Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

OpenShift VS Fossil

Compare OpenShift VS Fossil and see what are their differences

Setuply
Setuply: Transform Clients into Brand Advocates. An AI-powered, purpose-built platform for client onboarding and lifecycle management, helping B2B teams accelerate revenue recognition, boost retention, and scale operations with confidence. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

OpenShift logo OpenShift

OpenShift gives you all the tools you need to develop, host and scale your apps in the public or private cloud. Get started today.

Fossil logo Fossil

Simple, high-reliability, distributed software configuration management
  • OpenShift Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15
  • Fossil Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23

OpenShift features and specs

  • Comprehensive Platform
    OpenShift provides a complete Kubernetes-based container platform, including a strong set of integrated tools such as CI/CD pipelines, monitoring, and logging, which simplifies the development and deployment of applications.
  • Hybrid and Multi-Cloud Support
    OpenShift supports hybrid and multi-cloud deployments, enabling organizations to build, deploy, and manage applications across on-premises infrastructure and multiple cloud providers.
  • Enterprise-grade Security
    It offers robust security features, including role-based access control (RBAC), built-in authentication and authorization, and integrated vulnerability scanning, ensuring secure application development and deployment.
  • Developer Productivity
    OpenShift boosts developer productivity with features like source-to-image (S2I) builds, self-service environments, and a rich catalog of pre-configured application templates and runtimes.
  • Scalability and High Availability
    It is designed to scale applications seamlessly and ensure high availability with automated horizontal pod scaling, load balancing, and failover capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of OpenShift

  • Complexity
    The comprehensive nature of OpenShift can lead to increased complexity, particularly for small teams or organizations without prior Kubernetes or container orchestration experience.
  • Cost
    Enterprise-grade features come with significant licensing costs, which might be a barrier for startups and small to medium-sized enterprises.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive range of features and integrations, there can be a steep learning curve for administrators and developers new to the platform.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    While OpenShift supports hybrid and multi-cloud environments, there can be concerns about vendor lock-in due to the level of customization and proprietary features specific to Red Hat's implementation.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running OpenShift efficiently requires substantial computational resources and infrastructure, which might be challenging for organizations with limited IT resources.

Fossil features and specs

  • Version Control Integration
    Fossil is a distributed version control system that integrates bug tracking, a wiki, and a blog, providing a comprehensive development environment in one tool.
  • Self-Contained
    Fossil is a single executable that contains everything needed, making it easy to install and manage with low dependency overhead.
  • Simple UI
    Fossil includes a built-in, easy-to-use web interface that allows users to browse repositories, manage tickets, and handle wiki content without needing separate tools.
  • SQLite Backend
    Fossil uses an SQLite database to store all its data, making it reliable, efficient, and easy to backup and transfer.
  • Integrated Bug Tracking
    The integrated bug tracking system allows developers to manage issues and bugs directly within the same environment, streamlining the workflow.
  • Cross-Platform
    Fossil is designed to work on multiple operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, ensuring a consistent experience across different environments.
  • Strong Documentation
    Fossil comes with extensive documentation and a supportive community, which helps users quickly get up to speed and solve issues.

Possible disadvantages of Fossil

  • Niche User Base
    Fossil has a relatively small user base compared to more popular version control systems like Git, which may result in fewer resources and community support.
  • Limited Third-Party Integration
    Due to its smaller market share, Fossil has fewer integrations and third-party tools available compared to its competitors, limiting extensibility.
  • Learning Curve
    Users new to Fossil might find its all-in-one approach with integrated tools to be complex initially, especially if they are accustomed to using separate systems for version control, bug tracking, and wikis.
  • Performance
    While suitable for many projects, Fossil might not perform as well as other VCS systems when handling very large repositories or extremely high volumes of transactions.
  • UI Customization
    The built-in web interface, while simple and functional, may lack the level of customization and modern design aesthetics that some users expect.

OpenShift videos

+ Add

OpenShift Container Platform by RedHat | Kubernetes Made Easy | Tech Primers

More videos:

  • Review - Open Source PaaS - OpenShift Review Part 1
  • Review - Red Hat OpenShift overview

Fossil videos

+ Add

Why Is EVERYONE Giving This Watch 5 Stars?! - A Brutally Honest Fossil Watch Review

More videos:

  • Review - What Happened To Fossil Watches?
  • Tutorial - Fossil watch real vs. fake review. How to tell counterfeit Fossil wrist watch

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OpenShift and Fossil)

OpenShift

Fossil

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0
Git
0 0%
Git
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenShift and Fossil. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare OpenShift and Fossil

OpenShift Reviews

Kubernetes Alternatives 2023: Top 8 Container Orchestration Tools
OpenShift is another container orchestration alternative for Kubernetes. It is a PaaS developed by Red Hat as a hybrid, enterprise-scale platform with extended Kubernetes capabilities for container orchestration. With a Linux OS, OpenShift helps you securely automate and scale the entire lifecycle of containerized applications. That means you can virtualize every host and...
Source: www.servertribe.com
OpenShift alternatives
The OpenShift platform was released by Red Hat – the maker of the professional Linux distribution “Red Hat Enterprise Linux” (RHEL). The OpenShift alternative “Rancher” has now been taken over by the traditional Linux provider SUSE. “Canonical Kubernetes”, is another OpenShift alternative from an established Linux provider. Read on to find out more about these and other...
Source: www.ionos.com

Fossil Reviews

We have no reviews of Fossil yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Fossil seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OpenShift mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of OpenShift yet. Tracking of OpenShift recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Fossil mentions (26)

  • Git Bug: Distributed, Offline-First Bug Tracker Embedded in Git, with Bridges
    Fossil[0] has bug tracking as a standard feature, and through the HTTP role-based authentication, you are able to set up users with different privileges; for instance, being able to read and write the bug tracker without the ability to push new code. [0]: https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki. - Source: Hacker News / 4 days ago
  • I struggled with Git, so I'm making a game to spare others the pain
    Sort of repeating a nested comment, but - I've been using fossil ( https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki ) for years and absolutely love it. Single executable you just download and put in your path. Sane, well-documented interface (CLI, API and web). Full repo in a single SQLite file. Highly intelligent and efficient diff-based storage and compression (including network transfers). Rock-solid code.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • jj: A Git-compatible VCS that is both simple and powerful
    Neither do I. This discussion isn't about what someone else runs or doesn't run on their computers. By all means, run `jj`. Or use `fossil`[1], which I maintain is technically superior to both `git` and `jj` (if you disagree, show me another VCS that also gives me a ticketing system, wiki, documentation system, forum and webui, all from a single executeable that allows me to set everything up with a few command... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Htmx Is Composable?
    Feedback to author: The diagram and explanation took a beat longer than normal to scan, since this buries a bit that it's not about the beautiful source control system called fossil shipped as a composition of modules: https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki Great diagrams, so of course that's the first thing a reader will skim. People biuld things based on git all the time, the diagram looks like... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Cloudflare API Down
    There are (all too rare) tools that back those objects with git as well. And there's always fossil ... https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki But it's not git. :-(. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OpenShift and Fossil, you can also consider the following products

Google App Engine - A powerful platform to build web and mobile apps that scale automatically.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Platform is a comprehensive PaaS solution that paves the way for the developers to test, build, and mitigate the issues in the cloud application before the final deployment.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

Loading...