protection framework that creates professional and secure license keys to protect software against piracy.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

ScanCode - ScanCode is a suite of utilities used to scan a codebase for license, copyright and other...