Mercurial SCM VS Fossil
Compare Mercurial SCM VS Fossil and see what are their differences
Sup! Standup Bot
The complete stand-up and follow-up bot
featured
Sup! Standup Bot
Mercurial SCM
Git
Atlassian Bitbucket Server
GitHub Desktop
Apache Subversion
Perforce
VSTS
Visual Studio Team Services
Fossil
GitLab
Git
Bazaar
Redmine
Pijul
Apache Subversion
CatchJS
Mercurial SCM FossilNo Mercurial SCM videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Fossil seems to be a lot more popular than Mercurial SCM. While we know about 23 links to Fossil, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Mercurial SCM. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Many people have asked me to write a blog post on my preference of Mercurial over Git and so far I've refused and will continue doing so for the foreseeable future. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Mercurial Paris Conference 2023 is a professional and technical conference around mercurial scm, a free, distributed source control management tool. Source: over 1 year ago
Feedback to author: The diagram and explanation took a beat longer than normal to scan, since this buries a bit that it's not about the beautiful source control system called fossil shipped as a composition of modules: https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki Great diagrams, so of course that's the first thing a reader will skim. People biuld things based on git all the time, the diagram looks like... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
There are (all too rare) tools that back those objects with git as well. And there's always fossil ... https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki But it's not git. :-(. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
I don't think git should be the infrastructure of collaboration. It's good for long-lived artifacts, but isn't good for discussion, for rights management, ... Fossil (https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki) is of course better, but if git must remain, I believe the base infrastructure should be the mailing list. Patches, branches and releases can live inside a mailing list, it is naturally built for... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Have you spent much time using Fossil? https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
> To make things more complicated, they also use their a relatively niche version management system instead of git. Which would complicate making contributions (if they accepted them). The Fossil VCS actually has a page explaining why it was created, instead of just using Git: https://sqlite.org/whynotgit.html Honestly, a lot of those points make sense, especially how Git is perhaps a little bit more complex and... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Atlassian Bitbucket Server - Atlassian Bitbucket Server is a scalable collaborative Git solution.
GitHub Desktop - GitHub Desktop is a seamless way to contribute to projects on GitHub and GitHub Enterprise.
Bazaar - Bazaar is a tool for helping people collaborate.
Apache Subversion - Mirror of Apache Subversion. Contribute to apache/subversion development by creating an account on GitHub.